Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters continued. Thread 6

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 17/03/2026 11:47

For all PR disasters of Meg and Papa Sussex

OP posts:
Thread gallery
77
corblimeyguvnr · 27/03/2026 00:56

Let's be honest though - who the fuck would want a visit from sourpuss Harry ?

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2026 01:05

corblimeyguvnr · 27/03/2026 00:56

Let's be honest though - who the fuck would want a visit from sourpuss Harry ?

True ! I would rather a visit from Michael myers!

BemusedAmerican · 27/03/2026 01:23

You'd also have to go out and buy upscale hot chocolate for him, too.

Indianrollerbird · 27/03/2026 08:33

Hot choccie for Mr Grumpy Pants. Like a visit from an over-privileged toddler.

ShamedBySiri · 27/03/2026 08:50

There is an update on the petition to deny them public funding in Australia which now stands at 38,878 :

"UPDATE: Formal Request Sent to Government – Awaiting Response

Today, I have formally written to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, New South Wales Premier Chris Minns and Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan, seeking clear confirmation that no taxpayer funding or official support will be provided for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s private visit to Australia in April 2026.
This is not a minor issue.
I have now been contacted by multiple media outlets across Australia and internationally, reflecting the growing level of public concern and interest surrounding this visit.
As outlined in this petition, the visit includes ticketed commercial events, media engagements and private business activities. These must be treated strictly as a private matter.
At a time when Australians are facing rising mortgage stress, increasing energy and petrol prices, and ongoing cost of living pressures, public resources must be applied fairly and without preferential treatment.
I have requested written confirmation that:

  1. No taxpayer funds will be used
  2. No government resources will be deployed
  3. No official support or facilitation will be provided
We are now awaiting a response."

This isn't going away and I shall be intrigued to see the response (if there is one).

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 27/03/2026 09:06

The thing is, I can't see how any such guarantee could be issued. Because although Harry isn't entitled to any MORE security based on his own assessment of needs, he isn't entitled to any LESS security if a security need is indicated, a la Taylor Swift with bomb threats.

But it's interesting that 38k have signed the petition - do you have to be Australian to sign it?

StillSpartacus · 27/03/2026 09:25

I agree @TheNinkyNonkyIsATardisThis actually isn’t just about H&M but about public security of crowds and other issues that police and security services need to assess.

I think the same about security for Trump or Taylor Swift in the UK. It isn’t just about the individual. However the petition does make a useful point that will be noted by others (including those in a position to commission H&M services) - it’s not helping them, is it?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 27/03/2026 16:16

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2026 01:05

True ! I would rather a visit from Michael myers!

This made me proper 😂

BigWillyLittleTodger · 27/03/2026 16:21

However the petition does make a useful point that will be noted by others (including those in a position to commission H&M services) - it’s not helping them, is it?

Agreed, if Harry’s leaks are true and the Home Office are worried about a public backlash then this proves they should absolutely be concerned.

DancingFerret · 27/03/2026 16:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2026 17:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Now I’m definitely not a fan! But that seems a tad harsh and unnecessary, and honestly don’t think it’s the sort of thing we should post on mn .

ThePoshUns · 27/03/2026 17:27

Yea I’m not a fan but that FB post is beyond.

TheAutumnCrow · 27/03/2026 17:27

jeffgoldblum · 27/03/2026 17:24

Now I’m definitely not a fan! But that seems a tad harsh and unnecessary, and honestly don’t think it’s the sort of thing we should post on mn .

Yup. It’s horrible. Ageist, misogynistic and not in the spirit.

bluegreygreen · 27/03/2026 17:34

Yes, so far we have tried to avoid personal comments and conspiracy theories here.

DancingFerret · 27/03/2026 17:56

I did think hard about re-posting it as it is harsh, but decided to go with it as it shows the level of animosity they've attracted from some quarters in stark contrast to the popularity they enjoyed at the time of their wedding.

Edit: Typo.

AtIusvue · 28/03/2026 18:55

Telegraph:

Elizabeth II advised Prince Harry to wait a year before marrying Meghan Markle, a new biography has claimed.
Although the future Duchess of Sussex was initially welcomed into royal circles following the start of her relationship with Prince Harry, his grandmother reportedly expressed reservations.
Writing in his new biography of the late Queen, Hugo Vickers claims that she mentioned her concerns to the Duke.
Mr Vickers writes: “The Queen herself suggested that Harry should wait a year. He did not take her advice. Instead, as we know, the wedding went ahead just over six months after the couple’s engagement.”
Queen Elizabeth’s ambivalence about the couple’s marriage appears to have extended to the Duchess’s wedding dress.
Mr Vickers writes: “It was said that the Queen did not like the dress – too white and with ungainly shoulders. Someone close to the monarch told me her attitude to the actual wedding was: ‘You get on with it. It’s nothing to do with me’.”
The doubts about Meghan’s suitability as the wife of a prince appeared to be in contrast to the way the American actress had been welcomed into the fold after being introduced to his family by Prince Harry.
“Although the Prince would never have been allowed to marry a divorcee at an earlier time in Queen Elizabeth’s reign, the union was welcomed by a younger, more tolerant generation,” writes Mr Vickers in his book, Queen Elizabeth II, which is being serialised in the Daily Mail.
“Even the Royal Family seemed to be bending unspoken rules for Markle: unlike previous royal fiancées, she was invited to join the Queen and the Royal family at Sandringham for Christmas 2017, and attended church with the family.
“The staff at Sandringham joyfully surrounded the couple at the annual Christmas party and nicknamed the actress ‘Sparkle’.”

But senior members of the Royal family quickly became concerned that Prince Harry was rushing into things with someone who was ultimately unsuitable for the role.
Mr Vickers states: “Prince Philip, however, was not taken in. He referred to her dryly as ‘the American’.
“The view Prince William expressed privately – that Harry should take more time to get to know her – contributed to a lasting rupture between the brothers. But their father also had doubts.
“Prince Charles took the line that Lord Mountbatten had taken with him before he started courting Diana: have fun, but don’t marry her.”
Prince Harry and Meghan announced their engagement on Nov 27, 2017, and married just six months later in St George’s Chapel, Windsor, in what much of the public regarded at the time as a joyous occasion.
Mr Vickers claims that Prince Harry looked ill at ease at the Commonwealth Day service at Westminster Abbey in March 2019.
When the Duchess of Sussex used an overseas visit to Africa in the autumn of that year to tell Tom Bradby of ITN that she was struggling, it became apparent that relations with the wider Royal family could not continue as before.
Mr Vickers, who has written on royal affairs for nearly five decades, recounts how Harry returned from the couple’s holiday in Canada in January 2020 “keen to discuss a way forward with the Queen”.
He writes: “He wanted a half-in, half-out arrangement, whereby he would be self-financing but could still work for the Royal family.”
But the private secretaries to the Queen, Charles and William – Sir Edward Young, Sir Clive Alderton and Simon Case – were not willing to accede to the Prince’s proposal.
“Prince Harry flew to Sandringham and was told it was either all in or all out. He returned to Canada – reluctantly out,” stated Mr Vickers.
He claims the Queen took “a dim view” of her grandson’s decision, saying to a confidante: “And now Harry has opted out, and for what? To be a carer for Archie.”

OP posts:
BasiliskStare · 28/03/2026 19:03

@Atlusvue I think I can recall various commentators saying that M had pushed for an early wedding so she would be safe in her position. (Sorry don't have references ) But I suspect she was pushing on an open door with H.

AtIusvue · 28/03/2026 19:17

BasiliskStare · 28/03/2026 19:03

@Atlusvue I think I can recall various commentators saying that M had pushed for an early wedding so she would be safe in her position. (Sorry don't have references ) But I suspect she was pushing on an open door with H.

There was never going to be a long engagement because she was already mid/late thirties, so that rings true why she would push.

She was also being written out of Suits….this is all she had and had to move quick.

OP posts:
EmpressSisi · 28/03/2026 19:46

In other news…

There is no fool like an old fool, as they say!

PR disasters continued. Thread 6
BasiliskStare · 28/03/2026 21:08

AtIusvue · 28/03/2026 19:17

There was never going to be a long engagement because she was already mid/late thirties, so that rings true why she would push.

She was also being written out of Suits….this is all she had and had to move quick.

Also I think it has been documented by friends she came looking for a rich British boyfriend. So Harry would have fitted that bill nicely.

I do hope it was a coup de foudre . I mean that.

Westerlee · 28/03/2026 21:22

For a moment, I thought that was a picture of Meghan with her dad...

flapjackfairy · 28/03/2026 21:40

Westerlee · 28/03/2026 21:22

For a moment, I thought that was a picture of Meghan with her dad...

it is!

Westerlee · 28/03/2026 21:51

flapjackfairy · 28/03/2026 21:40

it is!

Oh thank God! I thought he'd just picked a partner who looked like his daughter! 😱

ThePoshUns · 28/03/2026 22:06

Christ here we go agin
Prince Harry hopes King will invite family to Sandringham this summer

https://www.thetimes.com/article/c83bfc2b-fbd1-434a-b060-72ab2c52f855?shareToken=f37a9cde97a0a7be8638e661ca9c67ad

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread