PR disasters thread 25

[BigWillyLittleTodger]

The Montecito diaries continue……..will it be Balmoral or bust?

It does have a pool. The previous Earl Spencer had one installed for his children when they moved there.

None of her face. Just of her arse and her jewellery.

I wonder if they're now looking for a house in Scotland?

Possibly the current Earl had it modified? He does have 7 kids.

You need 8 officers for a team to provide a 24/7 security officer.

He never seems to see them though!

You have no idea how often he sees the three younger children. Unlike the Sussexes, those children's lives are private.

Ah that's where she got the idea for the photo ! Bingo !

Who knows. I care enough to post on these threads, but not enough to try to work out AI stuff etc. I mean why would a person want to imply something like that when it’s entirely plausible that they were actually there given she’s married to the deceased’s son, and the media had been trailing the visit for weeks?

So many times these two have said/posted/done things that they think to be really clever by not being outright falsehoods, but which deliberately sail close enough to get their point across but also allow them to cry “we didn’t actually say that!” when they’re called out on the point they’re making. They’re like A Level Law students thinking they’ve found a gotcha. We didn’t call them racist when you actually look back at the tape, we got “married” three days beforehand, they took my passport and keys”, the “we have to be seen as not having had anything to do with him” re Omid Scobie, the “tugging on the heartstrings” letter to Thomas Markle, posting photos of the back of their kids’ heads while preaching about the evils of social media’s invasion of children’s privacy - and all the rest. They must have a plaque in their kitchen emblazoned with “Plausible Deniability”. This photos falls right into that category: the only people who would know what those lavender sprigs on a black stone are, are people who she knows wouldn’t call her out for it. But she won’t post enough to show exactly what it is, just enough to make people guess and to be able to say “who me? What do you take me for? I would never! You’re so mean to me, you’re bullying me again. Just because i took a random photo of lavender which I just happened to think was a pretty thing by the side of the road! Go on, prove me wrong!”.

That's true. He doesn't seem to have a very good relationship with any of his ex wives and never mentions his kids on social media or otherwise. It's good their lives are kept private.

That's very true !

Not a fan of farage but seeing as Ann widdicome was with reform and that he has had death threats it seems reasonable.

Please stop! This is descending into 2022.

In other news, Althorp House definitely has a private swimming pool.

Could have been worse , it could have been flower sprinkles.

What happened then?

Then there are these!

It's too early for Heather in Scotland .

Very true!

Yes indeed. Also it looks possible that the recently planted hedge in the background of the Diana photo is the mature, neatly clipped hedge in the current photos. Similar width of lawn too.

Yep. I do tend to think as itsimagain as a bloke. It’s something to do with his username. Am I trying to drag it out? No. Not at all. No, not at all. But I can understand why you wouldn’t like it being pointed out that until you admonished a poster it was very likely the spat would never have garnered any attention in order for the thread not to go off piste.

Good spot!

@HoldMyWine! Let it be shown I’m holding firm to my word to you! 😁

You're right

However what is interesting is that Google maps shows a pool with a paved surround whereas the pictures HAM posted show a pool with a narrow stone "kerb" surrounded by grass which is how it looked in Diana's day. I wonder if it was in black and white to cover it being an AI creation or a composite of several photos.

Given how many men post at MN I’m don’t think we can be sure of anything when it comes to a persons gender.