SGM - I'm not sure that based on the information we have from Bristol, that it was necessarily rape under UK law.
A quote from the Guardian article Alice linked (thanks Alice, interesting article, just cut out the insults and we can have a decent discussion) this:
" ^Ruairi Dougal, who had sex with a drunken fellow student, was cleared of rape charges on the basis that "drunken consent is still consent".
Sir Igor said that the outcry after the case was based on a misunderstanding. "All that was being said was that when someone who has had a lot to drink is in fact consenting to intercourse, then that is what she is doing, consenting. Equally, if after taking drink, she is not consenting, then by definition intercourse is taking place without her consent^ "
We know she had no memory of it in the morning when she awoke, but we don't know if when she sobered up, she remembered in a regretful haze as is so common (not a good thing, but not rape if she consented)
Under UK law, drunken consent is still consent. Men know whether or not there is consent, it's not difficult. We don't know if Levi raped her, and I maintain that as there is a hell of a lot more drunken consensual sex occurs than rape, the likelihood is that she drunkenly consented.