Lurcio, thanks for posting the TED talk, it was really interesting.
Paraphrase: "personal greatness" (your manner) is only a third of what you need.
Advice to women is skewed towards this. A man who mentored a woman and a man admitted later that he had helped the woman with her confidence and manner and taught the man the business.
Men can't stop seeing women as people-people. All the advice they are given is about their manner, about how to make the people around them feel comfortable.
I find this fascinating. Is this because the role of women (at work, at home) has traditionally been about taking care of people, their relationships to people, and a successful woman has always traditionally a woman who makes the people around her feel good, by being attractive, warm, and generally nice to have around? (I remember the time I asked for feedback after not getting a job after 3 interviews and was told about 3 times "it was very close between you and the other candidate." I asked: ok so what was the difference that decided it, or what should I work on? no answer, no answer, no answer, until finally "we all thought you were a lovely girl but we decided to give it to the other candidate." I was about 32 at this point when I was a "lovely girl".) Is it just impossible for the world to see women as instrumental to their feelings; as either "makes me feel nice" or "doesn't make me feel nice"; as either "a lovely girl" or "DO NOT WANT"?
Is it because on some some level men don't want to "let women into the secret"?
Is it because on some level men don't believe women can handle the hard stuff?
I find it really interesting and it has really only tweaked my thinking about my own stagnant career a notch.
Where my thinking was: I have potential but I have not persuaded the people around me to give me opportunities, training, go for the big stuff. This is a failure of my persona (within a context of systemically ingrained sexism); had I been a man, or managed my persona better as a woman, I could have done more; to some extent my good work has not been recognised
Where my thinking is now: I have (or had) potential but I have never really done anything excellent. I have not been trusted or mentored to try. There is not enough difference between my work and that of the next person and that is just a fact however I might complain about why that is. At the moment the volume of mundane work that I am saddled with is so great, so stressful, and so boring, that I simply do not have time to challenge anything or change anything; this is structurally deliberate, I am sitting within a relatively new structure that has been set up on the basis that the person sitting at my desk will be a work horse without aspiration, or time to have any
Those things are subtly different but not different enough to make any difference to me