Women on the left are responsible for austerity

[CarrotyO]

I've heard it said that women on the left actually support and are therefore in some way responsible for austerity. This is because both Labour and the Tories support austerity. Therefore any woman who supports Labour, or the Left in general, also knowingly and consciously supports austerity and are therefore also responsible for the 1000s of deaths of disabled people caused by austerity. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

It is a simple fact that there is unbroken consensus on welfare reform that is rooted in economics and academic disciplines and media and politics orgs who do not acknowledge any link between women and welfare, and that is STILL the case at LSE.

WPUK will now seek to prevent discussion of this which is explicitly about PREVENTING discussion of eight years of austerity which quite frankly women cant bear any more and has generated system failure.

They tried to throw Posie under a bus to assert authority and that has failed and now I am saying QED. Watch how WPUK is turned specifically into an organisation with ONE sole aim= to prevent women discussing austerity. I am going to do a video directly addressed to Rth which she will ignore because her identity as labour left will make her. But this WILL be demonstrated and be abundantly clear. Ruth and her peers will make WPUK a machine for preventig women discussing austerity and equality and would have used putting women at risk to do so but cant because we stood up to it and bypassed it.

And because the Corbynism that will soon become MdDonnellism is entirely about a false identity so womens political machinery and trade unions can be occupied by the Labour left, they have become so abusive they are a direct risk of fascism and a direct risk to women and jews and they will try to turn WPUK into that. And its up to the women of WPUK to decide if they stand up to it but I dont need that machinery cos we have our own and that is why we made sure that there was tandem meetings going on where women COULD speak openly and freely about equality being rolled back wuthout being abused in the way the left do.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3369415-Who-shall-we-pick-for-breeding-stock-come-The-Revolution?watched=1

As far as I am aware WPUK are upholding women and TIMs with GRC but no self ID
FPFW seems more 'we accept all TIMS are men, but in order to not initially get the public's back up, lets refer to some of them as 'she' unless specifically making a point about men in wigs in prison when out and about campaigning.
WNNT and the newer groups which have spung up most recently are 'fuck the lies, they are men and we are not messing with pronouns - being polite is whats got us into this shit'

Should that be WNTT? Or if not who are WNNT?

Fair Play for Women's facebook page are now deleting politely asked questions about anti-semitism and political consensus on austerity and blocking posters who ask them but NOT blocking people posting anti-semitic content. They will not respond on twitter and will not acknowledge this either. So I am posting this here.

(I am crap at abbreviations and much else- We need to talk are WNNT WTTTN and whatever abbreviation I manage to put down).

OK thanks, I have heard of we need to talk

Anyone who wants to know what WPUK stand for can read their website womansplaceuk.org

For the specifics in response to GRA reform, read the guidance to help people fill in the consultation womansplaceuk.org/wpuk-guidance-on-gra-consultation/

As for what might be discussed with politicians who are willing to meet with WPUK, I expect it is along the lines of a) the reasons for their five demands, b) the sort of blogs and issues they raise and c) what they outline in their guidance on the GRA consultation.

yup sorry WNTT

all have their place in the education of the public, I see them as a kind of 3 step programme, graduating from one to next

what they did to Posie was just what the left do and they are gearing up to turning WPUK into a machine to prevent discussion of consensus that harms the left which is prevention of discussion of austerity. You have to say no early and let covert behaviour reveal itself

So everyone on this thread agrees with this statement yes?

Caroty you didnt answer my question about the squirrel so I threw it away and we ended up having prawns frm the freezer, noodles and a sandwich. I'll tell you when I go foraging again.

WPUK will now seek to prevent discussion of this which is explicitly about PREVENTING discussion of eight years of austerity which quite frankly women cant bear any more and has generated system failure

Everyone agrees with this, yes?

"Why can't I make them fight??!", she cries in despair.

My dog kills squirrels. Doesn’t eat them though. I used to think she was being a bit of a shit but maybe she just hasn’t found the right recipe yet?

I’m not convinced that centring bisons in our intersectional analysis is the way forward. Maybe we should stick with women, see how that pans out?

Lisa, will you be coming to Manchester next week or do I have to come to Leeds to buy you a drink?
Squirrel nibbles optional.

Bad dog! My cat tries to kill moths but she isn't very good at it.

As far as I am aware WPUK are upholding women and TIMs with GRC but no self ID
FPFW seems more 'we accept all TIMS are men, but in order to not initially get the public's back up, lets refer to some of them as 'she' unless specifically making a point about men in wigs in prison when out and about campaigning.
WNNT and the newer groups which have spung up most recently are 'fuck the lies, they are men and we are not messing with pronouns - being polite is whats got us into this shit

WP 5 campaign demands are:

1. Respectful and evidence-based discussion about the impact of the proposed changes to the Gender Recognition Act to be allowed to take place and for women’s voices to be heard. 2. The principle of women-only spaces to be upheld – and where necessary extended.
2. A review of how the exemptions in the Equality Act (which allow for single sex services, or requirements that only a woman can apply for a job such as in a domestic violence refuge) are being applied in practice.
3. Government to consult with women’s organisations on how self-declaration would impact on women-only services and spaces.
4. Government to consult on how self-declaration will impact upon data gathering – such as crime, employment, pay and health statistics – and monitoring of sex-based discrimination such as the gender pay gap.

Lisa, nobody actually agrees with those wild statements you are making.

So everyone on this thread agrees with this statement yes?

Yes, I do. But what do I know. I am just one of them darn breeders, who are not particularly popular in certain circles.

Btw: I have decided to diversify my food supply. First I thought, focus on roaches, but now that Lisa has fawned over those Cambodian spiders... I mean, chances are really good that roaches will inherit the Earth and all, but we shouldn't discount spiders either...

Have you seen Snowpiercer? Apparently roaches can hypothetically be made into a sort of deeply unpleasant energy bar.

deepwaterSolo you agree that WPUK into a machine to prevent discussion of consensus that harms the left which is prevention of discussion of austerity?

Sorry bad edit...

deepwaiterSolo you agree that they are gearing up to turning WPUK into a machine to prevent discussion of consensus that harms the left which is prevention of discussion of austerity?

you agree that is the hidden aim / agenda of wpuk?

Squirrel nibbles optional.

Are these nuts?
Or something akin to squirrel scratchings?

come on women, if you think this is true, then don't derail by talking about squirrels and nuts, be forthright! This is a serious accusation, lets hear it!