I am a single mum with two DC, one with additional needs, and I have three degrees.
The idea that being Uni-educated is a put down and way of silencing legitimate debate among women is fairly sinister, I think. It harks back to nineteenth century ideas that if one educated a woman, she would become ‘manly’, her ovaries would shrivel and this was no good for the future of the ‘race’. So by calling us uni-educated, it chimes with an old discourse that educated women are not ‘womanly’. That was meant negatively then and should be read negatively now. Not proper women.
On the other hand, educating a woman was seen as a waste of time because they would just have children and waste their education. Women were meant to be in the domestic sphere bringing up children. So again, the SAHM comment aligns with ideas that (biological) women’s place is in the home and therefore she should not speak on matters of public import. Whereas TIM’s are read as male, even when they are doing their best to outwoman in an advertiser’s dream fashion (and I don’t mean washing the whites whiter than white, but with the lipstick and heels), they are not doing the shit wife-work because they are not that kind of woman.
The final point is that Uni-educated being a slur aligns with push to shut down debate on campuses. If we have been taught critical thinking in relation to sex and gender, it is much more hard for our academic peers to teach the same to students today.