Oh come on, do do you really expect there to be evidence readily available to the public about this saying Camilla potentially or allegedly engineered this story or that?
Palace PR is well resourced and we know from Lownie how it flexes its power with the use of NDAs and not so subtle threats and employing journalistic poachers as PR gamekeepers!
But more importantly we know from the contacts themselves - not Camilla - that there are strong lines of communication nonetheless.
Mark Bolland openly stated in a recent article that he was still in touch with Camilla.
Bolland was allegedly paid £150,000 by Charles to rehabilitate the image of Camilla after Diana’s death, and who was and is married to the head of the Press Complaints Commission at the time, Guy Black, and was, and allegedly still is, a friend of Rebekah Wade now Brooks, who was CEO of Murdoch’s News International from 2009–2011 who then resigned because of the Milly Dowler phone hacking scandal, one of many other phone hacking incidents, and was tried and acquitted for the same in 2014 and for perverting the course of justice.
If you read up about it all, you can begin to understand why Harry was and still is complaining about it many years later. He may be confused and a little paranoid about some of the stories written about him but he’s not wrong to feel that powerful alliances were playing chess in the background of his life.
At the time there was allegedly a great deal of concern about the so-called Bolland-Wade-Black axis. Ross Kemp, Wade’s first husband, was allegedly childhood friends with Black and they all allegedly holidayed together. Kemp, before his divorce from Rebekah Wade as she was then, was an ambassador for Camilla’s royal osteoporosis society.
There are lots of photos of Camilla & Charles greeting Rebekah Wade and Ross Kemp at various events if you Google.
The most important thing to remember is that many of the media executives who were in charge at the time of the phone hacking scandal are still in charge now! Rebekah Brooks for example returned as CEO of News UK in 2015 and has been in that position every since.
Guy Black was, until 2018, Executive Director, of the Telegraph Media Group.
And Bolland launched a glittering career off the back of his extremely successful PR campaign for Charles & Camilla and is now a highly influential, well connected, establishment figure, a vice-president of UNICEF among other appointments, and is currently leading the UK government's drive to tackle the youth unemployment and inactivity crisis, having been a former CEO at M&S and Morrisons.
It’s said that Bolland and Camilla are still great friends and Bolland said in a press interview recently that he meets her for lunch several times a year and apparently he has a signed photograph of them both prominently displayed in his home in the Cotswolds.
This alone imho should make us all question seriously what we read in the press about KC and C and Harry!
And who were the two friends prominently supporting Rebekah Brooks’s after her acquittal from the phone hacking trials?
Morgan and Clarkson!
And who among others were at the famous press lunch attended by Camilla after which that nasty piece appeared written by Clarkson about Meghan being paraded through the streets with a shaved head and having dung thrown at her head, for which he had to apologise publicly?
Clarkson and Camilla were friends as teenagers and he reported that they shared cigarette and chats.
Clarkson and Brooks have been photographed chatting together and smoking behind the tents at Cornbury.
They were and still are part of the now infamous Chipping Norton set. (Remember the difficulty over BSkyB, Vince Cable and the Christmas dinner attended by Cameron the PM? Cameron was once part of the group once but it’s written that he didn’t remain loyal to RB during her trial.)
Morgan originally employed Rebekah Brooks at News of the World and they know one another of old!
We all know that Piers Morgan went off on many wierd vitriolic rants about Meghan that got him sacked from the BBC when challenged about it.
The sycophant but clever Gyles Brandreth wrote a very flattering biography of Charles and Camilla’s relationship titled “Portrait of a Love Affair” and is involved with Camilla’s literary work and there he is, oh what a surprise, popping up on morning tv calling Diana “mad” during a conversation that was completely out of context! His recent commentary at Trooping of the Colour btw was so brown-nosingly deferential and complimentary to Charles and Camilla that even strong royalists of my acquaintance turned off their tv!
Patrick Jephson, Diana’s former press secretary., publically questioned the ethics of Charles and his coterie who seemed to rehabilitate Camilla by spreading a narrative that Diana was mentally ill.
And in a more recent documentary Jephson has stated: "I think Camilla, far from being the simple country woman that we were sold is actually a very shrewd politically media savvy person.
"We are told that the campaign to rehabilitate Camilla has been subtle. I don't think it's been subtle at all. It's got all the subtlety of a sledgehammer."
"I think Charles' office was pretty cold-blooded in the way they used Harry," he continued, "misrepresenting facts to portray his father and his mistress in a better light.”
This elite connected group of people all know which side their bread is buttered! This is how elite circles maintain their power and privilege. Try and protest or question too closely and you get completely destroyed in the press eg Harry. Chris Bryant MP, Ed Milliband MP. Their stories of what really happened behind the headlines can be researched if you are interested.
And lastly here’s an article quoting Charlie Brooks, race horse trainer, husband of Rebekah, praising Charles’s love of the sport!
Charlie Brooks is pictured with Camilla!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/racing/2025/06/09/queen-camilla-royal-ascot-king-government-betting-tax/
So yes the connections are there if you care to look! This is all supposition by me but at the same time everything I have mentioned can be easily researched with a mobile phone and Google. It’s up to you what conclusions you draw.