Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?

469 replies

MsJeminaPuddleduck · 09/11/2018 08:22

Lady Justice 👩‍⚖️ (@RadFemLawyer)
09/11/2018, 08:16
Have just seen this. Argument is Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues. pic.twitter.com/WVkBMxZeqv

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
RedToothBrush · 13/11/2018 09:07

So we need to ban burgers cos they cause the harassment of Mexicans?

Seems logical to me. When's the crowd funder being launched.

WitchfinderGeneralHarrumph · 13/11/2018 09:12

I hope this DOES get picked up by the Mail; Haddock & Hayden would do well to peruse THOSE comments...

RedToothBrush · 13/11/2018 09:12

Can wait until the Times, Spectator and the Mail print a story explaining Stephanie case. Surely Stephanie will have to sue them all too.

Isn't that right Babs?

Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?
HandsOffMyRights · 13/11/2018 09:16

How is Steph going to sort more than half the human race?

I wait with baited breath, Steph. In the meantime I have work, kids and ageing parents to contend with.

What responsibilities do they have? Because it seems like they have all the time in the world to navel gaze.

Notmynom · 13/11/2018 09:18

@redtoothbrush yes I was wondering if the papers would pick this up as a follow on to the Linehan coverage. Presumably that is Hayden's worry too which is why they are so busily running around trying to get the police to scare the poster who shared it into removing it.

AngryAttackKittens · 13/11/2018 09:20

If Steph is going to sue everyone who doesn't think women have penises then Steph is going to be awfully busy.

RedToothBrush · 13/11/2018 09:21

This is headed for an I'm Spartacus type moment in full on Barbara Streisand glory.

ForniteIsTheNewCrack · 13/11/2018 09:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ForniteIsTheNewCrack · 13/11/2018 09:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BirdsEyeFrozen · 13/11/2018 09:31

Thanks Hamster. I avoid the calorie counters too. Triggery as hell. It makes me want to reach for the chocolate hob nobs.

What a link eh? I imagine Police Constable Mumsnetter acting all professional as she, or he, takes down Steph's particulars. Followed by "you will never guess...." in the back office.

I do hope that the Thin Blue Line realises the a.k.a. and the previous convictions. Then " nob it off", as it is colloquially known, in one of the Police Authorities haunted by our vexatious litigant..

So sad, to have read that the person Steph Hayden (aka Anthony G Halliday) assaulted with the golf club, later died.
Although, apparently, it was not directly linked to the head injury, so no further action.

Traumatic injury can affect a person's health in so many ways later on. Ask any Doctor.

Ereshkigal · 13/11/2018 09:33

Maybe Steph is going to Putter us in our place?

😁

WitchfinderGeneralHarrumph · 13/11/2018 09:48

Expect a grandiose URGENT PRESS RELEASE from the office* of Hayden, Hayden, Halliday, Halliday & Hayden soon.

  • counsel will meet you in the drive-thru...
Needmoresleep · 13/11/2018 09:48

And there was no need. A parking thread on MN complete with diagram and they would have solved the problem before it escalated.

BirdsEyeFrozen · 13/11/2018 09:52

Grin I love Mumsnet.
(and Birdseye Foods)

pancaketosser · 13/11/2018 10:05

Ask any Doctor.

Not sure I'd say any doctor...

BirdsEyeFrozen · 13/11/2018 10:08

pancaketosser
Grin

Hamster00 · 13/11/2018 10:14

If he's not presiding over the case - I'm out Grin

Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?
hellandhairnets · 13/11/2018 10:17

LOL.

What an idiot.

RedToothBrush · 13/11/2018 10:21

Wait a second. We are supposed to be taking Stephanie seriously aren't we?

Hahhhahah hahahaha ha!

AngryAttackKittens · 13/11/2018 10:22

I think the term "lolsuit" was made for situations like this.

Popchyk · 13/11/2018 10:22

Don't worry people.

I've heard that Justine has engaged the services of Giuliana to represent Mumsnet in court.

SandyDrawsBadly · 13/11/2018 10:23

Sound of music anyone?

Mumsnet is breaching section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 (harassment) by hosting feminist forums that discuss gender-critical issues - legal case?
littlbrowndog · 13/11/2018 10:27

Aw sandy. You are the best love your work

Hamster00 · 13/11/2018 10:28

SandyDrawsBadly has just won the internet for the day. I can't even...

...that's just beyond funny. Grin

Popchyk · 13/11/2018 10:29

That is great, Sandy.

You are really talented.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread