Bea:
*it's not the same risk level for everyone is it though?
Some of us are older.
Some of us are obese.
Some of us are BAME.
Some of us are male.
Some of us have underlying health conditions.
Some are more than one of these.
And to take your driving analogy - when I drive I put a seatbelt on, check my car is roadworthy, follow the speed limit etc. I minimise the risk. This is like having 5 beers, piling into a car without an MOT with 8 kids in a car designed for 4, not putting seatbelts on and driving at 80mph down the highstreet.
If we were doing similar to Denmark we'd be less worried but they have far less cases smaller class sizes and have spread out over a much wider area.*
No that is an average risk for healthy women of working age. If you're shielding you shouldn't be expected to go in. For the sake of comparison, men who are doing the most "at risk" jobs still only have a 25 per 100,000 chance of death. Still very low. The figures might move around slightly but they're all still very low.
Your car analogy is completely incorrect. Without wearing a seatbelt and with drinking the risk of death would be much higher than 1 in 20,000, obviously. What I am saying is the risk of dying for a fit and healthy woman is the same as the risk of dying in a road traffic accident in the UK
Your risk is obviously higher when you're interacting with children than it is when you're sitting at home completely isolated, just like your risk of dying from driving a car is higher than when you're sat at home isolated.