Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR Disasters thread 20

647 replies

OctopusFriend · 02/07/2026 20:13

More to chat about

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Mylovelygreendress · Today 08:15

Lunde · Today 00:21

Interesting from Neil Sean (allegedly) today

The Sussexes had some very specific demands for coming to the UK
-the only royal residence they were prepared to accept was Windsor (presumably for adjacency to the K&Q and PPOW - vetoed)
-H&M also demanded full use of the royal helicopters for their transport

Invictus are also apparently demanding Harry turns up to drum up some sponsors for the struggling IG27

Meghan may or may not go to Althorp for the Diana connection

All of the drama is creating a lot of stress for Charles....

I did read the Windsor demand from another commentator too so am inclined to believe there might be some truth in that especially as H and M wanted to live in Windsor Castle post wedding .

HoldMyWine · Today 08:21

Mylovelygreendress · Yesterday 18:52

What would happen if they were found to be armed ?

They would be committing criminal offences in the UK

Recklessismymiddlename · Today 08:24

Lunde · Today 00:21

Interesting from Neil Sean (allegedly) today

The Sussexes had some very specific demands for coming to the UK
-the only royal residence they were prepared to accept was Windsor (presumably for adjacency to the K&Q and PPOW - vetoed)
-H&M also demanded full use of the royal helicopters for their transport

Invictus are also apparently demanding Harry turns up to drum up some sponsors for the struggling IG27

Meghan may or may not go to Althorp for the Diana connection

All of the drama is creating a lot of stress for Charles....

But how would he know? Genuine question. I’d love to know how these people know anything tbh.

Mind you we now know, that Harry, has been feeding certain journalists, information last week, as they are now fuming it was a load of lies. Funnily enough exactly what he blamed the royal family for. Couldn’t make it up eh, Harry?!

OctopusFriend · Today 08:25

Recklessismymiddlename · Today 08:24

But how would he know? Genuine question. I’d love to know how these people know anything tbh.

Mind you we now know, that Harry, has been feeding certain journalists, information last week, as they are now fuming it was a load of lies. Funnily enough exactly what he blamed the royal family for. Couldn’t make it up eh, Harry?!

There's your answer. We know that Harry can't keep quiet and he leaks to tabloids all the time. That's the source.

OP posts:
Mylovelygreendress · Today 08:26

Recklessismymiddlename · Today 08:24

But how would he know? Genuine question. I’d love to know how these people know anything tbh.

Mind you we now know, that Harry, has been feeding certain journalists, information last week, as they are now fuming it was a load of lies. Funnily enough exactly what he blamed the royal family for. Couldn’t make it up eh, Harry?!

Well exactly , it’s clear that Harry and/ or Meghan have been planting stories for years . It’s the written equivalent of Meghan tipping off the paps when she is going for a “ hike” on Coronation Day.

Recklessismymiddlename · Today 08:27

Obviously
gosh I’m thick without my first coffee of the day 🙈

IcedPurple · Today 08:40

Recklessismymiddlename · Today 08:24

But how would he know? Genuine question. I’d love to know how these people know anything tbh.

Mind you we now know, that Harry, has been feeding certain journalists, information last week, as they are now fuming it was a load of lies. Funnily enough exactly what he blamed the royal family for. Couldn’t make it up eh, Harry?!

But how would he know?

He wouldn't. He's an engagement farming hack. And it works.

There are some 'journalists' who do get genuine 'leaks' from the Sussexes. But Neil Sean is not one of them. I doubt he knows much more than you or I. So much stuff out there on social media is simply made up.

OctopusFriend · Today 08:52

Mylovelygreendress · Today 08:26

Well exactly , it’s clear that Harry and/ or Meghan have been planting stories for years . It’s the written equivalent of Meghan tipping off the paps when she is going for a “ hike” on Coronation Day.

So predictable!

OP posts:
Thedom · Today 09:07

I also wonder if Invictus are finally ‘reading the room’ somewhat and asking Harry to do the Invictus stuff alone without Meghan ?

The optics and criticism of Invictus supporting the Harry & Meghan show, and now Invictus being hit with the accusation by Harry that Invictus events are a target for a terrorist attack because of Harry’s presence, they must be scrambling to try to claw back some / any credibility and reputational damage.

KilkennyCats · Today 09:19

IG need to offload the pair of them.

DryTerryandJUNE · Today 09:53

If security was my number 1 priority, no WAY would I be demanding helicopters.

ShamedBySiri · Today 10:18

I can well believe they wanted Windsor, for a variety of reasons, most of which would be exactly why they wouldn't be given Windsor. I would expect William to veto that in no uncertain terms. I recall when they were here, staying at Frogmore Cottage during the period leading up to The Queen's funeral, there was a photo of William stopping to talk to Harry as their cars passed going in/out of the park. The last thing William would want would be to bump into either of those two, or for his family to have to get out of the way while Harry's motorcade barrels down the road.
A dusty apartment at the back of Buckingham palace it is. And don't forget to sew name tags into your underwear if you want laundry doing while you are here! 🤗😂😂😂

As for the will they/won't they visit Diana's grave, whilst it would be unkind of Earl Spencer not to allow Harry to visit her grave, I don't see why he should be expected to have the entourage to stay, and entertain them for a weekend or even lunch. If he were agreeable to offer to host them I would think he would

  1. want to know his invitation has been accepted and 2. demand total secrecy.

The whole they might or they might not must be mightily pissing him off and I think probably means they won't. He is one person who I think could get on the blower and give Harry an icy blast of home truths. And withdraw any invitation that exists. Plus of course he won't allow any photography. He should put an extra padlock on those gates and tell him to stay away because...security. (In this instance highly relevant).

OctopusFriend · Today 10:20

"Total secrecy"
That's the very opposite of how the Sussexes operate.

OP posts:
ShamedBySiri · Today 10:30

OctopusFriend · Today 10:20

"Total secrecy"
That's the very opposite of how the Sussexes operate.

True but in that case the Earl would be entirely within his rights to say No Visit then. Why should his privacy and security be compromised? I wouldn’t allow Meghan access to the grave either. She never knew Diana. She isn’t family. I just wouldn’t allow it.

Sophiecunninghamsfinger · Today 10:31

Wanting Windsor - what do they think this is ? Disneyland? 😂😂😂

Sophiecunninghamsfinger · Today 10:34

ComePlayMyTrombolise · Today 06:29

She won’t want official pictures of KC with the children because they would have to show their faces (I can’t imagine KC agreeing to a shot with him and the backs of their heads).

Therefore she will no longer be able to monetise the first full face shots with Hello! or The Beano or whatever magazine will pay the most. An ‘at home with the HaMs and HaMlets spread would generate a big one-off payment.

Clap Applause GIF

The Hamlets ! 😂😂

bluegreygreen · Today 10:37

RhannionKPSS · Today 01:00

Harry was a soldier who served this country, he and his family could well be targeted in the UK. Charlie should pay for his son’s security, he has plenty of money , then it would not come from the public purse.

I know H & M can be insufferable, Harry really should have picked a far more sensible and honest partner, preferably a woman who would have happily lived in Africa, not the demanding one he choose. It’s a real shame George, Charlotte and Louis don’t know their cousins

Harry has a bespoke arrangement whereby, with 28 days' notice (to allow for assessment time and employment law requirements) he has an up-to-date security assessment and the security provided that he is considered to require based on that assessment.

It is insulting to the professionals involved, who are the most skilled in their specialism and have access to the most recent intelligence, to suggest that they would not do a thorough job.

The King cannot intervene in matters of security. It is also well established that police security cannot be bought. If it could, there would be plenty of billionaires in London who would attempt it.

My only comment on Harry's service is that he is currently doing a dis-service to the veterans associated with Invictus, who are lost in his temper tantrums.

Passingthrough123 · Today 10:37

I think Neil Sean is spot on about Windsor, and he will have been fed it by Palace sources who are exasperated on the King’s behalf that this has become such a shit-show and that Harry’s entitlement is the sticking point.

Butteredtoast55 · Today 10:41

How do they think Windsor is more secure than BP or any of the KP choices? It's all about adjacency and the opportunity to be seen with other members of the RF, isn't it? To be seen as being back in the fold.
I wouldn't put it past them to just rock up at the Wales' door as if nothing has happened. I think M is brazen enough and H is thick and entitled enough.

OctopusFriend · Today 10:44

They don't, @Butteredtoast55, because it's not about security. It's status.

OP posts:
noonames · Today 11:03

Butteredtoast55 · Today 10:41

How do they think Windsor is more secure than BP or any of the KP choices? It's all about adjacency and the opportunity to be seen with other members of the RF, isn't it? To be seen as being back in the fold.
I wouldn't put it past them to just rock up at the Wales' door as if nothing has happened. I think M is brazen enough and H is thick and entitled enough.

Haha yes - Buckingham Palace is too famous and recognisable, we’ll have Windsor Castle instead - so nondescript and discreet, nobody even knows it’s there 🤦‍♀️

notimagain · Today 11:13

DryTerryandJUNE · Today 09:53

If security was my number 1 priority, no WAY would I be demanding helicopters.

Edited

Depends in the perceived threat, which we don't know.

There are certainly good reasons for using them from a security POV in certain circumstances, but probably hard to use security to justify using one to e.g. London>Brum and return

Passingthrough123 · Today 11:15

Butteredtoast55 · Today 10:41

How do they think Windsor is more secure than BP or any of the KP choices? It's all about adjacency and the opportunity to be seen with other members of the RF, isn't it? To be seen as being back in the fold.
I wouldn't put it past them to just rock up at the Wales' door as if nothing has happened. I think M is brazen enough and H is thick and entitled enough.

It's definitely about adjacency. They will want to spin the narrative that Project Thaw is happening, and that their paths might have crossed with William and Kate given the proximity and that all was dandy. Where do you think the stories in the US came from this week that Kate was apparently pushing William to make peace with Harry and was desperate for her kids to meet their cousins? Utter bollocks from the Sussex camp again.

shockthemonkey · Today 11:16

No way!!! Where are you reading those stories, @Passingthrough123 ?

Passingthrough123 · Today 11:19

Thedom · Today 09:07

I also wonder if Invictus are finally ‘reading the room’ somewhat and asking Harry to do the Invictus stuff alone without Meghan ?

The optics and criticism of Invictus supporting the Harry & Meghan show, and now Invictus being hit with the accusation by Harry that Invictus events are a target for a terrorist attack because of Harry’s presence, they must be scrambling to try to claw back some / any credibility and reputational damage.

Can you imagine the trauma some of the veterans might be suffering on reading the headlines that the event could be a terrorist target? The idea they could end up in another bomb blast? It's so irresponsible of Harry to leak that possibility for the sake of positive press when these veterans have already experienced so many horrors.

Swipe left for the next trending thread