I agree about Meghan's dress: Could have been lovely but missed the mark. For me, it was because the fit was so bad. She had extra material around the torso but it was a shade tight on the hips. It needed to have much better tailoring on the top half and and be a little more forgiving on the bottom half. It should have had the most gorgeous shape like Pippa Middleton's bridesmaid dress, and it just didn't. How you can have a six-figure custom dress by Givenchy that's a bad fit, I'll never know, but it seems you can. I also wonder if it was just too plain. It looked severe, somehow. And the material looked stiff and thick. Maybe that's why it didn't skim her figure nicely like Pippa's bridesmaid dress.
Kate's was by far the best. A total dream.
Harriet's was severe and frumpy with the super-high neckline teamed with very long sleeves. The skirt was too straight. The neckline showing through the lace layer looked like a sun-top. Its square lines were at odds with the lace. Altogether a weird look.
Autumn's was gorgeous, and much nicer than Harriet's.
Eugenie's was my second-favourite after Kate's.
Beatrice's was a big fat nothing. Not a wedding dress at all.
Diana's was a complete frocky horror. I don't think I've ever seen such a horrible wedding dress. Even by the standards of the Eighties, it was a fright. And it absolutely drowned her.
Fergie's was beautiful.
The Queen's was OK. Pretty. Nothing to write home about.
Camilla's was perfect for a second wedding.
This is the best picture I've seen of Autumn's dress. So pretty.