Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The tack room

Discuss horse riding and ownership on our Horse forum.

Are you boycotting Lush?

218 replies

MookySpinge · 15/10/2009 13:37

I am, but wondered what the rest of you think of their decision to support Hunt Sabs - feel it is on a par with any other terrorist group personally. Should probably do a link but iPhone is behaving badly at the moment.

OP posts:
MookySpinge · 15/10/2009 17:41

Am I the only one who thinks of hunt sabs as being aggressive to animals, injuring horses and hounds?

OP posts:
pofacedandproud · 15/10/2009 17:58

I don't think they want to deliberately harm horses or hounds. And to be fair hunters have committed quite a bit of violence towards hunt sabs.

TheHeadlessWombat · 15/10/2009 22:33

I am and I love their products. DP's father is a MFH and they've had a lot of trouble e.g threats,assaults,vandalism from hunt sabs over the years.

skihorse · 16/10/2009 09:39

I had no idea Lush were doing this mooky - I detest hunt sabs, have had too many friend's horses, not to mention hounds, lamed by these monkeys.

As for Lush themselves, I'm more worried about the absolute bollock load of chemicals they put in their products... although I'm prepared to be placed against the wall for my love of "Rock Star".

wombatt Quite, and walkers (these are the people, volunteers, who raise the hounds from pups to adulthood) threatened.

pofacedandproud · 16/10/2009 09:55

leetle bit hypocritical to complain of animals being injured when the entire point of the hunt is to impose huge stress and fear onto an animal ending with its death [until recently a death which involved being torn apart by dogs and may still happen 'by mistake' ]

skihorse · 16/10/2009 10:01

Whatever your thoughts on hunting might be...

Hunters don't come in to your house and injure your pet.

I always thought people who didn't like hunting just had a chip on their shoulder and have just never experienced the joys of galloping through the countryside.

pofacedandproud · 16/10/2009 10:10

I am a rider skihorse I love galloping through the countryside. I don't chasing foxes and watching dogs tear them apart. Funny that.

pofacedandproud · 16/10/2009 10:11

I don't love chasing foxes and watching dogs tear them apart.

ProfessorLaytonIsMyLoveSlave · 16/10/2009 10:20

Hunters do, on occasion, come into your garden and injure your pet, though.

cazboldy · 16/10/2009 21:56

Completely agree MookySpinge, and yes I will be boycotting them.....

Sorry Pofaced, but methinks you are a little naive, about the lengths some of these horrible sabs will go to......

kormaAAAARRRRGGHHchameleon · 16/10/2009 22:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Butkin · 17/10/2009 20:07

I would boycott except I've never been in there anyway and certainly don't intend to now!

Strange PR stance - backing animal extremists who get very bad press. I don't like the RSPCA but you could understand it if Lush backed them instead.

Macdog · 17/10/2009 20:39

Hi MookySpinge, saw you on my thread in the News section.

I used to buy Lush, but will not be any more.

Wonder what Lush will do if they directly fund another Trevor Morse type incident

JodieO · 17/10/2009 20:52

Hang on, if you don't like hunting you have a chip on your shoulder? Why would you have to hunt to experience galloping through the countryside? Please answer that question.

Good on Lush imo, hunting is disgusting and vile and cruel, again imo. I rode for many years but would rather cut off my own arm than see a poor defenseless animal ripped to shreds for "fun". What fun that must be eh. I've always thought people that hunted must be vile and heartless human beings, truely disgusts me.

GoppingOtter · 17/10/2009 20:54

mooky spinge i find this thread offensive
you boycott lush all you like

GoppingOtter · 17/10/2009 20:55

hunt saboteurs are not extremists they are liberators

GreenMonkies · 17/10/2009 21:00

It's funny, now that the law has changed on Hunting with Dogs there are more foxes being killed than before. This is because Hunters now have to flush the fox(es) with the hounds, then shoot them. Obviously the hounds do still catch the odd fox, but as a rule most foxes are shot now.

And to just counter the whole "ripped to pieces by dogs" shite line, when a pack of hounds catches a fox, the lead hound (the one at the front) will kill the fox pretty much instantly, and then the pack will have a go, but if any foxes are ripped to bits, they are dead by the time this happens. Anyone who sobs out this emotive line has obviously never seen a fox killed by hounds and as a result doesn't know what they are talking about.

And if you are concerned about the stress caused to foxes when they are being chased by hounds, you'd all best stop walking (especially with a dog) in local woodlands and parks, because any fox, be it rural or urban, will run from a sound the approach of any person, with or without a dog and feel the same level of instinctive fear as they do when they are running from hounds.

And those of you with your cute fluffy kitty-cats, are you aware of what they do to birds and mice? Cats are very cruel, they play with live creatures, injuring them more and more until they die of shock. Compared to this fox-hunting is humane.

And finally, shooting is not as precise as hunting with hounds. It's very easy to wing a fox, but not kill it outright, and trust me, gangrene is a long, drawn out, horrific way to go, but a bite to the throat or back of the neck is quick, clean and over.

Hunt sabs are scum, and even though I don't shop in Lush because it smells fecking awful, I certainly won't go in there now.

GreenMonkies · 17/10/2009 21:02

And yes, I boycott Nestle.

GoppingOtter · 17/10/2009 21:04

nice

ravenAK · 17/10/2009 21:08

I shall be making a point of doing my Xmas shopping at Lush.

& whilst obviously the poor bloke didn't deserve to have his head ripped off by a gyrocopter, there is a degree of irony in that he was presumably promoting his passion for illegally ripping foxes to bits at the time...

Doobydoo · 17/10/2009 21:10

Hunt sabs aren't scum.Tad extreme to assume they all are.I know many and was one in my youth.
Lush can do what they like,people don't have to shop there.

GoppingOtter · 17/10/2009 21:11

ravenAK

lush??? no never shopped there. What an excellent place to spend the £100 i just won in premium bonds

what do you all fancy?

Dawnybabe · 17/10/2009 21:12

I would just like to add that hunts very rarely ever catch a fox nowadays. This is probably because shoot managers and gamekeepers have to now go out at night and shoot the whole family of foxes in one go, because thanks to the hunting ban we can't rely on the hunt to be able to keep the vermin under control.

GoppingOtter · 17/10/2009 21:13

that's a relief

shooting far preferable to the ripping apart malarkey

Doobydoo · 17/10/2009 21:14

OOOH I like the KARMA range...Thankeee kindly