You know, Milly, your response to my response is exactly what puts me off (and I guess others) too). I tried to write a clear and respectful post where I explained that I'd felt under attack by you.
Your response was not to say sorry for the effect you'd had on me, whether intentional or not. It was to ridicule me. And as it happens, you got your facts wrong while you did so.
Cos you said: "In my view, you didn't put that it was merely your view that there is a value in FAQ."
But my original post said:
"However, I think that there's always room for improvement. My personal wish-list would currently include:
I have highlighted the places where I specifically did express that it was merely my view that there was value in a FAQ.
I didn't say I wanted to write a FAQ. I said I'd like there to be a FAQ. I said I couldn't do it myself as I didn't have the skills, but I did post some ideas about topics that could be useful.
I don't see what I did that would possibly justify your choosing to express yourself in such hostile terms to me. What did I do? If, for some reason, you don't think you expressed yourself in hostile terms to me, let me tell you -- that's not how it felt from over here.
Many thanks to the others who have said they like the idea.