Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
Thread gallery
7
Viviennemary · 11/04/2026 14:00

Taste of his own medicine was my first thought. I hate the way he uses charity work for self promotion.

Untailored · 11/04/2026 14:05

Had a little bet with myself when I saw this thread as to how long it would take for this to be Meghan’s fault. About 20 posts in, not bad.

Untailored · 11/04/2026 14:09

Viviennemary · 11/04/2026 14:00

Taste of his own medicine was my first thought. I hate the way he uses charity work for self promotion.

All the royals do charity work. It’s about all they’re useful for, to be fair.

Serenster · 11/04/2026 14:16

AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 11/04/2026 13:54

Yet suddenly there was a concerted media plan to make this global news and trash both Dr Chandauka’s and the charity’s reputation

As far as I know that is not at proven fact at this stage, only Dr Chandauka's allegation

It would be interesting to have the full details about the £500k consultancy bill: who were the consultants, what other work have they done in the sector, what the hourly our daily rate worked out as, how does that compare with industry standards, was the full expenditure agreed in advance or did the bill grow unexpectedly, what was the expectation of donations growth following implementation of the recommendations...

I'd also like to know who is funding the case. Hopefully the charity have considered this legal action calmly and decided that it's in the charity's interest to pursue this. It's certainly not helping Sentebale to distance themselves from the previous administration.

Personally I think this is likely to put off investors and donors even more.

I posted upthread, but the (verifiable) timeline was:

  • On 25 March 2025 Harry and Prince Seeiso made a public statement announcing they had resigned from Sentabale, leading to global coverage and a social media storm.
  • In the next two days there were very pro-Harry pieces in People magazine (a publication which we know Harry emails directly) and them from UK journalist Bryony Gordon (again, close to Harry).
  • On 31 March Sophie Chandauka was interviewed by Trevor Phillips.

Three news splashes in as many days from journalists and publications very close to Harry certainly sounds like a concerted media plan…

Bigcat25 · 11/04/2026 14:22

Recklessismymiddlename · 11/04/2026 10:50

But why was Meghan there, in the first place? Did she have an official role or was she muscling in, genuine question btw.

She thinks that being a duchess gives her an official role inwhatever she wants. She real believes in the superiority of being royal,

Mylovelygreendress · 11/04/2026 14:32

Untailored · 11/04/2026 14:05

Had a little bet with myself when I saw this thread as to how long it would take for this to be Meghan’s fault. About 20 posts in, not bad.

Who has said it’s Meghan’s fault ?

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 14:48

YourBreezyPanda · 11/04/2026 10:30

nope Meghan was trying to centre Sophie actually

It seemed to me that she was trying to place Sophie in a place in the line-up where she could be cropped out of the (finally published) picture, or certainly wouldn't be the centre of it. The finally published photo would always need to include Harry. Whoever was immediately to his left and right would probably be included (ie Meghan). A prime example being the picture attached to this puff piece from People. The only reason we know Sophie was at the event (before Harry's Sentebale resignation) was because Meghan made such a hoo hah about where Sophie had to stand, rather than be gracious and just letting the woman who organised the event stand where she wanted to. That fuss attracted unnecessary, negative press attention. Meghan was the least eligible person to be trying to hog centre place on that stage, let alone direct anyone else where to stand.

https://people.com/nacho-figueras-praises-prince-harry-work-netflix-polo-show-exclusive-8631488

Pleasealexa · 11/04/2026 14:55

Mylovelygreendress · 11/04/2026 14:32

Who has said it’s Meghan’s fault ?

I don't think it's M's fault but as a couple they blow up nearly every relationship they ever had. In most relationships there is a balancing partner, someone to talk the other one down...their dynamic is to escalate.

Starseeking · 11/04/2026 15:07

Starseeking · 11/04/2026 06:21

Based on all the press at the time this was going on, I would imagine there are some pretty damning emails in existence that Harry is unlikely to want to be made public. My guess is that this case will be settled out of court once both sides have seen the evidence being presented.

For anyone wanting further insight into the case, the Sentebale 2024 accounts, signed on 30 September 2025 by the auditors Buzzacott, make for some very interesting reading reading regarding events at the Charity covering 2023-2025:

https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search?p_p_id=uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=2&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&p_p_resource_id=%2Faccounts-resource&p_p_cacheability=cacheLevelPage&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_objectiveId=A17768275&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_mvcRenderCommandName=%2Faccounts-and-annual-returns&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_organisationNumber=4022923&_uk_gov_ccew_onereg_charitydetails_web_portlet_CharityDetailsPortlet_priv_r_p_organisationNumber=4022923

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 15:22

Thanks for this link @Starseeking. I see that H&M using that now infamous polo match to film their Netflix programme ended up costing Sentebale $136,000!

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 15:37

Page 73:

April 2024 - December 2024:
Transformation Actions and Governance Review
In parallel with the strategic fundraising efforts, a detailed governance review was completed between April and July 2024, followed by resolution of key issues from August 2024 onwards. This included agreeing transition plans for most of the then Board, some whose members had significantly exceeded recommended term limits.
However, between April and December 2024, Board functioning and fundraising operations experienced acute difficulties due to competing commercial interests, increasing interference, diversion and undermining of funding leads by one of the former patrons and some of the former trustees. The Chair raised governance and professional conduct concerns
with one former patron on 7 November 2024 and the then senior independent trustee on 11 November 2024, initially seeking private resolution through protected disclosures as a
whistleblower under English law.

December 2024 - March 2025:
Board Changes and Reputation Management
From December 2024, records show that action was covertly initiated to remove the Chair without cause by one of the former patrons and some of the former trustees. When mediation attempts and the governance concerns raised by the Chair, including in writing on 12 February 2025, received
no response, the Chair reported the matter to the Charity Commission through its whistleblowing procedure on 16 February 2025. Soon thereafter, two Board members resigned. The Chair also sought protection from the High Court of
Justice of England and Wales, using her own resources, for urgent injunctive relief on 5 March 2025 to protect her from
the ongoing unconstitutional attempts by one former patron and the remaining former trustees to remove her from office, beginning mid-February 2025. The Chair did not resign, staying committed to good governance and the team who understood the situation, as resignation would not serve the organisation’s long-term interests. On 6 March 2025, the High Court ordered a stay of proceedings and recommended mediation. The former patrons and remaining former trustees instead decided to resign with effect from 24 March 2025. A new Board from a pre- existing pool of prospective trustees that had already engaged with the charity for over a year was appointed on 25 March 2025 in accordance with the charity’s constitution.
On 25 March 2025, without notifying the charity, the former patrons and trustees briefed the press and made public announcements regarding their departure which included misleading and incorrect statements regarding the charity’s leadership, governance and operations, and financial position, resulting in sustained adverse media coverage in international and social media. Disinformation caused reputational damage to the charity and its leadership, potentially affecting public trust in the charity. In response, from 29 March 2025, and in order to protect the charity from serious harm, Sentebale publicly addressed the most damaging disinformation through responses to the press, Sentebale’s social media channels, the Financial Times and a Sky News interview.
Throughout this period, the charity’s Southern Africa-based senior executives supported the action taken by the Chair and the transition to a new Board, guided by their assessment of organisational values, commitment to due process, and the importance of the Transformation Agenda to beneficiaries and the long-term independence and sustainability of operations in Lesotho and Botswana.
April 2025 - August 2025:
Charity Commission Regulatory Engagement and Validation
The media interest in the charity prompted the Charity Commission to open a regulatory compliance case review on 3 April 2025 stating that “The regulator’s focus, in line with its statutory remit, will be to determine whether the charity’s current and former trustees, including its chair, have fulfilledtheir duties and responsibilities under charity law”.
The Charity Commission issued its case concluding statement on 6 August 2025 confirming that Sentebale had validly appointed Trustees in place to take the charity forward and presenting
a regulatory action plan for the Trustees to complete for the purposes of addressing past governance issues as identified
in the review. The charity welcomed the Charity Commission’s validation of the new Board and the Commission’s recognition of the much-needed governance reforms which had been the focus of the Chair’s concerns as she had reported to the Charity Commission in February 2025.
The governance-related actions prescribed by the Charity Commission’s action plan, which the charity has largely completed, included introduction of robust policies for addressing internal complaints and whistleblowing; implementation of constitutional dispute resolution procedures; introduction of a trustees’ code of conduct; and implementation of clear delegation frameworks including guidance for approaching the governance of any future patron relationship. Recruitment of further trustees to complement the current Board will commence this year.
In its statement responding to the Charity Commission’s concluding statement on 6 August 2025, Sentebale summarised the operational progress made since the start of 2025.
It noted that despite weathering a period of turbulence and
a shifting international funding landscape that has increasingly deprioritised Africa, the charity remains on track to directly serve at least 78,000 children and young people across Lesotho and Botswana this year, matching or exceeding its 2024 impact, while maintaining exceptional partnerships with governments, traditional leaders, and donors.
The continued implementation of transformation work has brought diligent focus on efficiency and stewardship, with senior executive leadership established in Southern Africa closer to operations, a more agile smaller Board able to respond quickly to organisational needs and Charity Commission requirements, and a cost-management programme reducing the charity’s cost base by approximately 25% (GBP£1million) on an annualised basis. These changes were executed without any reduction
in service delivery while retaining 92% of staff following completion of the global restructuring.
With these strong foundations in place, Sentebale can move forward with confidence - free from interference, committed to continuous improvement, and focused on delivering solutions addressing health, wealth and climate resilience for children and young people in Southern Africa.

Overtheatlantic · 11/04/2026 15:42

“Dr” chadsujka or whatever her name is is a fraud and Harry has done nothing wrong. Some of you are disgraceful, going after a young father who successfully escaped the highly toxic royal family. Are you angry because he married a black American?

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 15:43

Page 77 onwards has a table of all the alleged false statements by Harry and co and Sentabale's response to them.

ThePoshUns · 11/04/2026 15:46

Overtheatlantic · 11/04/2026 15:42

“Dr” chadsujka or whatever her name is is a fraud and Harry has done nothing wrong. Some of you are disgraceful, going after a young father who successfully escaped the highly toxic royal family. Are you angry because he married a black American?

Nice try 👏

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 15:46

Overtheatlantic · 11/04/2026 15:42

“Dr” chadsujka or whatever her name is is a fraud and Harry has done nothing wrong. Some of you are disgraceful, going after a young father who successfully escaped the highly toxic royal family. Are you angry because he married a black American?

Why are you so angry at a highly qualified, professional black woman calling his actions into question, to the extent that you are deliberately belittling her name and qualifications? That's rather racist of you, wouldn't you say? I'd say micro aggression, but I think it's just regular aggression.

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 16:01

Also, Harry is not a young father. He’s a middle aged father in his 40s, married to a middle aged woman in her 40s.

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 16:02

ThePoshUns · 11/04/2026 15:46

Nice try 👏

Is it a parody? Did someone get stuck in 2021?

Starseeking · 11/04/2026 16:11

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 15:22

Thanks for this link @Starseeking. I see that H&M using that now infamous polo match to film their Netflix programme ended up costing Sentebale $136,000!

I noted that too!

I work at a senior level in finance. You absolutely cannot put any of these statements into a set of accounts without them being substantiated.

The auditors will have had access to every single set of Board minutes, and although expenditure is reviewed on sample basis, something like the £500k consulting contract will be material for a £3m turnover charity, so will have been looked at. I imagine it’ll be someone like EY, KPMG or PwC etc who delivered that work; partners don’t get out of bed for less than £1,000 a day, plus they’ll have had all the minions doing the actual reviews for them lol

Dr Chandauka will, more likely than not, have ALL the receipts!

Rhaidimiddim · 11/04/2026 16:13

ThePoshUns · 11/04/2026 15:46

Nice try 👏

Actually it was a rubbish try. It makes Guest Speaker look lucid.

Bigcat25 · 11/04/2026 16:16

Overtheatlantic · 11/04/2026 15:42

“Dr” chadsujka or whatever her name is is a fraud and Harry has done nothing wrong. Some of you are disgraceful, going after a young father who successfully escaped the highly toxic royal family. Are you angry because he married a black American?

Don't expect to be taken seriously if you can't spell her name properly. Harry's supporters have never let facts or logic stand in their way though, just like H himself. An example from today is that the charity explained in their statement that the lawsuit isn't being funded with charity money, but in response H sid that it was a waste of charity funds.

Another example is the SS claiming that William is behind the suit, again with no evidence.

Greymatterwriter · 11/04/2026 16:18

AllJoyAndNoFun · 11/04/2026 08:17

i am not a Harry fan ( quite the opposite in fact) but nobody looks good here. It was obvious to anyone working in the sector that the charity was dead in the water from a funding perspective as soon as the toxic shitshow kicked off last year. No foundation or corporate funder is going to touch it and they’ve killed the golden goose ( the polo event) before lining up reliable new funding flows. While what the chair was seemingly trying to do ( localise leadership, diversify funding flows) was pretty mainstream and sensible strategy, how she went about it ( piss of existing funders, spend $500k on consultants to find new ones) was mind boggling. They should just shut it down and all move on and reflect on how they might have handled it better and how voluntary roles shouldn’t be all about you.

That was the feeling I got from what I saw at the time too. Neither side covered in glory. Two strong egos battling.

Rhaidimiddim · 11/04/2026 16:20

Indianrollerbird · 11/04/2026 15:43

Page 77 onwards has a table of all the alleged false statements by Harry and co and Sentabale's response to them.

Dear God! The very first point is that H helped himself to £67,000 of the charity's funds "covertly" to pay lawyers.

QueenOfHertz · 11/04/2026 16:25

Quick précis, please.

OP posts:
Starseeking · 11/04/2026 16:27

Rhaidimiddim · 11/04/2026 16:20

Dear God! The very first point is that H helped himself to £67,000 of the charity's funds "covertly" to pay lawyers.

I saw that about the legal fees as well, and chuckled.

Harry’s lawyers will have agreed a settlement and issued an apology long before this gets anywhere near a Court of Law.

QueenOfHertz · 11/04/2026 16:29

I always thought a young father would be under the age of 25. Meghan was over the age of 35 when she gave birth to Archie so medically speaking, she was geriatric then.

I’m

OP posts: