Bear in mind that if England moves to a 'presumed consent' organ donation system, as is proposed, it won't be a case of "I choose not to donate my uterus" it will be a case of, your womb is ours and you never stipulated otherwise.
This isn’t what the thread is about, but it’s really important to clarify that that’s not how a presumed consent system works at all, and scaremongering like that isn’t helpful.
The next of kin still need to agree to organ donation, it’s just that you start from the position that the person didn’t say they didn’t want to be a donor so we assume they want to be unless the next if Lin say otherwise. At no point do the organs “belong to the state”.
You simply cannot make such a categorical statement. There are hard and soft opt out options and you have no assurance to offer anyone for what you are asserting.
The whole point of opt out is that it removes any reference to the donor explicitly consenting, and passes the decision to the relatives OR the state. And once explicit donor consent is deemed unnecessary, any further changes can pass unopposed.
If you have some information supporting what you claim, please share. As far as I know all options are under consultation.
Either way, in an opt out system a donor's explicit wishes about their organs can be overridden by family and/or state if there is no record of those wishes on whatever database is proposed to keep the information.
No wish to scaremonger at all. These are genuine considerations for women around consent over their own bodies, alive and dead.