Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Transwoman complains that The Handmaid's Tale should include them...

186 replies

Destinysdaughter · 10/05/2018 15:06

"For most ­women, Hulu’s The Handmaid’s Tale is terrifying and heart-wrenching. The show’s portrayal of a world that is dehumanizing, spiteful, and disgustingly violent toward womanhood feels only a few steps removed from today’s reality. Yet unlike most women, I have found it hard to actually identify into a world where I, as a transgender woman, would already be dead.

The Handmaid’s Tale is set in Gilead, a near-future society where the political fallout of a worldwide infertility crisis and nuclear war led to a nonspecified religious sect gaining political control of America. In this society, fertile women are both venerated and subjugated. They become "handmaids" - a farmed resource, banned from reading and free movement, and subjected to ritualized rape and abuse. Any nonfertile women seen in the show are either torturing the handmaids or serve as housekeepers, as wives, or in other stereotypically domestic roles.

Under the new religious regime, people showing LGBT tendencies, such as having same-sex relationships, are immediately killed as “gender traitors” or sent to a nuclear wasteland to work until they die from radiation poisoning. The only exceptions are the handmaids, whose fertility is precious, and therefore they are protected from the death penalty. Yet this doesn’t stop them from being punished in horrific ways.

It’s not shocking that trans people aren’t represented in this world. Unlike many of our cisgender queer counterparts, transgender people who have started transitioning may find it very hard to go back into the closet to protect ourselves. We are sometimes very visibly transgender due to old-fashioned gender stereotypes that a society like Gilead heavily leans into. We trans people would quickly be branded “gender traitors.”

Even the fertility that protects other queer women in The Handmaid’s Tale may be out of reach for transgender people. Many trans people, especially trans women like myself, become sterile when they take hormones or have gender-confirmation surgery. Even more horrifying, in many countries around the world like Greece, Belgium, and Finland, trans people have to prove they are sterile before they can even change their gender markers. France only just outlawed this practice as inhumane last year.

With all this in mind, it becomes hard for me to identify within the world of The Handmaid’s Tale. How can I feel June’s terror at her situation when I know I would never face it myself? I can sympathize but not empathize with so many of the show's stories. This feeling of being left out can sometimes hurt, especially given the cultural significance that The Handmaid’s Tale has come to represent for a lot of women under the Trump administration.

That’s not to say that I demand trans representation in The Handmaid’s Tale like I do from other TV shows. The Handmaid’s Tale represents an important conversation we need to have about women’s place in the world. With Donald Trump’s attacks on women’s health organizations like Planned Parenthood, women’s reproductive health is very much at stake. It’s a crucial fight that I as a woman without a uterus don’t have the right to suppress. While I am a woman and will always fight for inclusion in women’s spaces, there are battles that cis women face that trans women don’t, and there are battles that cis women don’t face that trans women do. Yet we are all still women. We (should) all stand together to fight for and with each other.

The trans community’s exclusion from the futuristic narrative of The Handmaid’s Tale is understandable. It just becomes emblematic of the daily fears that I face. Every time I hear about the trans military ban, the Department of Education rescinding protections for trans students, a transgender bathroom bill being voted on, or another conservative rally screaming out, “There are only two genders!” I'm reminded that I and trans people like me would likely be the first ones to die if Gilead ever comes to pass.

Yet maybe The Handmaid’s Tale should address this. The series often presents flashbacks showing how Gilead came to be. Perhaps a trans person’s struggles could appear there. Or back in the future world of Gilead, what if a character identified as transgender in this world? How would they hide or suppress it? Or what if there was a “passing” infertile trans woman who desperately had to hide her trans identity from the government? Or a trans man still able to carry babies forced to be a handmaid despite being a man? Adding trans people to the narrative could complicate the story in new and interesting ways that draw attention to not only the oppression of all trans people, but all genders (#ImAvailableforaWritersRoomJob).

I’m preparing to binge every episode of The Handmaid’s Tale. The show’s lack of transgender characters, whether intentional or unintentional, brings up a lot of questions about what the future may hold for the trans community in a dystopian world. Even if a real Gilead comes to pass - and I don't make it through the first act - I still want to know how it ends. I'm just saddened that I may not get to join the fight."

OP posts:
BeyondParody · 10/05/2018 15:54

I'd always thought of the wives as transwomen. I wonder if this person would be happy with being represented in that way...?

RunRabbitRunRabbit · 10/05/2018 15:54

FFS. Random para of nonsense in the middle too.

While I am a woman and will always fight for inclusion in women’s spaces, there are battles that cis women face that trans women don’t, and there are battles that cis women don’t face that trans women do. Yet we are all still women.

As the author points out, men who transistioned to be transwomen would not be treated like women in Gilead so any mention of them could only be in flashback. In other words the author knows, just like everyone reading the article knows, that transwomen are not women, it's all pretend.

Ridiculous fluff.

Anyway, I'm off to write an article complaining that to Attwood that Handmaid didn't have enough women with a slightly dodgy achilles tendon on their left leg, which means I simply cannot identify with the story. Everyone hates me. Nobody lets me join in anything. It is so unfair. I hate you. Slams door dramatically. Comes down for dinner later anyway

HotRocker · 10/05/2018 15:54

Wow, make up your mind.
The show has no trans-women, just real women, so it doesn’t represent me, even though I am a real woman.
How can I be expected to identify and empathise with women because it’s something I’ve never experienced? Even though I am a real woman though.
Why should I be expected to care about the struggles and oppressions of women, because they are not my struggles? Even though I am one of course, you know, a woman, because I am definitely a proper real one.
Fucking hilarious, and pathetic. Some of these folk need to grow up and realise that the world does not revolve around them.

ISaySteadyOn · 10/05/2018 15:56

Did this person read the book at all? Or did they just watch the show and get annoyed that a story about female oppression based on biological reality didn't include them?

BeyondParody · 10/05/2018 15:59

I don't remember seeing any handmaids in wheelchairs.
Now I'm a great breeding machine, pregnant quick and easy (though pregnancy sucked) with relatively straightforward births. My legs aren't great, but I reckon I'd be a good handmaid - walking isn't an essential bit for popping out babies

Where's my representation Atwood? Huh? Huh? Angry

HotRocker · 10/05/2018 16:04

It’s ok, this person has offered, or Offred to become a script writer to ensure that they are properly represented in the show as they would wish. Maybe if this person could right all films, television shows and radio content they could ensure that they themselves were satisfied with their representation.
Such a kind and selfless suggestion.

shonkyklingonmakeup · 10/05/2018 16:07

I think it could be an interesting side story line. So, a trans man character could either be an econo-wife, handmaid, wife or Martha, based on his relative privilege before Gilead was formed.

As it's an allegory about the policing of the female reproductive system and sex based discrimination. Trans men who have not had any sort of surgery or those non-binary individuals with uteruses would just be forced into being some sort of women (or else sent to the colonies with the other unwomen, I guess).

It would go to show, you can't just identify yourself out of oppression.

Maybe they'd have secret trans women in Gilead but I have a feeling they'd only be Commanders. Drivers, Guardians and other workers would not have the privilege needed to get away with it for any length of time.

SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 10/05/2018 16:08

I mean, we could start the offers of script-writing with things that reflect real life and are chockfull of men, like Top Gear, HGINFY, QI..... or we could look at all the detective shows where men solve the crimes that put endless women on slabs, dead and naked.

But no, let's go to this drama about women's reproductive rights and demand that there is more representation of people ABOUT WHOM IT HAS FUCK ALL TO DO, right?

Nottheduchessofcambridge · 10/05/2018 16:10

What a weird way that person thinks! How can you be annoyed about not being represented in a series/film? Can you imagine all the Catholics/Muslims getting offended at Schindler’s list? Watching Titanic and complaining at the lack of drowning gay people? Well, I watched Avengers at the weekend and there is a distinct lack of short, slightly overweight Welsh Women. Fuming.

Xenia · 10/05/2018 16:13

it is just someone sounding off on a blog, yes the trans people would have been killed in that world; they would not have been commanders nor their wives and of course woudl have no reproductive use as it was only women breeders of which there was a shortage not male sperm.

I don't see any need to represent everyone. I think from the book the film should not really have had black characters either so may be there has already been pandering to political correctness? IN a real Gilead whites would prevail presumably. So in a sense the author already sold out to the black/trans/must include all lobby but it probably meant it made it more acceptable to TV companies and thus it gained a bigger reach than the original white supermacy claims of the awful men in it had been retained. Even so that alone was disappointing never mind were they to add trans people into it.

MrGHardy · 10/05/2018 16:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

bluescreen · 10/05/2018 16:17

There is probably fanfic that would cover it.Transfic.

SeekEveryEveryKnownHidingPlace · 10/05/2018 16:19

I suspect Atwood thought again about whether she really wanted an all-white Gilead and decided that to make that part of the aim of the coup would be to introduce too much in the TV series - are watching a show to terrify us about white supremacists, or about women's reproductive rights? I imagine she concluded, reasonably enough, that whilst in 1985 it had made sense that the new regime would ship out non-whites, she didn't want to go that way now.

I certainly wouldn't bracket a 'black lobby' with the trans lobby. I don't see the inclusion of non-white actors as being 'disappointing' or pandering to political correctness, and actually I don't think it's to do with inclusivity so much as it is about making the narrative centred on women, which the book clearly is even though it does suggest that black Americans have been deported.

An all-white dystopia would be a problematic thing to get us to empathise with - a dystopia in which women's bodies have become entirely commodity no matter what their race is much more engaging.

UpstartCrow · 10/05/2018 16:20

The show’s portrayal of a world that is dehumanizing, spiteful, and disgustingly violent toward womanhood feels only a few steps removed from today’s reality

Its not removed from reality at all. Everything in The Handmaid's Tale is happening to women - actual, live women, not 'womanhood' - somewhere in the world.

LikeAZombie · 10/05/2018 16:22

This is the crux of the matter for me. Womanhood is a biological fact not an identity that can be opted in and out of.
Can women and girls identify their way out of routine sexual intimidation, harassment and rape?
Can poor girls identify their way out of period poverty?
Can women and girls from certain cultures identify their way out of fgm?
Can any of us identity our way out of suffering from pmt pcos pnd women's cancers, infertility miscarriage traumatic births loss of earning when we are lucky enough to become mothers, being left holding the baby. The list of things I would love to be able to rid from my identity is long. But science. And socialisation.
Any Trans woman In gilead would be daft not to use that luxury and just opt out, back to the safety of being a man. After all most of them still have their dicks anyway

Rainydaydog · 10/05/2018 16:26

I don't know why this person thinks the story doesn't include them when all the gender traitors were murdered during the revolution. Surely that is a way of including them? Yes in this horrible future all known LGBT people were murdered and the remaining women were treated as slaves.

Barabajagal · 10/05/2018 16:31

I’d love to hear what Margaret Atwood thinks about such nonsense.

LangCleg · 10/05/2018 16:38

There'd possibly be room for them in Oryx and Crake...

Racecardriver · 10/05/2018 16:40

It does. They were all hanged in the first season along with the homosexuals, abortionists and, priests. I would have thought that was pretty obvious. What other possible role could they have in that narrative?

Mogleflop · 10/05/2018 16:44

Hah. Can you imagine the fucking backlash if she'd written in a new line saying "oh yes and all the trans people are murdered too"?

Also I don't think she specifically mentioned autistic people did she? Where's my personal fictional holocaust ending then Margaret?

BeyondParody · 10/05/2018 16:47

Hang on, there was no reference to the mn fwr board posters either... Ffs, we are all being literally erased! Angry

SimonBridges · 10/05/2018 16:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

R0wantrees · 10/05/2018 16:56

SimonBridges Its an article posted on 'Avocate' yesterday.

zzzzz · 10/05/2018 16:58

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SpareRibFem · 10/05/2018 17:00

Sigh I really thought it had to be a parody as the only other feasible option was author had extreme NPD

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.