Hi Macareaux.
I would also add, also if a journalist could FOI to local Authorities then they could build up a national picture of how many schools have been lobbied by trans rights activists.
TRA lobbying children at their schools with a political agenda is wrong. The TRA agenda has an antithetical relationship to biological facts. It worryingly (against NHS advice) advocates for an ‘affirming’ approach to young people and children who express gender confusion/identity questions. This may be uniquely relevant issue to their audience in a primary or secondary school. (There isn’t a gender critical, medical or scientific speaker invited at these sessions btw. It’s not presented as a political or ethical debate). They also send schools ‘information packs’ ie to be used as teaching materials as well as offering speakers.
TRA lobbying states that those who question their orthodoxy are motivated by ‘hate’ or ‘transphobia’- ignoring that there is an enormous clash of rights presented by their beliefs.
This includes around safeguarding children and young people, who incontrovertibly will be put at risk in certain settings if legal gender self ID is brought in. TRAs ignore also that many transsexual people also object to this agenda and fear a loss of the support and services they need if legal gender self ID is brought in.
However, we know that most young people who express confusion or questioning will mature further, change their minds and will later be content with their adult bodies.
A small minority will be diagnosed with body/gender dysmorphia which persists into adulthood and which will need appropriate professional emotional support and treatment.
We don’t know the harm yet of giving children the offlabel drugs used as ‘puberty blockers’, or of long term exposure to opposite- sex hormones or of having surgeries or whether these steps will make people who have gender identity issues feel emotionally better.
Also how do the advocates of rushing into drugs and surgery for children and young people, square this with the fact that the big majority of older men who later in life identify as ‘women’ keep their dicks, and very happily so?
And why the argument to rush to blockers, surgery and hormones for kids, given that other trans people don’t make any interventions or efforts to change their previous outward appearance, and are quite happy with that (Danielle Muscato etc)?
Why is it that kids that should be encouraged to hurry into making permanent changes to their bodies, never going through puberty, not acquiring normal adult physical and mental maturity and (if acquired via puberty) potentially then surgically removing normal mature adult sex characteristics and organs, obliterating their future fertility via surgery? There isn’t an equivalent TRA advocacy for adults to make permanent interventions like that.
What kind of political lobby would want to advocate strongly for there to be children and young people taking drugs and hormones and having surgeries, with the end result that these individuals are in time, of adult stature and adult age, but retaining their prepubescent features and without the normal physical and emotional maturation that happens at puberty. ?
What kind of agenda would be pushing for that? 
Schools don’t normally allow anti-science, anti-evidence politicians in to try to persuade children of their ‘alternative facts’. They don’t normally let them seek to police children's language and thinking, using the manipulative threat that non-compliance is ‘hateful’. They wouldn’t even invite a speaker like that to a sixth form debate.
Why then is this lobby any different?