AMW continuing his effort to end the monarchy part 4

[simpsonthecat]

New thread. This is not ending

🤣 I actually was reading along seriously! Thinking 🤔 this could be true until I got to the end!! ( where I grew up boules was actually very popular we had a dedicated field and building)

Have we had any news about mandelson yet?

No that’s all fine very quiet as well

🤔 , I do hope that starmers resignation isn’t going to be used to distract! Or that they are attempting to blame it on him to hide others who were complicit.

Mandelson was a potential flight risk because he has in-laws overseas I think.

You make it quite clear that you dislike hypocrites, yet here you are being one yourself. You wrote that comment on this thread, which is why it's being discussed here. I brought Meghan up as an example of your inconsistency, not because the discussion is about her. If media reports are reliable when they suit your view of Meghan but suddenly your now saying they are unreliable that's a double standard.

Oh and just like you don't appreciate being labelled a hater ..no need to go labelling me as a supporter. Just another inconsistency here, happy to label others but if anyone labelled you, endless comments on how you aren't

Shame on me? Maybe you need to take a look in the mirror..?

Take it to the appropriate thread! , you are only making yourself look foolish here.

oh and welcome back !! Didn’t take long to reveal yourself.

I was just going to say - these threads are starting to feel reminiscent of times gone past 🤔

Yes very spookily familiar.

Why on earth are people insinuating @LipglossAndLies is someone else from long ago and we should all be wondering about that.
NCing is allowed and we can all be whoever we want and express the opinions we want within Talk Guidelines.
I find it quite rude actually and do agree there is an element of hypocrisy on this thread given that there are stories about the other couple designed purely for click bait consisting of no substance and no fact whatsoever

As for Andrew, I hope he enjoyed his two day break schmoozing his rich Arab friend, that might be it for a few years matey, go back to your dog walking on the Sandringham estate

And here you go! , excusing her for bringing others into this thread for no reason, defending her, why is that? , I’m critical of their actions and I won’t apologise for that or change my mind!
and yes I’m sceptical of all the rubbish in the dm , if anyone had checked I have in fact spent much time pointing out to people that the recent news is unlikely to happen and it purely click bait!
on this thread I have steered clear of mentioning them as it isn’t relevant and it’s Andrew we are discussing!
I don’t expect you to say anything in my defence but frankly it’s obvious which way the bias swings , and yes I do recognise posters when they use the same attacks and comments over and over again! And obviously I’m not the only one.

Yes @simpsonthecat these accusations of being someone else continue I have already cleared it up with MNHQ as they temp banned me after accusations before and if they continue I am going to start reporting posters for harassment.

Why people need to start attacking people personally instead of addressing points they make, labelling people as supporters, being someone else, I thought we were mature adults here ro discuss topics not act like children and insult people.

I don’t think you want to reveal that.

Why? It happened so I will speak about it if I want to. Here you are back accusing me again. Other people noticed your contradictions..does that mean they are all this person you elude to? Op just did is she this other person too?

If anyone had checked I have in fact spent much time pointing out to people that the recent news is unlikely to happen and it purely click bait!

Most of us who've paid attention know this, @jeffgoldblum; you've always been quick to remark the difference between what's reported and what's actually seen or heard, so I honestly wouldn't rise to those who wish to suggest something different

Frankly, you're much, much better than that

Which other people? , and I’m sorry but waxing lyrical about discussing things like adults and not attacking other posters after you very publicly came on here to attack me, makes you look like a hypocrite not me!
don’t worry though, I’m planning on not tagging or replying to you going forward.

Many thanks @Puzzledandpissedoff , I should have ignored it I know, I will going forward 🙏

I didn't attack you I asked you about your contradictions. I haven't labelled you a supporter and then accused you of being someone else as you have done to me.

What personal attack have I made towards you?

And if you are now pushing back on DM articles including those related to H&M then isn't that considered defending them and therefore by your own words does that make you a supporter of them?

Im just simply seeing these contradictions and asking you 💁‍♀️

Well said

Why is being “a supporter” considered a slur? how odd! If you spend your time defending and supporting someone that is exactly what you are, a supporter, it’s just a statement of fact 🤷🏻‍♀️.

What is the topic of this thread, please and how do your comments above relate?

re quoted, please pay attention to the bottom paragraph!

I haven't been back on this thread for a few days, so hadn't seen your question.

Yes, the Kensington Palace properties are owned and run by the Royal Household, not the Crown Estate.
That was made clear in the National Audit Office review, which had separate sections for each.
The review is linked here NAO review

As I said upthread, there are 12 properties within the security cordon, all of which have the rent reduction (tenants paying 60% market rates).
Beatrice, Eugenie and the Michaels have 3 of them.

I agree that there is an argument against the York sisters having accommodation there, and would not be at all surprised if that changes.

Having said that, the King is perfectly at liberty to do what he wishes with his private income (and the Privy Purse is not only the Duchy of Lancaster income).

Yes, the Kensington Palace properties are owned and run by the Royal Household, not the Crown Estate.

Sorry, that should have said the Kensington and St James' Palace properties are owned and run by the Royal Household.

The Household property portfolio is detailed in part 3 of the NAO document.

Thanks very interesting, I admit I know very little about these things.