Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

30 days only

(how) would you respond to this punishment from school?

107 replies

catonthebeds · 30/06/2026 18:42

DS is in Yr9, no issues with behaviour up to this point. Had a call today from a teacher to let me know he had made an inappropriate gesture in class today - she described it as he made a "simulated oral sex" gesture to a friend. This has been classed as inappropriate sexualised language and DS has been given a level 3 sanction - a day in the 'reflection room'. This is the level below an exclusion.

She explained the decision to award level 3 was the decision of the head of year, and also that my son had claimed not to know what the gesture was. So as not to drip feed, the lesson was a history lesson on Section 28 so she said this added to her judgement that it was particularly inappropriate as could be reflecting homophobia. I haven't spoken to my son yet as he is at a club, however he has messaged me on the way to tell me he has a detention (obviously he doesn't know it's actually a L3) and he thinks he shouldn't have one because he says he was copying a friend to ask what the gesture meant - I am dubious of that excuse TBH, but I do think he wasn't being intentionally homophobic.

I felt on the call that a day in reflection room was perhaps a bit harsh for what DS did in itself (though appreciate that the extra context of the lesson topic means the it could be viewed as more offensive). Regardless, my basic assumption on behaviour is that parents should support the school. Both teachers involved have always been positive about DS in the past so I figured - this is their call, they are making it based on their professional judgement and knowledge of the behaviour policy, not from any ill will to him. So I told her thanks for letting me know, we'd support their decision.

However now I am fretting a bit, as I do think a full day out of lessons is pretty harsh. I don't know if it's even worth raising with the head of year as, having looked at the policy, there is no lower sanction for inappropriate sexualised language. I can't work out if it goes on his record in a more permanent way than a standard detention.

I never wanted to be that parent who kicks up a fuss for their special child, but faced now with something that feels unfair a big bit of me wants to argue on his behalf for a different sanction or at least work out how long it will be on his record and if it will impact a trip he is booked in on for next academic year (and argue that it shouldn't, if it does).

I think I want someone to either remind me that he has to accept the consequences and give me some pre-emptive resolve to deal with his complaints when he realises the actual punishment. Or, to tell me that actually yes I should stand up for him because it is a harsh punishment. but how would I do that, is it even worth challenging or do I just end up damaging our relationship with the staff?

OP posts:
Fiddlesticks1 · 02/07/2026 07:58

LilOleMe2 · 02/07/2026 00:19

You are wasting your time agonising over what to do, because it is out of your hands. They decide the punishment and they dont have to have your agreement.

It’s called a sanction/ consequence not a punishment.

WhatNoRaisins · 02/07/2026 08:06

For what it's worth OP if the sanction was something a lot harsher like being banned from a school trip or isolation for a week I'd feel differently. I think that some people just relish punishing teenagers and that's not the right approach either. This feels proportionate to me.

Rescuedog12 · 02/07/2026 08:26

SirChenjins · 01/07/2026 20:04

I imagine he was simulating giving a blow job - if you've ever seen Bridesmaids it's the thing Kristen Wiig does when she's working in the jewellery shop.

I agree it's harsh OP, and imo a sharp word plus a request for him to explain his action given the lesson context would have been a better opportunity for reflection, but it is what it is. No point in fighting it. Will it stop him and his mates doing these kind of gestures? I doubt it - but hopefully they'll save them for the playground from now on.

Lol.thats my favourite film but I don't remember that bit.good excuse for me to rewatch.

Rescuedog12 · 02/07/2026 14:02

NuffSaidSam · 01/07/2026 20:09

I'm assuming the internationally recognised 'blow job' gesture?

And what's that?

NuffSaidSam · 02/07/2026 14:14

Rescuedog12 · 02/07/2026 14:02

And what's that?

Have a look at Bridesmaids, the scene in the jewellery shop. Kristen Wiig gives a lovely demonstration. Or have a google. It's quite visual! Hard for me to describe to you here 😂

Jane379 · 10/07/2026 02:20

KateSixer · 30/06/2026 19:04

I just think you have and he had to accept the punishment. There is no point battling the school.

Tbh I am way more concerned given the incredible range of genuinely fascinating British and global historical topics that could be studied that some strange person has decided s28 should be at the top of the list!

Not that I am in any way anti gay. But it's just so virtue signalling. I am fascinated to know what would happen if a child wrote an essay supporting the s28 legislation. Would they get excluded for this too?!

Why is Section 28 not interesting? Why is it virtue signalling to teach about it?

Plenty of harm was caused by it and it's a very interesting insight into the Thatcherite era. Why do you think it's unworthy of study?

Wadsworthy · 10/07/2026 03:02

Hardly a harsh punishment for a very rude & disrespectful gesture particularly in the context of a lesson on Clause 28. But if you're OK with your DS thinking a rude gesture is OK to make in his class room, go ahead and be "that" parent.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread