Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

William and tax on the Duchy of Cornwall

177 replies

GardenDancing · 31/12/2025 06:05

I keep reading that William doesn’t declare the amount of tax he pays on the Duchy of Cornwall. Apparently Charles did when he was Prince of Wales and sources say that William is paying appropriate tax, so why do you think he declines to be as transparent as his father was? I understand he isn’t obliged to share it, but people seemed annoyed and suspicious that he isn’t. If he’s paying appropriate tax like we are told, which I’m presuming is true, why wouldn’t he just share that to stop people speculating?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
CathyorClaire · 09/01/2026 20:16

FalseSpring · 09/01/2026 17:41

I wouldn't trust the Guardian on this and it definitely does not explain it very well at all.

Attempts at nationalisation of the Duchies back in the 1970s failed miserably and so they remain private assets (with oversight from Parliament). As private assets, failure of the Duchy would presumably result in the assets reverting to the settlor so they would descend down the royal line back to the deposed King as private assets.

The position of the Crown Estate is technically unclear although it is more likely to revert to the nation (but not necessarily and would depend on how the monarchy was abolished). Although the Estate's income and management was effectively exchanged for the Sovereign grant, legal ownership of the Estate has never been clarified in law. The question was asked in Parliament back in 2021 and the answer was "There is no precedent for what might happen to The Crown Estate land should the monarchy be abolished, and there is no such provision in statute."

Private assets don't require oversight from Parliament. Legitimate owners are also free to dispose of them without constraint.

I don't know what you mean by 'failure' of a Duchy. They are huge, aggressively driven commercial enterprises encompassing swathes of land located in diverse areas all over the UK and vanishingly unlikely to fail to return a substantial profit in any given year.

The position of the Crown estate is very clear. It was was turned over to the treasury in return for a fixed income (Civil List, not Sovereign Grant which is entirely another matter) and relieving the monarch of the responsibility for various governmental costs which were becoming unsustainable.

It belongs to the nation.

Ukisgaslit · 10/01/2026 08:20

FalseSpring · 09/01/2026 18:07

Your post unfortunately shows a complete lack of understanding of the nuances of law.

Well do elaborate .

Are you saying that the deposed king did continue to receive income from the Duchy of Lancaster? We know he did not .
He did not because he did not ‘ own’ the Duchy . He pocketed in money in right of ‘crown’ ie not as an individual but in role as king. No king , no duchy money

As for William becoming Catholic ( just a thought exercise - William is not in any way religious or spiritual ). He could not be become king . Could he still legally be heir if he cannot become king ? Very debatable. He could only pocket the millions as heir ( so we are told) .

The fact that constitutional lawyers would be arguing over the issue also illustrates that he does not own the Duchy.

I suspect when abolishment looms the Windsors will be happy to run for the hillls rather than face legal issues which have been suppressed and mounting back taxes owed.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread