Yep smotheroffive noone is denying that men/women can wear any sort of clothes, or act in feminine/masculine ways.
That's up to them and they should be able to wear what they like in peace.
But most people would be horrified if they realised the government is proposing to amend an act so that people can "self id" as the opposite sex and that will allow them access to services and facilities designed for that sex (like refuges).
So, Fred Blogs will just need to say he's a women (because he feels like one) and he can go where he likes. He doesn't need to shave, wear a dress or change his body in any way. But everybody has to just pretend, or they are "transphobic".
The trouble is "trans" is a very broad term now.
It encompasses (usually gay) men who tend to take hormones and maybe have genital surgery. (Used to be called transsexuals ).
The thing is it now also encompasses crossdressers, men who just like getting dressed up in women's clothes on a Tuesday, and basically anyone who "doesn't feel 100% comfortable in the role of their own gender".
It doesn't just mean vulnerable people on a painful journey. It also means Karen White.
Many organisations, like prisons, are already implementing this policy, to preempt this amendment that the government were trying to get through under the radar.
That's what would called Terfs are objecting to. We want to keep the law as it stands. Many transsexuals also want to keep the medical supervision and gatekeeping that self id would remove.
These are the facts. The ploppers shrieking about phobias and bigots can't deny any of this.
They just tell us we are being very silly to worry that any man having access to any female spaces could possibly be a problem...what do you think?
Today is the last day to fill in the government consultation ( go to Fair Play for Women) to say NO to this amendment.
It's got bugger all to do with gay rights (or race
). It's just to do with women and girls keeping our safeguarding, that's all.