H and m pr disasters 34!

[jeffgoldblum]

A continuation of the exiting and entertaining shenanigans of ham….

Do I need to source the cheese platter?

It’ll be something like “I can’t help that I was born this way. I didn’t ask for this.”

He's not a Prince of England . . . .

He's A VERY NAUGHTY BOY . . . .

My DH has no interest in the RF but wondered why I was getting excited so I told him to read the statement and his response was “ final warning or the titles go” .
He may have a point ( not that I will tell him!)

What did he brief about Remembrance Sunday? Was it to tell us all whose rack he will be ogling this year?

Charcuterie board, surely?!

If he dares to try and snap back at the king then he knows that the very narrow possibility of being welcomed back into the family is gone forever and he may as well pack up his wife and kids and go back to California.

The only reason he came back to the UK was to try and establish himself back into the fold and get his feet under the table before William ascends the throne and starts issuing letters patent removing titles.

Yes my thoughts too Mrsleon .

I think George's year - the new boys - start on Tuesday 8 September (tomorrow), with an induction day. So, William should be able to drop George off at his new school.

Yes, I really think NYC should build a proper cricket stadium. They had a temporary one in Nassau County but took it down.

I love this and I totally agree @Mylovelygreendress This reads like a terse final warning.

That's my thought too but we most likely have worked with colleagues like this. Constant warnings, then employment terminated

They snapped back at the Queen didn’t they?

Wonder if something about the Sussex kids starting school will be accidentally on purpose released on Wednesday too.

Then..."but you never warned me"

William will be in Norway for the royal funeral, if I am not mistaken.

Agreed...this is an absolute smack down from the palace who are no doubt horrified by the nonsense that the Sussex pair have been leaking.

The really interesting line for me is "recourse to public funds". What is going on that requires BP to essentially say don't spend any public money on H&M without checking with us first?

I think he has made a very good point.

It’s a very clear message. There is no softening of the message with wishing them well and it’s clear that trey only represent themselves.

I think the abeyance point is interesting as it makes me think it’s a ‘use it and you’ll lose it’ warning shot.

Do we think that strong feminist icon Meghan Markle threw herself on the ground sobbing inconsolably at the reading of the letter?

Oh excellent!!! 👌, how could you think you would not be one of us and quote Monty python!

It shows how delusional the "sources" who kept diminishing William and Catherine were

Agree, @MrsLeonFarrell.

I have argued here and elsewhere that there was no evidence of any separation between KC3 and William, and that all talk of division was merely spin. I think this confirms it.

That letter is as perfectly worded as ‘recollections may vary’.

If H&M try to spin it as ‘we are clearly a threat’? More fool them.

They've been told. And that includes told to be winding their necks in.

KC has spoken.

Or "stop sending invoices to BP, they're self funding"