Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"

999 replies

R0wantrees · 02/11/2018 15:49

(twitter account in screenshot apparently suspended from twitter following mass targetted reporting yesterday)

previous threads:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3354331-Dr-Adrian-Harrop-thread-the-third-yes-weve-edited-the-title

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3248676-dr-adrian-harrop-dr-misogyny-is-pursuing-another-woman

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3244781-dr-adrian-harrop-who-the-funk-does-he-think-he-is

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3399503-Adrian-Harrop-feeds-back-on-his-own-debate-on-Feedback

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3392510-Adrian-Harrop-also-chimes-in-on-Karen-White

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3408520-Cant-stop-laughing-at-Haddock

Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"
OP posts:
Thread gallery
139
TigerDrankAllTheWaterInTheTap · 13/11/2018 08:01

Just to look at the underlying principles here, if someone has a criminal record for serious offences I don't think it's in the public interest for that to be expunged from the record, and I especially don't think the law and Google should allow this by default if the person concerned has changed name. This is the same in principle as people being entitled to know if a new sexual partner has a history of violence/stalking/sexual offences and to know if a potential business partner has a good credit record, no history of fraud, and so on. I know there are provisions in law for minor offences to be extinguished from the record after a number of years but I wouldn't regard A hitting B on the head with a golf club (just to take one hypothetical example) as a minor offence.

SunsetBeetch · 13/11/2018 09:33

Steph spends a lot of time talking to the police

Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"
Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"
EchoCardioGran · 13/11/2018 16:04

I wonder if Steph used the Park and Ride facility?

ALittleHelp18 · 13/11/2018 17:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 13/11/2018 17:21

Oh, shame.

I've been enjoying this thread. I'll be sad to see it go.

OnTheDarkSideOfTheSpoon · 13/11/2018 17:25

Birth sex Wink

But bloody hell alittlehelp18 I can't see how it can be an infringement to state publicly available material.

Bittermints · 13/11/2018 17:27

Did you mean 19/07/73, OP?

WTFIsAGleepglorp · 13/11/2018 17:31

BirdseyesFrozen

ALittleHelp18
Thank you so much

Seconded.

ALittleHelp18 · 13/11/2018 17:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Bittermints · 13/11/2018 17:53

No problem, just thought if there's any question of this ending up in court best to have typos corrected pronto. Thanks for digging this out. I totally agree with your post above.

Flooffloof · 13/11/2018 18:15

So if we all copy that post,will we all have to go to "court" or be named on a money claim online form? I'm willing.

cockBlocker · 13/11/2018 18:16

Wow, I had a post removed and got a strike for criticising Dr H's writing style. I didn't know literary criticism was not permitted now, it pales in comparison to the abusive, violent threats women get on Twitter. Sheer desperation.

cockBlocker · 13/11/2018 18:21

Sorry, wrong thread!

BirdseyeFrozen · 13/11/2018 18:22

ALittleHelp
Ime "Steph"is not a person who has come on the Feminist boards of MN to debate or disagree for a genuine reason.

This is someone with violent criminal convictions, who stalks women expressing feminist views on the internet, and threatens them in various ways. Their misogyny is evident.

This is a person who has multiple names, personas, and failed organisations in their wake.

This is a person who only recently, we find, has cloaked themselves in a protected characteristic. That is a disgraceful sham, and an insult particularly to the respected members of this forum who happen to be trans.

I've never seen a cogent argument from a.k.a on here, just nasty threats directed at individuals, some of whom have complaints in to the GMC. The behaviour of this individual has been to unsuccessfully intimidate and frighten women, whom I have never met, into withdrawing a genuine complaint about a GP before the General Medical Council. Why, one can only speculate, but I am guessing there is a financial reason somewhere. Some of us may not remain on the boards, that is up to MNHQ. It does not mean that we disappear from organising against those who exploit others for their own ends.

Whatever MN as an organisation decides to do next, rest assured that "Steph" is running out of road.

"Steph" will never be able to have a genuine legal practice as the rest of us understand one to be. "Steph" will always have to reveal their past in a DRB check.
"Steph" put "Steph" into the social commentary arena, no one else. The fact that their personas and failed businesses and convictions trail behind them is no ones fault but their own.

Thank you for speaking up ALittleHelp. Courage called, and you stepped up to the mark.

SunsetBeetch · 13/11/2018 21:11

Bravo alittlehelp and BirdsEyeFrozen . It's time someone stood up to these bullies and called their bluff. Thank you, thank you!

Melamin · 13/11/2018 22:08

Blimey - I was thinking our steph was just a bit of a wideboy with all those company startups and downs, and the frequent location changes but the criminal convictions are not what I was expecting Shock Hmm
Thank you from me too.

Mrskeats · 13/11/2018 22:18

What were the crimes? Can’t find them

BirdseyeFrozen · 13/11/2018 22:22

Blush alittlehelp brought the jigsaw puzzle together.

Mrskeats · 13/11/2018 22:40

Can someone pls pm me? Need to know now

WTFIsAGleepglorp · 13/11/2018 23:41

This is what ALittleHelp put on the table.

Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"
Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"
Dr Adrian Harrop thread the fourth. "GMC do care & have taken it to the next level"
BreakWindandFire · 14/11/2018 00:14

Steph has also put documents online. She put a letter to the Birkbeck President up on Facebook in 2016, and it's still there so we can assume she's happy to share it.

Here

Title:
Resignations of Steven Hayden / Glen Gallogly / Luke Nash-Jones
Disciplinary Proceedings against Steven Hayden

If you read it in full, it's about allegations of harassment the Birkbeck President made against Steph and others.

Steph (Steven as she was in 2016) dismisses these as "vexatious allegations of misconduct against me".

"Further, you casually dismiss allegations of violence and intimidation against me and others, yet then suspend me on similar allegations.."

"..you have suspended me for effectively losing my temper with you"
Translation: LOOK WHAT YOU MADE ME DO Hmm

"In addition I will be writing to you in a personal capacity to formally resign from the Union as an ordinary member and commence the procedures necessary for bringing legal action against the Union for inter alia Defamation, harassment, victimisation, and direct discrimination"

Ahh, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose Steph. Grin

BitOfFun · 14/11/2018 00:41

Well, this thread has been quite the eye-opener...

BirdseyeFrozen · 14/11/2018 07:48

Thanks BreakWindandFire, quite the eye opener BitofFun.
Why do I have a feeling that we have only just started to peel back the layers?
I think most people here get the general idea by now....

DrOctagon · 14/11/2018 08:45

As I mentioned on the other thread, Steph was still presenting as male in February 2016, but obtained their GRC this year. Happened quick didn't it?

They said this would never happen, looks like it is

Mrskeats · 14/11/2018 09:14

Omg. Genuinely shocked. How can they possibly have any credibility at all? Or practise as a ‘lawyer’?