Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The Financial Juggernaut that is Stonewall

100 replies

womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 10:06

Extracts from the 2017 Financial Accounts of Stonewall:

2017 Total income £7.2m

Donations 1.7m
Grants 0.9m (total income from govt 0.65.million)
Sponsorship 0.4m
Events 0.8m
Fees 2.2m
Programs 0.5m

2017 Total expenditure £6.1m

fundraising 1m
campaigns/policy/research 2.5m
employment advice 1.6
empowerment programs 1m

2.3m Support costs ( £0.5m gen mgt costs, 4 people paid > £60k)
Key mgt personnel: CEO,MD,exec dir x2 - total employee benefits of those 4: £300k

Trustees: Jonathan Andrews, Richard Beaven, Simon Blake, Katie Cornhill, Catherine Dixon, Jan Gooding (Chair), Sheldon Mills, Phyll Opoku-Gyimah, Rosalyn Parker, Lisa Pinney (Treasurer), Oliver Rowe, Tim Toulon, Mohsin Zaidi

CEO Ruth Hunt
Secretary Maxine Draper

4 core strategic priorities:

•	Empowering individuals
•	Transforming institutions
•	Changing hearts and minds
•	Changing laws

Here’s some information about Jan Gooding, Stonewall Chair, who seems to have overseen the financialisation of Stonewall from charity into deep pocketed lobby group:

Jan Gooding Group Brand Director Aviva

Jan is one of the most senior directors in the Aviva Group and is responsible for the leadership, oversight and governance of brand and marketing strategy worldwide. She is the very visible sponsor of the LGBT employee network Aviva Pride, and was elected Chair of Trustees of Stonewall in May 2014. This year she guided the board of trustees through a change in the remit of Stonewall to include ‘T’ in the focus of their activities, and in March she gave the annual lecture to the Employment Lawyers Association, addressing over 500 lawyers, QC’s and judges across the country on the areas of concern to Stonewall as the legal changes took hold.

From her public Linkedin Profile:

Jan Gooding is a marketing leader with a career which has included senior executive roles working with blue chip companies like BT, British Gas, Diageo, Unilever and, most latterly, as the Group Brand director at Aviva. She was responsible for unifying the c£400K global marketing spend under the brand idea 'Good Thinking'. In her final role at Aviva, as their first Global Inclusion Director, she led the introduction of the ground-breaking policy of equal parental leave.
-She is currently the Chair of LGBT equality charity Stonewall, which reaches and supports LGBT activists in over 70 countries worldwide. When she took over the helm, Stonewall was focussed on equality based on people’s sexual orientation, and did not actively campaign on gender identity issues-. Under her leadership Stonewall extended it remit to campaign for trans equality in 2015.
She was appointed President of MRS (Market Research Society) April 2017. And is a Fellow of the Marketing Society and member of WACL (Women in Advertising and Communication London).
Jan is known to be one of the UK’s most outspoken marketing leaders on the subjects ranging from building global brands to inclusive leadership.

Her remarks from 2018 Stonewall Review:

Now is such a critical time for Stonewall, as we continue to fight for all aspects of LGBT inclusion. Reflecting on the year now coming to an end, 2018 has been a difficult year, particularly for trans people. They have faced a barrage of negative coverage, and we at Stonewall have made no bones about using our voice and our platform to directly confront it. But the struggle for lesbian, gay and bi equality hasn’t let up either.
We stand up forpeople.
We stand up for the respect and acceptance of L, plus G, plus B, plus T, plus, plus, plus: we stand up for people. For just as we jointly suffer from hate, discrimination and ignorance from certain quarters of society, we are united by, and stand together, to insist on equality for everyone.
One thing is true. We do draw a line with regard to questioning whether trans people deserve the same level of equality as any other group. This aspect of the current media frenzy is not up for debate.
We also believe that giving greater equality and respect to trans people will not negatively impact the rights of women or any other group.
We know that acceptance and respect for all LGBT+ people is not achieved through false ‘debates’ on social media.
We know that the acceptance and respect we seek for all LGBT+ people is not achieved through false ‘debates’ on social media. It is done by hard work on the ground, day after day, in our schools, communities and workplaces.
Here are a few examples of what our brilliant staff and volunteers have been up to:
• For the first time we attended 30 Prides,reaching some communities for the first time.
• Our hardworking Information Service dealt with over 5,550 calls and emails.
• We now have over 1,500 Stonewall School Champions and trained 2,300 teachers, all of whom are now working to make schools safe and inclusive spaces for LGBT pupils. Importantly, 458 of these are schools with faith values.
• We launched a new international programme to work with 29 organisations in 25 countries to specifically address human rights violations faced by lesbians, bi women and trans people over the next two years.
• We successfully lobbied the Government to make Relationships and Sex Education, and Health Education, compulsory in all of England’s schools and LGBT inclusive.
• As part of our international ‘Access to Justice’ programme, we trained 118 police, prosecutors and policy-makers in Europe on hate crime and LGBT equality and diversity.
• No less than 25 leading global organisations, employing 1.3 million people across the world, demonstrated their commitment to improving workplace equality by entering our Global Workplace Equality Index.
• We successfully lobbied the Government to reduce the period that gay and bi men need to have had no sexual activity before donating blood from 12 months to 3 months.
• Following our extensive lobbying, the UK Government launched a consultation on reforming the Gender Recognition Act (2004) which received record coverage and a huge response from our supporters.

Rather ironic remarks considering the unreliability of Stonewall’s stats:

-I have to say that throughout my career getting my hands on trustworthy data and insight has been crucial. It helps to explain where you are. How you may have got there. And what viable options there may be to move forward-.

And from our friends at Pink News, some insights into the PR & marketing expertise behind Stonewall:

Ogilvy Pride UK is the LGBT specialist PR & marketing consultancy of Ogilvy & Mather Group UK. As well as being recognised as Stonewall Champions, Ogilvy’s global efforts have been recognised by the Human Rights Campaign Organisation, who have rated the company as one of the best places to work as an LGBT individual.

Ogilvy Pride targets pink pound. The division will help clients tap into the $3trillion global LGBT market.By 2020 it is estimated that in London alone the traditional mainstream majority will be outnumbered by minority groups. For a global brand campaign to be truly strategic in its communications, consideration of minority consumer audiences such as LGBT is now key.’

Ogilvy Pride is also the first global agency to partner with UK-based LGBT advocacy organization, Stonewall. A spokesperson for Stonewall told Gay Star Business: ‘It’s great to see Ogilvy launch a specialism that specifically looks out for the needs of the LGBT community.’
In the US, Ogilvy & Mather Group scored a top ranking of 100 on the Human Rights Campaign’s most recent Corporate Equality Index.
Below, in a recent video produced by Ogilvy Pride, Jonathan Mildenhall, the Chief Marketing Officer of Airbnb, explains why initiatives such as Ogilvy Pride are important in the marketing industry; an industry he describes as ‘inherently conservative’.

Ogilvy Pride, the LGBT and inclusive marketing specialists from across the Ogilvy Group, have announced a significant expansion of the agency’s leadership team with the appointment of a new head of the agency for the team and two new deputies

OP posts:
womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 10:08

A sister post to this one about the network of execs promoting Stonewall

OP posts:
BeUpStanding · 24/01/2019 10:17

I thought charities weren't allowed to lobby government?

DrHeidi · 24/01/2019 10:19

Can somebody please look into the 2.2 million income in 'fees', the largest source of income.

What are these fees for? Who pays them? Employers? Universities? Public bodies?

Badstyley · 24/01/2019 10:40

One thing is true. We do draw a line with regard to questioning whether trans people deserve the same level of equality as any other group. This aspect of the current media frenzy is not up for debate.

So Jan Gooding thinks it’s fine to question lesbians, gay men and bisexual peoples’ right to equality, unlike trans, which is absolutely not up for debate. Well yes Jan, I think we’d kinda noticed that, but nice to have it in writing I suppose.

I shall keep this for the next time I’m accused of debating transpeoples’ right to exist, cos ya know, I’m a lesbian, so it would seem, according to Stonewall, that it’s actually my life that’s on the table for debate.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 10:47

What are these fees for? Who pays them? Employers? Universities? Public bodies?

All of the above - it's obvious that Jan was touting for business for Stonewall when she was addressing the lawyers.

Here's a link to a recent post about who the top 100 employers are according to Stonewall.

So we can see the insidious merry go round of back-slapping, corporate networking, Stonewall nominating "top employers", execs nominating each other for awards like the FT LGBT+ Hall of Fame and Stonewall's increasing fee base.

OP posts:
DrHeidi · 24/01/2019 11:02

Would it be possible to get a list of all Stonewall fee payers, along with amounts? FOI? Wonder if all university students (or taxpayers) are happy to have their university fees (taxes) spent on what is essentially a lobby group.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 11:12

And all the execs involved control very large budgets - accident or what?

OP posts:
womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 11:23

Welcome of the future - a few profiles of TW I picked from the 2018 FT Outstanding Role Model LGBT list - the number refers to their postion in the list (where their photo and profile can be found:

Angelica Ross 8
President Miss Ross Inc

As a content creator through Miss Ross, Inc., Angelica produces short films, as well as short form conversational media content to help push organizations and U.S. Policies on trans issues forward. She tours nationally, speaking her powerful mission into action with business leaders, educators, and politicians. Angelica also founded TransTech Social Enterprises, a social enterprise sponsored by Allied Media Projects

Pips Bunce 34
Director Credit Suisse

Pips is co-lead of the Credit Suisse LGBT and Ally Program which drives ally membership and engagement, and is an active member of the LGBT and Ally Network steering committee. She is also a reverse mentor to the firm’s to the firm’s group CFO and UK CEO, informing him on the importance of LGBT inclusion and helping drive change. She authored the ‘Trans Your Questions Answered’ educational guide and Trans videos circulated to thousands of allies internally. She also drives many initiatives including helping deliver a fully Trans inclusive healthcare plan, LGBT inclusive policy updates, gender-neutral restrooms, LGBT self-selection identification, introduction of the Mx pronoun, and educational content. Externally, Pips works with many charities and organisations to raise awareness of LGBT and non-binary inclusion, and is an ambassador for Transformation, the GIRES Society, P3 (Proud Professional Parents), DRM, and Mermaids. She is a regular speaker, panellist and presenter on LGBTQI inclusion, and the role corporates can play in advancing societal support for the LGBTQI communities. She has also received much external recognition for her work including amongst others winning the British LGBT Awards category for LGBT Inspirational Leader and, appeared in many publications in positive support of this work.

Amanda McKay 35
Quality Director Major Projects Balfour Beatty

As an out Trans Woman, and the most senior LGBT employee within Balfour Beatty, Amanda actively works to demonstrate that Balfour Beatty is a diverse, inclusive and accepting employer. She is a Co-Chair+ of both the Women’s network, and the LGBT and Allies network

Antonia Belcher 43
Managing Partner MHBC

Antonia is a regular a panellist and speaker on Trans workplace inclusion and role modelling, most recently with the Chartered Insurance Institute, the WSP VIBE Equality Network, and various Pride in the City events. She has contributed to two books; “Transitioning in the Workplace – A Guidebook” & “The CEO Guide to Diversity and Inclusion”. This year she also launched the ‘Antonia & Andrea Belcher Trans Fund’ to support trans causes worldwide. It is administered by the newly established charity vehicle set up by Elliot Vaughn, called GiveOut, and it will now make small grants to help those activists and organisations working across the world to improve the lives of trans people. She is also a Trustee of Diversity Role Models, and attends South Bank University EDI Steering Group meetings to assist on Trans issues for their policy work. She produced a blog for Pride in the City, and recently attended the AKT Dinner with Sir Ian McKellen. She has been nominated for a number of accolades, including the NatWest British LGBT Awards 2018, the Gary Frisch Gay Times Honour 2017, and was included in the City AM Power 100 Women listing in 2016.

I was born in 1957 as Anthony. From an early age I knew there was something different about me – I didn’t feel like a girl, but there were questions in my head about being a boy. Occasionally my mind would wander. I’d invent an imaginary place in my head where I could go, where I was transformed into a girl. I now know that I had been struggling to cope with Gender Dysphoria, but I didn’t discover that until much later on in life.

Cynthia Fortlage
CIO GHY

The sole executive in GHY International who identifies as non-cis gender, non-hetro normative, Cynthia leads by example every day. She started a business helping to develop people to their full potential in business, with a focus on women and LBGT+ individuals. She is the President of the Board for local LBGT+ centre, and a social media blogger on LBGT+ issues. A transgender leader within community, Cynthia is also a playwright and actor working to accurately portray the stories of women and transgender people. She has been regularly recognised for her inclusion work, having recently been ranked among Huffington Post’s Top 100 Most Social CIOs on Twitter, and as one of CXO Talk’s 20 Most Influential CIOs.

Inga Beal, CEO of Lloyds is always on these lists (a woman) as well as Martine Rothblatt (TW)

OP posts:
womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 11:24

Would it be possible to get a list of all Stonewall fee payers, along with amounts? FOI? Wonder if all university students (or taxpayers) are happy to have their university fees (taxes) spent on what is essentially a lobby group

Good idea - who knows the FOI process?

OP posts:
GerryblewuptheER · 24/01/2019 11:27

Shit.

Wish I'd known this before I sent a shitty email to Aviva 're their useof the word gender in their marketing and insurance forms.

DrHeidi · 24/01/2019 11:35

Who knows the FOI process? Any journalist worth their salt.

I am so surprised nobody has been asking these questions. Private Eye has been extremely tame.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 11:55

I'd like to see an FOI on how the 2.5m was spent in the category campaigns/policy/research.

I think Stonewall may have breached the Guidelines issued by the Charity Commission:

This is from the Charity Commission's GUIDANCE for Campaigning and political activity guidance for charities (CC9)

• Legal requirement: as with any decision they make, when considering campaigning and political activity charity trustees must carefully weigh up the possible bene ts against the costs and risks in deciding whether the campaign is likely to be an effective way of furthering or supporting the charity’s purposes.

• Legal requirement: when campaigning, charity trustees must comply not only with charity law, but other civil and criminal laws that may apply. Where applicable they should also comply with the Code of the Advertising Standards Authority.

• A charity can campaign using emotive or controversial material, where this is lawful and justifiable in the context of the campaign. Such material must be factually accurate and have a legitimate evidence base.

• The principles of charity campaigning and political activity are the same, whether the activity is carried out in the United Kingdom or overseas.

OP posts:
womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 11:57

2016 Charities in receipt of Government grants will be banned from using these taxpayer funds to engage in political lobbying, The Telegraph can disclose.

A new clause to be inserted into all new and renewed grant agreements will make sure that taxpayer funds are spent on improving people's lives and good causes, rather than covering lobbying for new regulation or using taxpayers’ money to lobby for more government funding.

Unsure whether this came into being - not my area of expertise.

OP posts:
Lysistrataknowsherstuff · 24/01/2019 12:20

The FOIA only applies to public bodies.

womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 12:31

The Freedom Of Information Act 2000 – For Charities Too?

25 MAY 2018 - This year has again seen several high-profile news stories which have risked knocking public confidence in charities. Some MPs remain sceptical about the levels of transparency in charities and their operations. This was shown by a revealing survey in 2017, carried out by research consultancy nfpSynergy, which revealed the majority of MPs still expect the charity sector to improve its standard of transparency.

Yet despite this current climate the government has now reiterated that the FOIA request procedure will not be extended to include all charities. In March Baroness Stedman-Scott, responding to a written question on the status of the government's 'constant review' of the issue, said 'the Government is not persuaded of the need to amend the legislation to include all charities and there are no plans to undertake further consultations at this time.'

Therefore, whilst charities might well expect increased regulation in light of recent stories, such as a statutory serious incident reporting requirement as recently suggested by the Charity Commission, they can take some comfort in knowing that they will not also be expected to meet the demands of FOIA in the immediate future.

OP posts:
Danaquestionseverything · 24/01/2019 13:33

Well the clue is right there in their statement really.
4 core strategic priorities

  • Transforming Institutions
Interesting choice of word there... why not educating? Informing? Hell grab a thesaurus I'm sure there are numerous words that could be used.

Transforming means changing. Why choose that particular word, especially in relation to institutions yet use changing for to others?
Could it be that institutions have more power and influence than a citizen? Something to ponder I guess 🤔

R0wantrees · 24/01/2019 13:41

4 core strategic priorities:

•Empowering individuals
•Transforming institutions
•Changing hearts and minds
•Changing laws

Stonewall have explicitly campaigned to remove single sex protections for females from The Equality Act 2010

July 2018 James Kirkup:

Some facts about the events that preceded the Government statement here that the coming consultation on the Gender Recognition Act will be narrowly drawn and not affect the Equality Act’s single sex exemptions.

I offer these facts because some are claiming “there was never any question of removing/amending EA exceptions.” Those claims are either mistaken or dishonest.
August 2015
Stonewall submission to the Women & Equalities Select Committee says MPs should amend the EA to
“remove exemptions, such as access to single-sex spaces”

Jan 2016
Women & Equalities Committee says EA should be amended so that

“occupational requirements provision and / or the single-sex / separate services provision shall not apply”.

July 2016
Govt response to W&E Committee says: “we agree with the principle of this recommendation” on EA exemptions and seeks evidence for “future policy discussions”

July 2017
Govt promises GRA reform “ as part of a broad consultation of the legal system that underpins gender transition.”

July 2017
Stonewall commits to “advocate for the removal” of EA provisions allowing sex-based discrimination.

June 2018
Govt says:

“We are clear that we have no intention of amending the Equality Act 2010, the legislation that allows for single sex spaces.”

In sum: MPs and others told govt to amend/remove Equality Act single-sex exemptions. Govt considered doing so. Then govt ruled it out. / ends

(link includes embedded sources:
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1004635839480164352.html?refreshed=yes

Danaquestionseverything · 24/01/2019 13:53

Again thanks Ro, honestly you're a force of nature. I did notice the word Law. Why do you think they left that in? Maybe they hope that most people would take it as face value and assume it's intended to ensure that trans people have (as they should) the same legal protections as the rest of the community. Who would even think there could be an ulterior motive 🤷🏼‍♀️

R0wantrees · 24/01/2019 14:12

Again thanks Ro, honestly you're a force of nature. I did notice the word Law. Why do you think they left that in?

They are a charity and so they have to have defined scope for their activities.

They have been actively lobbying to change laws.

ChattyLion · 24/01/2019 14:16

Just bumping this excellent informative thread

R0wantrees · 24/01/2019 14:18

Stonewall formed to change and end the Section 28 law. It then campaigned to change the laws to enable same sex marriage.

These were important laws to change.

They have now continued but with a very specific agenda which impacts women and children. Increasing numbers of its previous supporters are asking questions. Stonewall seems determined to ignore them
see petition:

www.ipetitions.com/petition/dear-stonewall-please-reconsider-your-approach

Ruth Hunt's (CEO) response:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3384455-Ruth-Hunt-Stonewall-do-not-and-will-not-acknowledge-that-there-is-a-conflict-between-trans-rights-and-sex-based-women-s-rights

it's difficult to get juggernauts to stop!

womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 14:27

It reads to me like there’s a lot of money riding on the achievement of those objectives - maybe the promise of lots more income (personal & enterprise) in terms of fees and grants from Rothblatt et al.

Is there another “charity” with the same profile as Stonewall elsewhere in the world?

There’s money on the table somewhere and basically they have turned Stonewall into a global business enterprise. Those trustees must have a lot of time on their hands to be so involved in Stonewall- almost as though there will be nice little earners opening up with “naive woke” profiles. And no consideration of the harm they are doing to women, kids and institutions / their action is unconscionable because there is no long term clinical research and facts to back up their assertions and actions as demanded by the Charity Commission.

Where’s the safeguarding - oh it’s not woke /s they are putting women and children in harms way with never a thought

This all constitutes a gross failure of duty of care where the vested interests of individuals, ideology & organisation take precedence over the wellbeing and welfare of women and children.

OP posts:
womanformallyknownaswoman · 24/01/2019 14:29

Naice not naive!

OP posts: