If I've interpreted this right, this is something I think we had - mostly - for a very long period of time - and it's the fecking TRA pink and blue brain brigade who changed it, in an incredibly short space of time.
I think men who don't like to associate with men who don't act like 'a normal bloke' have far more power in society than TRAs, and the pinkification of Marks and Spencers happened long before anybody had heard of Paris Lees, (And the vast majority of people in the UK have never heard of Paris Lees).
Some trans people are obviously very political, but I think politicians and media listen to them, not because they care about what they are saying, but because at root politicians and some media organisations have never really cared about women rights. They are a very easy target. TRAs certainly didn't start all the abusive behaviour that that has recently been made public in politics, and TRAs aren't responsible for the pay scale at the BBC or for sacking female presenters over a certain age.
Why not let somebody who appears to be vaguely progressive, in a way that is completely harmless to men, make policy on some equality nonsense?
Who? Me? Cos I'm in my 50s and I've pretty much been doing that since I was teenager. Nobody told me I had a gendered soul and must take testosterone otherwise I'd be a suicide risk. And I've led a remarkably happy life.
Good for you, but Hillary Clinton had to spend hours every day on her hair, make up and clothes, practising saying things in a voice that didn't sound too 'strident' or 'patronising', because God forbid any man should be made to feel that a woman knew more than they did.
Basically, I agree that society appears to be regressing, but I think progress was limited.
Having said all of the above, I am at a complete loss to understand why supposedly feminist politicians and journalists support trans activist ideology. Are they particularly susceptible to pressure to be 'nice'?