Having sex with transwomen is so much better than with those frigid women

[AskBasil]

transsingleblog.wordpress.com/2016/04/25/make-love-with-transgender-females/ Have a look at this. Look how much contempt for real women there is, on this site.

Women have horrible vaginas and we're frigid. Luckily there's transwomen who are much better, but don't worry guys, they're really real women, so you won't be gay if you fuck them.

This sounds hideous, but there is lots of ghastly bigoted nonsense on the Internet and I'm always wary of increasing its readership by drawing attention to it.

I have yet to met a transwomen who didn't dress and act like a complete parody of a women. I had a friend years ago who was trans and once asked me to show her how to walk/behave. She sacked me for being rubbish at it, not glamorises, and walk down the road as if I've got cloggs on. I just wasn't the sort of women she wanted to be.

As an aside, 'newly implanted vagina' if they have piv sex, and the man cums inside, how does that work? I'm thinking from a health pov. Female vaginas are self cleaning, do trans vaginas self clean? Sorry, off on a tangent.

Also weirdly fascinated by artificial vagina maintenance.

The article reads like something from Viz.

It's clearly been written by a moron, and one who reads as if they've never had sex. They seem to think that every single transwoman has the same personalty and the same body type. It's creepy wank fantasy stuff.

fakename no they dont self clean and have to be regularly "rinsed out" to remove all the horrible stuff that gathers in there

Wemust - I shouldn't have read that when I was eating should i

Some examples of things that are a “must” in a woman’s handbag include the following: hand sanitizer, feminine hygiene products (tampons), deodorant, a compact mirror, lip products, cash, safety pins, a notebook and a pen

Good grief. I'm as girly a girl as you could ask for and even I fail that test.

Although the article is obviously disgusting, your use of the term 'real women' is quite unfair. I don't think trans-exclusionary feminism is very helpful to anybody at all!

Well, it has been and is helpful to actual women, but apparently we are nobodies to you. Okay. Your opinion. You are entitled to it.

I have no problems with men objectifying and using transwomen for sex instead of women.
It's not like anyone would like having sex with the kind of person who would agree with that vile article.

I think given the article's raging misogyny then "real women" is absolutely spot on. The writer's phobia of real women's bodies and his own homosexuality drips from every toxic word

Safety pins? Really?

"If you went around the world collecting drips of misogyny in a bottle, then distilled it, turned it into ink, filled a fountain pen cartridge and wrote words, out would come this article"

Love this!

this thread is revolting. i really don't understand how this sort of hate-filled invective isn't banned as transphobia.

properly shameful.

And what do you think of the hideously misogynist article Exwife?

I take it that's just dandy because a transwoman who has zero idea of what being a woman is wrote it?

No comments about that?

Nah, didn't think so.

exWife are you confused? Did you read the article? Did you not see what it was saying?

Buffy you win at being a woman!! Are you nice and submissive in bed? I hope your vag is lovely and "fresh" and you haven't done any of that disgusting bleeding or birthing that ruins it for fucking.

Yes exwife did you read the article?

Or just wanted an excuse to jump in here and froth about how transphobic we are?

You do realise that the article is claiming that transwoman are better women than those born? That transwomen are happy to be dominated and put into their rightful place unlike us natural born women?

It's not clear to me what gender the writer is.
I assumed it was a male (born male /currently male)

Hate filled invective?

To link to a site for trans dating?

I think the article is hate-filled, against women.

But gynophobia is OK isn't it, ex-wife.

Also to describe as transphobia, female revulsion about deep misogyny, a) is a bloody cheek - we have the right to be angry about male hatred of our real, biological bodies and b) is insulting to transpeople who would agree with us that this article is vile.

You would like Mumsnet to ban this, so that women can't see what woman-haters are doing and thinking and writing and so don't organise to stop them eroding our rights.

You don't actually have an argument against this, just a demand that it be put a stop to because shedding light on what's going on, is dangerous to the misogyny agenda.

Women must be silenced. Shout transphobia and hope that happens.

That's a hell of an article.
Manages to insult transwomen, born women, gay men, bisexual men and straight men in a few short paragraphs

I wasn't offended by the article as such, other than the thought that the women ( I refuse to use the term 'cis') I've either been in relationships with or had casual sex with are frigid. In my experience they were more than enthusiastic. I reckon whoever wrote the blog post has either never had sex with a woman or was so shit no woman asked him for seconds.

Buffy is spot on as ever. :o

What is with the knee jerk accusations of transphobia that always come up in these threads? It's just a way to silence women, I'm glad more and more people are seeing through it. There has been no hatred towards trans people at all in this thread. Women taking issue with the misogyny shown in that article and acknowledging that biology exists is not transphobia.

Oh yes, shouting "transphobia" is the new way to silence women.

Want to talk about rape, FGM, periods, DV, pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding? Tough, it's transphobic.

Now apparently wanting to discuss raging misogyny is also transphobic.