Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Separatist Feminism

1002 replies

VictorGollancz · 15/07/2011 08:37

Ok, I really am really very late for work at this point but I thought it might be nice to have a space in which we can discuss separatist feminism. I've read a lot of advocates of it, and even incorporate some elements of it into my own life - I prefer not to live with men, for example - but I don't practise it totally and I can't find any examples of any separatist communes.

Does anyone know anything more about it? Does anyone live in a separatist way?

Surprisingly good Wiki link here

OP posts:
Truckrelented · 21/07/2011 19:56

In this new utopia,

I think all the males should have a large P somehow imprinted on their foreheads. (think Rimmer from Red Dwarf)

This will remind them of Privilige, Patriarchy and Penis.

When they reach 18 if they want to stay and are fully accepted into the community, the P is removed, at the Peeing off ceremony.

If they arent P'd off at this point they are sent back to the mundanes and the men and the wonderful world of cricket, pubs and Sky sports news.

DontCallMePeanut · 21/07/2011 19:59

Cyprus hasn't been invaded for a few years... We'll take the northern part first, then kick the rest of the island out. Grin deal? Yes? We'll take Cyprus then

Anyone got a Greek warship?

LeninGrad · 21/07/2011 20:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

swallowedAfly · 21/07/2011 20:00

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

DontCallMePeanut · 21/07/2011 20:06

That said, aren't there a few uninhabited Greek Islands?

I know a bit of Greek. Grin Mainly "please", "thank you", and "goodbye, wanker"

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 20:38

why would women be necessarily more equitable to each other than men/women interactions?essentially enduring human traits and characteristics would be enacted. both favorable and unfavorable traits would be enacted.

it is an oft touted premise that women would be nicer,more equitable and create a fairer social community.

why??

doesn't this in fact tap into stereotypes that women are more nurturing, home and community makers

face it the same tensions that beset any group would be present.gender wouldn't protect or ameliorate from such human tensions.

swallowedAfly · 21/07/2011 20:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 20:42

there is not an absence of female dysfunction
deluded and lalala to assert live in wimmins world would be more harmonious
and stereotypical notion of all goddesses getting along

swallowedAfly · 21/07/2011 20:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 20:47

that was humour?dearie me
what do you do for an encore
i dont often advocate use of wee humphy faces but you should use :oWink to be v clear youre trying to be funny
not obvious

Malificence · 21/07/2011 20:50

My 21 year old DD has been assaulted 3 times, twice in High school and once this year, every time it was young women / girls who attacked her.
There are just as many violent young women around as there are young men.
Young women are more at risk from other young women , just as young men are at more risk from other young men.

HerBeX · 21/07/2011 21:00

Sorry Mal, the crime figures simply don't back up that statement. There aren't as many violent young women as young men around, there simply aren't. That's why most prisoners are men, not women.

Also I think we need to remember than anyone wanting to join a separatist community, isn't actually going to be a bog-standard violent Prisoner H Block wannabe, are they? I mean, women like that probably wouldn't be that attracted by the idea of separatist living where they might have to be respectful of their fellow beings or get kicked out of the commune.

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 21:25

yes less females convicted than males of violent acts.but this in itself isnt an absence of female dysfynction.

i struggle with this notion that women together = better or more harmonious. only got to look at mn to see female majority isnt necessarily shared ideologies or harmonious.the fundamentals of child reaering, mode of feeding and what constitutes good parenting is what habitually causes aggro on mn

in any rl situation tension from living and working together,personality and ideological clashes would still be prevalent. as would ability to be collaborative and collective.but cannot deny discord or minimise it just because its women

HerBeX · 21/07/2011 21:36

Yes but generally women don't beat each other up because they disapprove of each other's Greggs' choices or ear-piercing of children, SM.

No-one's saying that women aren't nasty to each other easy, that's not what the discussion's about. It's about separatism as an experiment. A terribly threatening one, apparantly.

I've no interest whatsoever in living without men; I really enjoy shagging some of them. However, if other women want to try it, I'm perfectly happy to support their choice. I'm not remotely threatened by it.

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 21:39

this habitual ach but women dont do dis and dat,is frankly bizarre
the prevalence may be less.yes.but women do perpetrate aggression
i struggle with the women= more harmonious.its sterotypical

HerBeX · 21/07/2011 21:39

But nobody's said women = more harmonious.

Except you.

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 21:42

but its the whole global premise of single sex living is it would be better
freedom from male hegemony,violence etc as sistas wouldnt do that

HerBeX · 21/07/2011 21:43

And it's not bizarre to look at population figures and say women do dis, men do dat, in your parlance.

Demographic data is a perfectly reasonable thing to look at, nobody intelligent thinks it means everyone in that group does xyz, of course group overviews don't always translate to individual circumstances.

HerBeX · 21/07/2011 21:45

Well maybe it would, maybe it wouldn't SM.

No-one knows as it hasn't been tried on an enormous scale.

Don't panic, I don't think Cameron's going to introduce an edict that declares all women over 25 have to go and live in an all female commune. Everyone can calm down and carry on with their normal lives, there's nothing to worry about.

LeninGrad · 21/07/2011 21:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 21:46

nonetheless,reduced prevalence isnt absence
so simply because males commit more aggression doesn't mean women commit none

LeninGrad · 21/07/2011 21:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LeninGrad · 21/07/2011 21:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

HerBeX · 21/07/2011 21:47

Nobody has said that though.

Again, you are arguing things which have never been asserted.

Why?

scottishmummy · 21/07/2011 21:52

its a global discussion i dont need to cite a mn quote before i can assert an opinion.you see thats how discussion goes,i dont need to wait on a mn word on screen for me to explore a discussion.and think you'll find that's how most mn threads go

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread