These two tweets in particular are worryingly familiar:
"Here it describes the process of 'Jamming' - to shut down the thought process which would question this movement. Using social pressure, particularly targeting young 'progressives', to make debate unacceptable"
and
"It posits a shift from ‘Jamming’ to ‘Conversion’ – creating true allies to the cause. ‘Pedophobes’ need to see their friends & role models embracing ‘admitted kinds’ (paedophiles)."
I think what we're seeing is an issue of how to co-opt a particular political grouping's outlook to push things (hence the overlap between PIE and LGB rights, even though the latter was an entirely laudible and legitimate human rights movement). If a right wing pervert wants to access his victims, the natural way for him to do it is within the power structures and mechanisms of control the right wing affords him (overt, in-your-face power structures, the ability to produce institutional cover-ups - c.f. child abuse within the Catholic church, child abuse in children's homes). If a left wing pervert wants access to his victims, the natural way for him to do it is within the power structures and mechanisms of control the left wing affords him (a tendency to authoritarian group-think, the silencing of dissent by public shaming and show-trials).
This particular group of perverts happens to have latched onto some of the weaknesses of the left - a tendency to authoritarian group think - as an opening to exploit. They have that in common with a lot of other groups, some of whom have used this strategy to achieve good social change, some of whom have misused this strategy. But it's the strategy that's at issue.
Basically Machiavellian nasties read the strengths and weaknesses and institutional set-ups of their surrounding human beings very accurately and use whatever flaws are apparent in the system they happen to find htemselves in.