Yes, I was thinking about AWS / Trans officers / BAME shortlists...
If things are still the same as back in the day when I was at university, only a woman could stand for election as Women's Officer and only women could vote (we got given a separate ballot paper when we turned up to vote in the student union elections)
Is it the same with the trans officers that some CLP have (eg the constituency where LM is the Women's Officer)? Ie the candidate AND the electorate have to be trans? But who is the arbiter of eligibility? Presumably it's operated on an honour system so far, but the consequence of embracing self-ID is that someone who is not in anyway shape or form trans could stand for Trans Officer, whilst they surely couldn't deny anyone the right to vote for the trans officer because that would be "gate-keeping"
Similarly, as well as now apparently allowing anyone who says "but I'm a woman" to be included on AWS, the Labour party really ought to be allowing - for consistency - anyone who self-IDs as a woman to elect said Women's Officers. So men get to stand as Women's Officer and get to vote as well. Can anyone possibly see where this might all fall down...?
Never mind the all BAME officer proposal. How will they determine who is "black enough"? A sort of reverse "one drop" rule?
Who gets to select the BAME candidates - should this be restricted to BAME party officers too?