Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Duke of Sussex & Others vs ANL: thread 3

987 replies

bluegreygreen · 19/02/2026 13:46

This is the third thread discussing the case Prince Harry (and 6 others) are bringing against the Daily Mail (Associated Newspapers) for alleged unlawful information gathering (UIG).

Thread 1

Thread 2

Since the celebrities have given evidence, there has been limited direct reporting from court; what there is has mostly been on this link
Sky News link to court case

OP posts:
Thread gallery
51
Poppiesmocking · 31/03/2026 19:44

Justdancevance · 31/03/2026 16:19

Nicklin gave Sherborne a lot of leeway, hopefully that leaves little or ideally no room to appeal, and we can all move on. Also there could be some criminal investigations ?

If there isn’t sufficient evidence on the balance of probability than there certainly isn’t for beyond reasonable doubt.

Justdancevance · 31/03/2026 19:51

He got access to Leveson files as part of the ANL case and clearly couldn’t find anything there to use and ANL don’t have to keep records going back 20 + years.

Perhaps Elton can set David Sherborne up Brooklyn Beckham on his yacht.

David S would be salivating at the thought of another silly client with deep pockets and a complicated media relationship

NewAgeNewMe · 31/03/2026 19:52

Rhaidimiddim · 31/03/2026 19:39

Well, that didn,'t work for the Yorks. And they were without the narc rage.

I really doubt that the amount of crazy resentment these two feel could ever be parlayed into sensible behaviour. They are out to destroy the RF if they can.

I said they wanted to destroy the RF years ago. It’s the narcissistic rage. Their way or the high way. I was told at the time by various posters, that the Sussexes, were living their best life.

bluegreygreen · 31/03/2026 19:59

KatherineParr · 31/03/2026 18:58

Have they said when we can expect a verdict?

We haven't been given a definite date - I have read times varying from May to September.

What the judge said today:

At the end of the trial, Mr Justice Nicklin thanked everyone involved in the proceedings and stressed the importance of transparency.
He said: “The trial began on January 19 and since then the court has heard from a substantial amount of witnesses.
“The proceedings have been observed by a very large number of people… with attendance of people online running to hundreds on the busiest days.”
He later said that he will be working on the judgment “full-time” from the next legal term, adding: “I will be toiling away on the judgment.”

STV News summary

OP posts:
jeffgoldblum · 31/03/2026 20:01

bluegreygreen · 31/03/2026 19:59

We haven't been given a definite date - I have read times varying from May to September.

What the judge said today:

At the end of the trial, Mr Justice Nicklin thanked everyone involved in the proceedings and stressed the importance of transparency.
He said: “The trial began on January 19 and since then the court has heard from a substantial amount of witnesses.
“The proceedings have been observed by a very large number of people… with attendance of people online running to hundreds on the busiest days.”
He later said that he will be working on the judgment “full-time” from the next legal term, adding: “I will be toiling away on the judgment.”

STV News summary

Oh ! It’s going to be a long wait!! 😭

Rhaidimiddim · 31/03/2026 20:03

NewAgeNewMe · 31/03/2026 19:52

I said they wanted to destroy the RF years ago. It’s the narcissistic rage. Their way or the high way. I was told at the time by various posters, that the Sussexes, were living their best life.

I was married to a narc.

His rage, the time I finally stood up to him, lasted a year. A year of threats and soliticor's letters and no let-up until he won 9n one particular point. Then he could let go, once he'd finally beaten the bitch (me) into submission.

Markle is never going to let up because (a) she will never get a definitive win (she tried that with Oprah) and (b) the RF aren't going to be adopting the tactic of removing themselves from her attention - they can't.

They are stuck with her.

Given that the Soros foundation is funding her to create mayhem, she could actually cause the downfall of the RF.

Edited - 'paying' replaced with 'funding'.

KatherineParr · 31/03/2026 20:07

bluegreygreen · 31/03/2026 19:59

We haven't been given a definite date - I have read times varying from May to September.

What the judge said today:

At the end of the trial, Mr Justice Nicklin thanked everyone involved in the proceedings and stressed the importance of transparency.
He said: “The trial began on January 19 and since then the court has heard from a substantial amount of witnesses.
“The proceedings have been observed by a very large number of people… with attendance of people online running to hundreds on the busiest days.”
He later said that he will be working on the judgment “full-time” from the next legal term, adding: “I will be toiling away on the judgment.”

STV News summary

Thanks, I was afraid of that. I will struggle to wait until September 😂

ThePoshUns · 31/03/2026 20:11

So he’s lied to the court then in saying he never socialised with Charlotte Griffiths when he clearly has?

jeffgoldblum · 31/03/2026 20:16

ThePoshUns · 31/03/2026 20:10

With share token
Harry ‘shared intimate texts with journalist who called him Mr Mischief’

https://www.thetimes.com/article/e0c8e0e1-5542-4044-a8f4-e96012097e81?shareToken=2475bf227b04fb63822d7b8c4754362c

Wow thanks @ThePoshUns! Rather damning that! ( ps I sent you a pm )

Honestyboxy · 31/03/2026 20:17

ThePoshUns · 31/03/2026 20:10

With share token
Harry ‘shared intimate texts with journalist who called him Mr Mischief’

https://www.thetimes.com/article/e0c8e0e1-5542-4044-a8f4-e96012097e81?shareToken=2475bf227b04fb63822d7b8c4754362c

God the content of those texts is so cringeworthy. They sound so pathetically immature .

Honestyboxy · 31/03/2026 20:19

ThePoshUns · 31/03/2026 20:11

So he’s lied to the court then in saying he never socialised with Charlotte Griffiths when he clearly has?

He probably genuinely can’t remember . Like so many other things.

NewAgeNewMe · 31/03/2026 20:20

Rhaidimiddim · 31/03/2026 20:03

I was married to a narc.

His rage, the time I finally stood up to him, lasted a year. A year of threats and soliticor's letters and no let-up until he won 9n one particular point. Then he could let go, once he'd finally beaten the bitch (me) into submission.

Markle is never going to let up because (a) she will never get a definitive win (she tried that with Oprah) and (b) the RF aren't going to be adopting the tactic of removing themselves from her attention - they can't.

They are stuck with her.

Given that the Soros foundation is funding her to create mayhem, she could actually cause the downfall of the RF.

Edited - 'paying' replaced with 'funding'.

Edited

I’m sorry you went through that. If you have had a narc in your life, it’s easier to spot one.

Thedom · 31/03/2026 20:48

Who would have guessed ! Harry lying 👏👏

Is this the first time those messages were revealed ? Really damning for sure.

Lifestooshort71 · 31/03/2026 20:50

Not until September? Wow. Are they writing it up on an Etch A Sketch or similar? 😒

ThePoshUns · 31/03/2026 20:59

Thedom · 31/03/2026 20:48

Who would have guessed ! Harry lying 👏👏

Is this the first time those messages were revealed ? Really damning for sure.

I think so, they have been talked about but today I think they were released. I think to clarify he don’t naw himself Me Mischief, more that Charlotte refers to him as that, they sounded quite intimate.

HeddaGarbled · 31/03/2026 21:49

they sounded quite intimate

Oh, I don’t know. After the first one, she’s the one that’s pushing and I think he’s just being gallant.

They do prove that she was at least on the periphery of his social circle though.

CraftyGin · 31/03/2026 22:31

Prince Harry News March 31

GwendolineFairfax8 · 31/03/2026 22:39

Heard (but not verified) Nicklin is going to be promoted so will want to clear the decks before summer recess.

Baital · 31/03/2026 22:54

Isn't the point about other trials that the newspapers accused have admitted illegal activity?

So there is no 'reheating previous evidence ' in this trial, unlike trials against other newspapers that have made that admission?

ThePoshUns · 31/03/2026 22:56

Oh dear H has really fucked it up

Baital · 31/03/2026 23:00

I assume Griffiths wouldn't have provided the info if it wasn't verifiable. It would be a crazy thing to do. So it looks as if she was a bit more involved with H and his circle than H said at the trial.

Unless it was someone impersonating H, of course.