Why is there the assumption that it is in the best interest of the child to be with a mother that doesn't want it?
A child which would not exist if it was not being bought. A child that has been 'made to order'.
The idea that the child would exist and stay with its mother if someone wasn't buying it, somewhat misses the point.
And to be honest, it just seems that comments like that are just a desparate clutching at straws to excuse surrogacy which is falling apart in its inconsistencies.