My daughter recently got engaged and is planning her wedding. Her future husband has said he's not bothered about getting married "it's just a piece of paper" but that she can have whatever she wants - big or small. They have a small dog they want to include at the ceremony (not thrilled at the idea as the dog isn't well trained, but fine; it's what they want). Now future son-in-law says that his whole family will also be bringing their dogs as well - all large breeds including a German Shepherd who will be about a year old at the time they are planning the wedding ie a young lively dog. Having been bitten by a German Shepherd as a child and nervous around big dogs I'm not happy about the situation. I did a lot of research on venues in the belief it would be helpful (my daughter has a new and stressful job) but accepted the choice would be theirs, not mine and was prepared to pay a big chunk of the wedding bill. My husband has already said to them that we won't be comfortable at a wedding with lots of dogs (my daughter's dog bit him as a puppy and he needed tetanus/antibiotics etc) but my future son-in-law insists that they are part of the family.
I read a lot of posts here about 'interfering/controlling' in-laws and I guess that's how my future son-in-law sees me. I might add that my husband and I gave £40,000 to them as a deposit for the house, my daughter put in £30,000 from her savings and my son-in-law put in a big fat zero yet the house is owned by them jointly. I get that entitles me to nothing as it was a 'gift' but how about a little bit of respect (a thank you also might be nice!) Why can't his parents/siblings get a dog minder for their dogs for a day? Am I being unreasonable? Is it better to say nothing more and just let them get on and stay out of any organising (going to add that my daughter suffers from anxiety, and will struggle with researching/organising on her own) and just let them pay for it?