Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

UK travel

Welcome to our UK travel forum where you can get advice on everything from holidays to exotic destinations, to tips on London travel.

Airport security discarded ALL my frozen expressed milk before our flight

741 replies

Nadsthakur · 12/07/2026 01:40

During security screening, approximately 25 ounces of my frozen expressed breast milk was confiscated and discarded. I was told that because it was frozen, it could not be tested and therefore could not be taken through security.

I explained several times that this milk was for my 8-month-old daughter, who is unable to latch and is exclusively fed expressed breast milk. This was not simply a drink or an inconvenience, it was my daughter's only prepared source of nutrition for our journey. Despite explaining this, I was told there was nothing that could be done, and I had to stand there and watch as the milk was thrown away.

I cannot put into words how upsetting this was. Expressing 25 ounces of breast milk takes an enormous amount of time, dedication and physical effort. It means pumping throughout the day and night, carefully storing every bottle and planning ahead. Every ounce represents hours of work. To have it thrown away in front of me, after explaining exactly how important it was, was absolutely heartbreaking.

What made the situation even worse was the attitude of the officers involved. Throughout the interaction, I felt they showed very little empathy or understanding of how serious this was. I was clearly distressed and repeatedly explained that they were taking away my baby's only food for our journey. Rather than trying to help, showing compassion or explaining whether there were any alternative screening options, my concerns were simply dismissed.

After my daughter's food had been thrown away, I was handed a customer feedback card and sent on my way. It genuinely felt as though nobody cared that an 8-month-old baby had just lost the only food I had prepared for her. The complete lack of compassion shown towards me as a mother was deeply upsetting and made an already distressing situation even worse.

Instead of looking forward to our holiday, I boarded an international flight feeling anxious and devastated, worrying about how I was going to feed my daughter while we were away. No parent should ever be put in that position.

Before travelling, I checked the guidance available to passengers. Ryanair's website clearly states that parents travelling with an infant can bring as much baby milk as needed for the flight, provided it is presented for inspection. I relied on this information when preparing for our journey. At no point was I made aware that frozen expressed breast milk could be refused because it could not be tested, and I was given no alternative option when I reached security.

I do not know the names of the officers involved, but im sure they can be identified through CCTV footage and staff rosters for the security checkpoint.
I want Manchester Airport to provide a full explanation of why my daughter's expressed breast milk was confiscated.
The specific policy or security procedure that required it to be discarded.
An explanation of why no alternative screening method. The time and physical effort it took to express and store it, and the significant distress, anxiety and disruption this caused to both me and my family.im supposed to enjoy my holiday and now im stressed in morroco about how I will feed her. She doesnt latch and only has expressed milk. Besides complaining to the Airport what else can I do so no other family goes through this.

Airport security discarded ALL my frozen expressed milk before our flight
OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
PhaedraTwo · 12/07/2026 10:22

Spottyvases · 12/07/2026 06:22

Oh - it seems like a pile on to the OP (yet again - this is Mumsnet after all)

I'm not going to join in.

Instead I'm going to say that all common sense has left the world.

What type of explosive or dangerous substance can be frozen first??

I don't know but I'd guess the Civil Aviation Authority and the bodies charged with protecting airline security for all planes and passengers do. I think I'd trust them over some random MN poster.

allthewa · 12/07/2026 10:22

1WhiffyGrowler · 12/07/2026 10:20

Write to your local MP, Andy Burnham King of the North, the papers, the local radio, The BBC. Guarantee if you shame them you will get a proper apology and just might affect change, especially if your bringing this to light encourages other mums to talk about their poor experiences at the airport. And if you do, be sure to come back in here and post your links where other mums can see, I've already seen one other mum concur with your experience below. Really they should take a measured risk based approach rather than broad brush for everyone. Is an obvious mum carrying a baby with small bottles REALLY like to be a terrorist??! If airports and security could be bothered, they would make sure their passengers were properly cared for and could have special dispensation forms to allow them to carry breast milk. Also I thought many airports carry special scan equipment (sure I had this at Stansted) which means they don't even need to dip test liquids now (which can be a source of stress for everyone not just mums!!) so Manchester is clearly behind the times!!

Get real

Powerbungalow · 12/07/2026 10:22

Bigcat25 · 12/07/2026 04:18

Sorry op this is absolutely ridiculous and pointless security theatre.

Well thank you mr/s security expert. Best you share your vast airport security knowledge with Manchester airport, they'll be glad of your advice I'm sure.

Biscuit
Pinkchickenwine · 12/07/2026 10:22

CatkinToadflax · 12/07/2026 09:36

Not long after 9/11 I was held up at Stansted while security demanded to know why I had a large knife in my bag. They repeated the phrase ‘large knife’ so many times that I was nearly starting to believe that somehow something resembling an axe had made its way into my hand luggage without me realising. They then opened my bag and triumphantly pulled out…. a hairbrush with a thick handle. They didn’t apologise.

Security staff do generally seem to be ‘in the zone’ and lacking in empathy…. however OP in your case it seems that they followed airport/governmental rules and did nothing wrong. I hope you enjoy your trip.

I imagine they were on very high alert at that stage, with very anxious passengers, whilst being anxious themselves.

The unthinkable had happened, it wasn’t beyond the bounds of expectation that another unthinkable could happen.

Stress can come out in many ways.

Nanda66 · 12/07/2026 10:24

BakedPotatoBeansCheeseColeslaw · 12/07/2026 09:31

No, because my things were taken away with no explanation. There was nothing wrong with them and I was made to feel like some kind of terrorist. I simple explanation of what they were doing, where they were taking my things, why and when I would get them back would have gone a long way. Airport security lines are stressful enough.

Honestly, this is normal, you’re not being singled out. I travel a lot and am often swabbed or have things taken for testing. It keeps us all safe.

thereisnomeaning · 12/07/2026 10:24

RocketLollyPolly · 12/07/2026 10:16

Did you ask to defrost it so it could be tested? If it was in bags of smaller amounts it shouldn’t have taken long under a tap. Then you could have used it on the flight and - if kept at fridge temp with ice etc - for a few days.

You'd have to defrost every sample for testing though.

Blushingm · 12/07/2026 10:25

If it was frozen how was she going to have it on the flight? Regulations allow enough for the flight

Charmatt · 12/07/2026 10:25

As PP have advised, the information on the government website is clear and a straight forward internet search would have told you the same.
Despite your upset, this is your mistake and you need to own it, otherwise you will spoil your holiday.
Security staff are exactly that - they are there to ensure the security and safety of all. They are trained to carry out a serious border role and they are not there to be distracted, take exceptions or be fluffy - their role can be life or death.

Sorry you made a mistake - I hope your daughter is ok.

BakedPotatoBeansCheeseColeslaw · 12/07/2026 10:26

Skyflier · 12/07/2026 10:17

But it is the rules!!!

The problem is, and why people get annoyed, is that the rules don’t make sense.

Like how you can only bring things in 100ml bottles. Doesn’t matter than it’s a 125ml that is half full (so obviously 100ml or less), or that you have decanted 500ml into 5 100ml containers. It doesn’t suddenly make it safer and it’s all a bit arbitrary.

No one is against safety in aviation but they would do well to focus on the things that actually make things safer for people and to develop to internal consistent logic.

happidayss · 12/07/2026 10:26

Nanda66 · 12/07/2026 10:24

Honestly, this is normal, you’re not being singled out. I travel a lot and am often swabbed or have things taken for testing. It keeps us all safe.

Yes this has happened to me a few times. I don’t take it personally

Monty36 · 12/07/2026 10:27

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

ThatCyanCat · 12/07/2026 10:28

allthewa · 12/07/2026 10:22

Get real

Check the username and decide how real it is...

Blushingm · 12/07/2026 10:28

1WhiffyGrowler · 12/07/2026 10:20

Write to your local MP, Andy Burnham King of the North, the papers, the local radio, The BBC. Guarantee if you shame them you will get a proper apology and just might affect change, especially if your bringing this to light encourages other mums to talk about their poor experiences at the airport. And if you do, be sure to come back in here and post your links where other mums can see, I've already seen one other mum concur with your experience below. Really they should take a measured risk based approach rather than broad brush for everyone. Is an obvious mum carrying a baby with small bottles REALLY like to be a terrorist??! If airports and security could be bothered, they would make sure their passengers were properly cared for and could have special dispensation forms to allow them to carry breast milk. Also I thought many airports carry special scan equipment (sure I had this at Stansted) which means they don't even need to dip test liquids now (which can be a source of stress for everyone not just mums!!) so Manchester is clearly behind the times!!

I had my baby and stroller swabbed

And it’s not just terrorism - there’s also drugs. A parent with a child doesn’t appear suspicious which is why they might be targeted by smugglers to be mules. People have smuggled drugs in to prisons in their own child’s nappy on visits

openended · 12/07/2026 10:28

I appreciate you are distressed and I feel for you. however as well as checking airline rules you must check those of the Airport you are flying from.

The airport staff are not being jobsworth but I appreciate inlight of your distress they could have been more sensitive and better at explaining.

Do not allow the upsetting start to your holiday to overshadow it.

notatinydancer · 12/07/2026 10:28

kkloo · 12/07/2026 03:22

The security officers didn't do anything wrong.

Manchester airport should make it clear on their website though and I'm not sure why they haven't done so, surely this issue has arisen plenty of times.

2 second Google.

likelysuspect · 12/07/2026 10:31

BakedPotatoBeansCheeseColeslaw · 12/07/2026 10:26

The problem is, and why people get annoyed, is that the rules don’t make sense.

Like how you can only bring things in 100ml bottles. Doesn’t matter than it’s a 125ml that is half full (so obviously 100ml or less), or that you have decanted 500ml into 5 100ml containers. It doesn’t suddenly make it safer and it’s all a bit arbitrary.

No one is against safety in aviation but they would do well to focus on the things that actually make things safer for people and to develop to internal consistent logic.

The rules dont have to make sense to you, either follow them or dont fly. Flying is not a human right.

Blushingm · 12/07/2026 10:32

Nadsthakur · 12/07/2026 02:17

She is being weaned but shes not really a big eater. Would only have few spoons of food. Mainly milk. Ive never given her formula. I had just enough for two feeds then I would need to express again. But travelling isn't easy with 3 other young kids too.

You said she has 4oz but you had 25oz so more than 2 feeds? And it was frozen so couldn’t have been used on the plane?

You made a mistake - you haven’t read the regulations. Or you wanted them to bend the rules for you and then got pissed off when they wouldn’t? Airport/airline security is tight and strict for a reason.

Monty36 · 12/07/2026 10:33

Spottyvases · 12/07/2026 06:22

Oh - it seems like a pile on to the OP (yet again - this is Mumsnet after all)

I'm not going to join in.

Instead I'm going to say that all common sense has left the world.

What type of explosive or dangerous substance can be frozen first??

And that shouldn’t be acceptable nor considered ‘normal’. The Pile on.
I know people can report but it doesn’t seem sufficient. I have seen threads dry up because of a pile on. Or because a row has taken place between two posters and they dominate the thread.

Bewareofstepfords · 12/07/2026 10:33

Mumtobabyhavoc · 12/07/2026 05:20

She explained why she thought that.
Again, why wasn't an alternative offered?

OP needs to acquire better research skills and to concentrate on what she's reading when, as in this case, it's really important to do so.

Buttonspoons · 12/07/2026 10:34

Notrainingbutpouring · 12/07/2026 10:17

none of these ideas work… apart from that one which means the first part of that sentence isn’t correct. also, you didn’t ask what she should have done in the moment, you asked how could someone not resort to formula. I gave you several suggestions and it’s fine if you don’t want to use them or if they wouldn’t work for you, but dismissing them because they take a little bit of forward planning is unfair. It’s like saying the suggestion to bring the appropriately sized luggage is ridiculous and you want a solution to carry a bigger bag on board that is permitted!

If you’re asking in the moment what I would have done, I would have asked could I let them defrost and purchase one of those travel mugs and popped it in there. Baby is also weaned so I would have given sips of water and food for plane and pumped immediately after getting through security.

If you’re asking in the moment what I would have done

That's what I did ask, yes. You misread my post and gave suggestions for an advanced planning. No trouble, just a simple mistake.

likelysuspect · 12/07/2026 10:34

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

But they dont need to 'care', its not their role, they're not selling a product or providing a service as part of public services, they need to do their job swiftly, dispassionately and follow their procedures. They dont need to be smiley and jokey and 'there there', this isnt that circumstance. And this was of the OPs own doing, its not some mistake on their part, she has inconvenienced herself and them.

sittingonabeach · 12/07/2026 10:34

1WhiffyGrowler · 12/07/2026 10:20

Write to your local MP, Andy Burnham King of the North, the papers, the local radio, The BBC. Guarantee if you shame them you will get a proper apology and just might affect change, especially if your bringing this to light encourages other mums to talk about their poor experiences at the airport. And if you do, be sure to come back in here and post your links where other mums can see, I've already seen one other mum concur with your experience below. Really they should take a measured risk based approach rather than broad brush for everyone. Is an obvious mum carrying a baby with small bottles REALLY like to be a terrorist??! If airports and security could be bothered, they would make sure their passengers were properly cared for and could have special dispensation forms to allow them to carry breast milk. Also I thought many airports carry special scan equipment (sure I had this at Stansted) which means they don't even need to dip test liquids now (which can be a source of stress for everyone not just mums!!) so Manchester is clearly behind the times!!

Mums can take expressed breastmilk in hand luggage but it has to be in liquid form (as explained by many forms of guidance)

SweepSqueaks · 12/07/2026 10:35

BakedPotatoBeansCheeseColeslaw · 12/07/2026 10:26

The problem is, and why people get annoyed, is that the rules don’t make sense.

Like how you can only bring things in 100ml bottles. Doesn’t matter than it’s a 125ml that is half full (so obviously 100ml or less), or that you have decanted 500ml into 5 100ml containers. It doesn’t suddenly make it safer and it’s all a bit arbitrary.

No one is against safety in aviation but they would do well to focus on the things that actually make things safer for people and to develop to internal consistent logic.

But that does make sense.

That’s so that the person who works at the airport does not have to look at a bottle and estimate how much is in there. Nor do they have to negotiate with the passenger who says that it’s under 100mls in a 200mls bottle which works take time.

If every third passenger had to have their bottles estimated then it would take even longer to get through security. And people would get cross.

So the answer is, everything in 100ml bottles or smaller for efficiency and to stop arguments.

BakedPotatoBeansCheeseColeslaw · 12/07/2026 10:36

SweepSqueaks · 12/07/2026 10:35

But that does make sense.

That’s so that the person who works at the airport does not have to look at a bottle and estimate how much is in there. Nor do they have to negotiate with the passenger who says that it’s under 100mls in a 200mls bottle which works take time.

If every third passenger had to have their bottles estimated then it would take even longer to get through security. And people would get cross.

So the answer is, everything in 100ml bottles or smaller for efficiency and to stop arguments.

But that doesn’t answer the question of why bringing 200ml of radox is dangerous but 100ml is okay

Mookie81 · 12/07/2026 10:37

likelysuspect · 12/07/2026 10:18

They double up as parenting support officers, didnt you know!!!

There are some spectacularly thick posts on this thread, some of the worst Ive seen, comparing testing for frozen products with that of laptop screening, offering suggestions to just wait around to a defrost a batch of the milk to test it, yeah that'll be fine, chip a bit off of the frozen milk, wondering if frozen breast milk is a problem because it looks like semtex

Jesus, dont these people understand anything?

The amount of absolute fucking idiots that post on here is crazy.
To think, they're eligible for jury duty!