I like your idea Beltane18.
Yet another space & right for women has been lost and this is before the GRA passes. After the GRA will women be able to be in public anywhere without the presence of a man?
I was once taken to the women's swimming session at my local pool and the change in atmosphere was remarkable. It felt so relaxed and liberating.
It annoys me that the left is supporting the idea that it is fine for a man to define what a women is. That a man's feelings are more important than a women's. They see this as natural because of male supremacy, we have all been culturally groomed into patriarchy so it can be unconscious. As Andrea Dworkin wrote in Pornography (1981) 'The power of men is first a metaphysical assertion of self, an I am that exists a priori, a bedrock, absolute, no embellishment or apology required'. Women are denied this possibility, as shown by the trans narrative. Dworkin continued that 'it is naming by decree that is power over and against those who are forbidden to name their own experience'. Women have been so dehumanised that public policy now sees us as a costume, articles of clothing now define and express what was once part of our humanity.
The only importance wealth - (this is in response to other posters saying, I believe incorrectly, that it affects only rich white ladies) has in the Trans debate is looking at whose boundaries are not being stomped on. For example, Eton will now admit trans girls (biologically boys) but not girls who feel like boys (biologically girls), in law aristocratic inheritance will pass estates on to trans women (biologically male) but not trans men (biologically female). It appears that those with the wealth to afford to defend their rights can?