If we must.
"You say the women you met in academia were "open to other views" as if that was the most important thing in a feminist.
Generally, I find, if you want to have a debate with someone, you have to listen to what they say, rather than dismissing them out of hand. If you start from the premise that anyone with an alternative viewpoint is disgusting and rather insensitve even to mention it, and either misguided, oppressed or ignorant, it doesn't generally bode well for constructive debate.
I judge feminists by how interested they are in in freeing women from sexist oppression.
I missed the election where you got declared Queen Fem, I suppose? Don't be so arrogant. Other feminists aren't necessarily signed up to your definition of sexist oppression. If you listened to people more, you might find other women have ideas of their own.
If you think aobut it logically being "open to other views" could mean being open to misogyny and anti-feminism - so it's not the greatest attribute to have as a feminist.
Yes - you are so right... listening to other people .. very bad... 
Feminism is a political movement not an academic debate."
No, it is both.
This is getting rather silly. I'm really not trying to personalise this at all. I appreciate there is some reason that you are distrustful or irritated with academic feminists, and I really don't have a clue what it is.. nor really the will or the grasp of recent developments in feminist theory to defend it.
I can only say, Catherine Mackinnon - who you seem to admire - is an academic feminist too. And in my own experience, Feminist discussion groups in Universitites in 1998 were a hell of a lot more supportive and friendlier places than here.