Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Ham pr disasters 57! ….continuing the confusion and controversy….

1000 replies

jeffgoldblum · Yesterday 19:46

Once more into the breach dear friends!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
Lunde · Today 20:06

andyburnhamhere · Today 19:47

The grubbiest of grubby spectacles I think I have ever witnessed is Dan Wootton interviewing Lady “Colin” Campbell today. It is quite literally beyond belief, and I would certainly not want to find myself on the side she is so enthusiastically punting. Utterly disgusting. The remarkable thing is watching his usual fawning entourage rally underneath it, apparently oblivious to just how sordid the whole affair looks. I won’t link to it because, frankly, it’s just filth. And now that I’ve flagged it, only the truly culturally debased would be tempted to seek it out.

I'm sure they are very happy that you are giving them clicks!

ABitFab · Today 20:07

Australia 🇦🇺 definitely does not want them.

MeghanAndTheSeals · Today 20:08

andyburnhamhere · Today 19:47

The grubbiest of grubby spectacles I think I have ever witnessed is Dan Wootton interviewing Lady “Colin” Campbell today. It is quite literally beyond belief, and I would certainly not want to find myself on the side she is so enthusiastically punting. Utterly disgusting. The remarkable thing is watching his usual fawning entourage rally underneath it, apparently oblivious to just how sordid the whole affair looks. I won’t link to it because, frankly, it’s just filth. And now that I’ve flagged it, only the truly culturally debased would be tempted to seek it out.

I don’t have, and never have had, any desire to watch/read what that woman says. Quite capable of forming my own opinions based purely on what HaM say and do. Why on earth did you decide to watch it? If ever there’s a case of quoting “haven’t you got better things to do with your life”, then this is one of them!

Rhaidimiddim · Today 20:08

Kingsandqueenz · Today 19:56

Why did you watch it then if it repelled you so much 😂

So that she can speak with authority to put down anyone else on here who cites it.

I'm now wondering what info it contains that the Sussexes want suppressing.

AutumnCrowning · Today 20:11

StartupRepair · Today 19:55

No we don't want them hanging out in Melbourne.

More thoughts and prayers to you, to @CrocsNotDocs, and to your families. I’m so very sorry you have this hideous televisual spectre hanging over you 🌺 🙏

On the positive side, Brontay Coy does talk a load of old shite a lot of the time, so it could be bollocks.

AtIusvue · Today 20:13

CrocsNotDocs · Today 19:23

Optics on this aren’t great!!!

MeghanAndTheSeals · Today 20:14

AutumnCrowning · Today 20:11

More thoughts and prayers to you, to @CrocsNotDocs, and to your families. I’m so very sorry you have this hideous televisual spectre hanging over you 🌺 🙏

On the positive side, Brontay Coy does talk a load of old shite a lot of the time, so it could be bollocks.

If it is true, it’s just another example of dragging the kids from pillar to post. I’d guess that, right now, they just need stability and continuity. Not being shunted around to allow HaM to grab whatever media opportunities they currently want.

But hey, I’m not a parent, so what the hell do I know?

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:16

MeghanAndTheSeals · Today 20:08

I don’t have, and never have had, any desire to watch/read what that woman says. Quite capable of forming my own opinions based purely on what HaM say and do. Why on earth did you decide to watch it? If ever there’s a case of quoting “haven’t you got better things to do with your life”, then this is one of them!

It popped up in my X feed, so in the interests of all sides-ism, I thought I’d watch it. Apparently, this woman raised $56,000 for Thomas Markle and spent years shielding him within the anti-Meghan universe.

Haters need to understand that, on the fringes of this particular ecosystem, there are some deeply disturbed individuals who spend an extraordinary amount of time online churning out and amplifying this stuff. The Reddit community r/SaintMeghanMarkle has 128,000 members whose apparent raison d’être is to obsess over and promote hatred of Meghan.

I’m not suggesting that everyone who criticises Meghan, certainly here is anything like that, or that all critics should be tarred with the same brush. But perhaps it’s worth pausing to consider the company you’re keeping. When you’re swimming in murky waters, you may find yourself sharing them with some truly appalling bedfellows.

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:17

Rhaidimiddim · Today 20:08

So that she can speak with authority to put down anyone else on here who cites it.

I'm now wondering what info it contains that the Sussexes want suppressing.

Be my guest but have a sick bag ready ,Alice ! I did a Streisand on it deliberately.

Mylovelygreendress · Today 20:17

Haters .
Next we’ll have frothing .,

Passingthroughagain · Today 20:19

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:16

It popped up in my X feed, so in the interests of all sides-ism, I thought I’d watch it. Apparently, this woman raised $56,000 for Thomas Markle and spent years shielding him within the anti-Meghan universe.

Haters need to understand that, on the fringes of this particular ecosystem, there are some deeply disturbed individuals who spend an extraordinary amount of time online churning out and amplifying this stuff. The Reddit community r/SaintMeghanMarkle has 128,000 members whose apparent raison d’être is to obsess over and promote hatred of Meghan.

I’m not suggesting that everyone who criticises Meghan, certainly here is anything like that, or that all critics should be tarred with the same brush. But perhaps it’s worth pausing to consider the company you’re keeping. When you’re swimming in murky waters, you may find yourself sharing them with some truly appalling bedfellows.

Oh do bore off. Your lecturing is becoming really tedious.

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:20

Passingthroughagain · Today 20:19

Oh do bore off. Your lecturing is becoming really tedious.

Edited

You go low , I go high. No sorry about that.

AutumnCrowning · Today 20:20

Mylovelygreendress · Today 20:17

Haters .
Next we’ll have frothing .,

It’s all very Yada Yada Pigeon

Pigeon Dove GIF
AutumnCrowning · Today 20:21

Can we move on please?

Passingthroughagain · Today 20:22

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:20

You go low , I go high. No sorry about that.

Why are you on this thread though? You clearly don’t agree or approve of anyone else’s opinion on this story, so just give up.

IceBrownie · Today 20:23

The quote in the image comes from Prince Harry in the Netflix documentary series Harry & Meghan, released in December 2022.
The line appears during the discussion about the breakdown of Meghan Markle's relationship with her father, Thomas Markle, before the couple's 2018 wedding. Harry says:
“She had a father, now she doesn’t have a father. I shouldered that because if Meg was not with me, then her dad would still be her dad.”

From the horse's mouth. How would he say this if MM's timeline is true?

Ham pr disasters 57! ….continuing the confusion and controversy….
andyburnhamhere · Today 20:25

AutumnCrowning · Today 20:21

Can we move on please?

Yes, please. As a matter of note, I don’t abuse anyone, and I try to keep the discussion grounded in facts, even when expressing strong opinions. I’m perfectly happy to be robust in my criticism, but I draw the line at personal abuse and unfounded claims. If you want to tell me to please bore off, or the door is that way, mate! I don’t mind a bit of playful pushback. I’ll be gone soon enough anyway, as I’m planning to nuke my account for the sake of my own sanity.Give me a couple more days of fun before I do though.

AlexandraCarrington · Today 20:25

Can we move on please?

How about a derail?
I bought a multipack of Cadbury's Heroes today to give to my mum when I see her later this week. They're calling to me....
What should I do?

WilIiamsExtraSausage · Today 20:26

Stop arguing, children!

Angry Sasha Banks GIF by WWE
bluegreygreen · Today 20:27

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:20

You go low , I go high. No sorry about that.

But perhaps it’s worth pausing to consider the company you’re keeping.

Says the person watching Lady C videos ...

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:28

AlexandraCarrington · Today 20:25

Can we move on please?

How about a derail?
I bought a multipack of Cadbury's Heroes today to give to my mum when I see her later this week. They're calling to me....
What should I do?

I’ve had seven heroes today out of a hidden tin I bought for £3.95 from somewhere I’ve forgotten. They’re vile, though and I've hidden the wrappers to pretend I'm not doing it , so you might as well dump them straight in the bin.

bluegreygreen · Today 20:28

AutumnCrowning · Today 20:21

Can we move on please?

Sorry - will do.

nicegreenwillow · Today 20:29

andyburnhamhere · Today 20:16

It popped up in my X feed, so in the interests of all sides-ism, I thought I’d watch it. Apparently, this woman raised $56,000 for Thomas Markle and spent years shielding him within the anti-Meghan universe.

Haters need to understand that, on the fringes of this particular ecosystem, there are some deeply disturbed individuals who spend an extraordinary amount of time online churning out and amplifying this stuff. The Reddit community r/SaintMeghanMarkle has 128,000 members whose apparent raison d’être is to obsess over and promote hatred of Meghan.

I’m not suggesting that everyone who criticises Meghan, certainly here is anything like that, or that all critics should be tarred with the same brush. But perhaps it’s worth pausing to consider the company you’re keeping. When you’re swimming in murky waters, you may find yourself sharing them with some truly appalling bedfellows.

What if you are a person who constantly supports and excuses those who are deceitful and greedy; who use royal titles for personal gain and betrayal of the very institution which gave them everything they have? Who see being royal as being rich and having more than others? Supporting being a celebrity just because that's all that's important to them?
Imagine supporting Harry and Meghan?.
You're certainly swimming in murky waters.

nicegreenwillow · Today 20:30

IceBrownie · Today 20:23

The quote in the image comes from Prince Harry in the Netflix documentary series Harry & Meghan, released in December 2022.
The line appears during the discussion about the breakdown of Meghan Markle's relationship with her father, Thomas Markle, before the couple's 2018 wedding. Harry says:
“She had a father, now she doesn’t have a father. I shouldered that because if Meg was not with me, then her dad would still be her dad.”

From the horse's mouth. How would he say this if MM's timeline is true?

So much dishonesty. So much hypocrisy.
Imagine supporting the Sussexes.

HoldMyWine · Today 20:32

From x.
Meg is reportedly very upset. I’m sure she is but she’s known about this for 8 years. Hardly a shock.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.