Sarah Ferguson - just as bad as Andrew?

[TheHaplessWit]

So whilst Epstein was serving house arrest following his conviction for sex trafficking young girls, Fergie sent him messages - from the BBC:

Some emails in the latest release appear to be between Epstein and Sarah Ferguson, Andrew's ex-wife.
One email dated 4 April 2009, was signed "Love, Sarah, The red Head.!!"
It says that she was going to be in Palm Beach and wanted to have tea. The email goes on to discuss ideas for Ferguson's company, Mother's Army. The former Duchess of York refers to Epstein as "My dear spectacular and special friend Jeffrey".
She calls him a "legend" and says "I am so proud of you".
The financier was still under house arrest for his 2008 conviction when the email exchange was sent.

Ignoring the money she took and questionable business arrangements, ignoring Andrews behaviour even (that's in another thread). How can any woman, who knows this man is trafficking young girls, act like this?

Please tell me she no longers receives any sort of public funding/housing from the tax payer?

He has no shame

There was chat for years and years that Prince Phillip was not Prince Edwards father. The Queen and D of E were getting on very badly at that point but absolutely couldn't divorce. The Queens racing manager was Lord Prochester (Porchie). He and the Queen were very close. The gossip was that he was PEs father.

That's what I don't understand at all. He clearly just doesn't understand he's done anything wrong. Any normal person would be hiding in a cupboard... for life.

Nah, he's meant to be Andy's Dad, not Edwards.

I think the whole Royal Family and their hangers on could be described as snouts in the trough.
The whole concept of Royalty. to me smacks of mental illness.

I'd be surprised if she wanted to draw too much attention to this 'initiative' TBH.

It was founded in 2017 then appears to have lain fairly dormant until 2023 when it was 98 days late in filing accounts.

She held a gala night in late 2023 which raised £1m but cost £280k while £650k was dumped in an interest bearing account.

The 2025 accounts show a very substantial drop in income in comparison to 2024 but an eye watering rise in salary costs which when combined with overheads appears to account for around 2/3 of the expenditure.

It really looks very much as though she's taken a leaf out of her parents' charitable playbook.

The whole greedy, unpleasant family disgusts me. Anyone else would have faced criminal investigation for what Andrew did. He is also still being protected and financed by his weak, complicit brother. It’s just plain wrong. The British taxpayer funds this family and this paedophile plus his greedy relatives live the life of Riley at our expense.

Absolutely agree. In the UK if she was over 16 we may have thought sleeve not paedo but sex trafficking is AND was a crime whether the victim was a child or an adult.

The fact she took his money, AFTER there was irrefutable proof of exactly what he is. (Not that im convinced she didnt know sooner)

Theyre both dangerous and entitled. My heart breaks for their daughters, grandchildren and wider family. Disgusting people

The one good thing about the possibility that Mandelson might be the subject of a parliamentary procedure, police investigation or some form of inquiry is that it will also drag ‘Trade Envoy Andrew’ and Sarah into the mix.

I'm just amazed there hasn't been more vociferous calling for the disgracefully sealed Trade Envoy records to be released.

I do think it might happen quite soon though.

Grabbing centre stage by any means and at any chance he gets has been his shameless MO since Newsnight.

At this point apart from his main co-trafficker no one who consorted with Epstein on his island, in his parties, on his plane has faced criminal charges - it’s not just Andrew.

And rich powerful men aside - in regular life the stats on bringing successful prosecutions for sexual assault and rape are depressingly low.

Andrew’s behaviour is disgusting as is the terrible system that protects men like him across most of the world.

I’d say depends how many other high profile people men are involved.

And the email she sent him congratulating him on the birth of his baby "boy", when he has never had children?! That seems very odd to me!
I'd say she's as bad as the rest; same as her husband, Mandelson, Trump et al. Anyone who dealt with Epstien has dirt on their hands.

I suspect that AMW and Fergie have a lot of dirt they could dish on each other so they have stuck together until now.

She obviously has had money at some point as she bought a house in 2022 for £4.25 million although she sold at a loss a few months ago.

The US allowed 29 men to sign secret deals - I hope they get named.

No, the gossip was that he was Prince Andrew's father.

Honestly it looked like he thinks the whole thing is hilarious!

According to the DM - Fergie took Beatrice and Eugenie (aged 20 and 19) to visit Epstein just 5 days after he was released from jail in Florida after his CSA sentence in 2009.

WTF was she thinking?

https://archive.is/n8aTW

Of course it was obvious, you weren’t paying attention as you said and don’t understand UK law as well as you think it seems.

The children’s act was passed 1989 in the UK, 17 is a child. Former PA - not a child, years older with DC of his own. Also in a trusted authority position.

If that’s not enough, the case then involves trafficking of a child from US to U.K.

Trafficking is also illegal at any age.

There is evidence of physical contact with victims and more direct involvement by former PA but she’s pretty despicable and ‘up there’ especially in how she’s fawned, colluded and seemingly been willing to expose and exploit her own DC in exchange for money.

I agree the person on the floor looks like a child in body, whether she is under 18 or not, we don’t know. I find it harrowing and damning.

She looks in a position of vulnerability and the way he is looming over her and especially the photograph with his hand on her stomach makes me feel physically sick.

I note some reporters are referring to her as being female rather than a woman.

He should be investigated and held to account. I’m glad he’s lost his titles but he’s seeing being propped up and protected in a way Joe Public wouldn’t.

He’s actually worse than Joe Public, as it’s become clear from the communications how far he also exploited our institutions and gave legitimacy and cover to the sexual exploitation of children and young women through his position in the RF.

The trafficked Russian woman is also worrying from a political and security perspective given the wider political context.

He should rightly be moving in to prison IMO, not protected because of who he is, free to ride around on horses at another royal residence.

And yet people are still insisting that the daughters are poor innocents in this whole shitshow? They would have known perfectly well why he was imprisoned yet presumably happily went along for the freebies.
And continued to associate with him over the following years.

I didnt realise she was till looking at articles she was and is awful like him.

To slightly play devils advocate for a moment, these exchanges were in 2008 when he was under house arrest on these charges. That means he was not yet convicted. Innocent until proven guilty? Once convicted and imprisoned as he was on lesser charges at state level not federal, there should definitely have been no further contact. As someone else stated, I don’t think either of them are very intelligent and Andrew in particular has always appeared to be extremely arrogant.

The author of Entitled was on Breakfast this morning - interesting that he believes Ferguson should be investigated for breaching charity laws. I wonder if there has been any investigation?