The thing is, if we are talking tactics to achieve a political aim, and we simplify that aim to be getting it agreed in law that women are women because of biology and not pink-and-girly-ness, then the tactic of patiently engaging with TRAs and vetting everyone on our side for wrongthink hasn't been very effective has it?
What has been effective is getting the message out. Via stickers, fundraising, meetings, t shirts, YouTube, or going to America to meet with conservatives.
Previous posters who claim saintly victimhood for lesbians or minorities have failed to gain a mandate for their views and certainly don't represent lesbians, minorities or anyone except themselves.
The implication that I can't engage with a conservative without either tainting myself or filling my little lady-brain with evil wrongthink is extremely patronising.
Personally this issue means a lot to me, so much so that I have decided to become a single issue voter. Single issue politics in the US has been extremely powerful - the widespread restrictions on abortion are due to single issue voters who refuse to back candidates that don't agree with them on that one point. Other right wing points, such as immigration or economic policy, become almost an afterthought to this voting block.
This takes a certain amount of stubbornness to do; one could argue that only the privileged could afford to pursue single issue politics as most people's politics are more driven by their personal situation. Maybe, as previously mentioned privilege isn't a binary thing, and one can be privileged in one respect but disadvantaged in another. It's still going to be my tactic, and I support whatever alliance achieves the aim I want. It doesn't mean anything more than that, and if you want to continue to insist it does, rock on.
I stand 100% with Posie.