Indignation that Posie shared link to Leeds poster removal

[Juells]

It's quite hilarious. As if PP doesn't have a right to link to an article about the billboard she paid for being removed as a hate crime.

www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/new-leeds-billboard-sparks-transphobia-15302971

The poll that's mentioned in the screenshot is at that link.

Some of the comments on the article are very enlightening - the sense of entitlement is breathtaking.

Its a campaign based on hate and ignorance of a minority started by a group of sad little women, that think they have a voice.

How very very stupid of women to think they have a voice. Particularly sad little women, the absolutely worst kind.

Poll results as of a minute ago..

83% don't think the poster should be removed :)

Some of the comments are bonkers conkers.

Helen is my very favouritist. Her frothing entertains me most mornings.

That won't fly in the county that rejoices in calling a spade a bastarding shovel.

Also 'people who think they have a voice???'

Give them back the spade and let them keep on digging.

It's quite hilarious. As if PP doesn't have a right to link to an article about the billboard she paid for being removed as a hate crime.

Hahahahahaha. I snorted with laughter when Posie posted 'Now would I share this article?' on her FB page.

Then she answered Helen

Don't know why that didn't post...

er...

Yes Juells, that comment is going to help a few people to peak. 😁

This is one of the comments on the article

"Its not the definition that's in question its the hatred of Trans women that is behind the poster and the others that have been removed.
Its a bitter and vicious campaign by a small minority of bigots and transphobes that will not accept that Trans Women are women .
Its a campaign based on hate and ignorance of a minority started by a group of sad little women, that think they have a voice."

That pretty much sums up the TRA position

Again with the accusation that women are 'organising assaults on MN'.

Completely detached from reality, refusing to acknowledge actual science and fact, believing that there is a large majority who agree with them, and believing that there are threads here where women organize attacks against people.

It's good that they're being honest for a change and letting us see their appalling misogyny. Women don't deserve voices apparently. Which is what the problem here has been all along. And then calling women transphobic for daring to resist it.

And once again, TRA condemnation simply brings an issue to a wider audience. I probably wouldn't have noticed this article if Green hadn't tweeted it. I've now voted!

I voted.

What they need to do is sue Google: it's their definition after all. Yes let's see them try that.

It must be quite a relief for them to be honest about their contempt for women after all this time trying to dissemble.

hate and ignorance of a minority started by a group of sad little women, that think they have a voice

Goodness, it seems like so many of us are under the delusion that we have a voice. This is so dangerous!

waves to all new lurkers, that have been disappointed to find no threats on Mumsnet

(Says Helen, as she frantically shared the very same link with anyone she thinks might possibly vote the way she wants)

Honestly, could they be any more blatantly hypocritical?

My goodness. So many people recognising biology. 😁

They’re doing our work for us. Carry on

drinking coffee and reading your post did not mix well...

Interesting that the poll has a qualifier (absolutely) for the answer “yes” but nothing for “no”.

“No, you utter bellends” would have worked for me.

Of course Posie is criticised for sharing a story about the removal.

The implied social contract expected of those who are abused is that they do not mention that they are abused in case it causes reputational damage to the abuser.