Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William..?

349 replies

Shirleyynot · 21/11/2025 19:50

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

Allegedly.. Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William.. Meghan Markle's legal battle: Prince William title cuts threaten Sussex business empire

This extraordinary move, according to well-placed royal sources, stems from a palpable and growing fear that Prince William, once he ascends to the throne as King, may move to strip the former actress of her title, Duchess of Sussex.

This possibility has become terrifyingly real for the Californian-based royal following the recent, highly publicised, and definitive actions taken by King Charles III against his own brother, Prince Andrew. The King formally and unambiguously stripped Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of all his remaining royal titles, styles, and honours in October 2025, an unprecedented move designed to 'slim down' the monarchy.
This decisive act, reportedly urged on by William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales, has served as a stark and worrying pre-cursor for Meghan.

She is not prepared to wait for a fate similar to her disgraced uncle-in-law.
'Meghan's not taking any chances and she's willing to fight to keep her title,

Omg…

Prince Harry with Megan Markle

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William Over King Charles's Title Cuts: Report

Meghan Markle is planning to sue Prince William to protect her 'Duchess of Sussex' title from a future title cut, citing commercial interests.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
RainbowBagels · 23/11/2025 12:35

Mylovelygreendress · 23/11/2025 10:41

Because it’s a charity role not a paid role .

Surely she's 'supporting the RF while pursuing her own commercial interests'?

CurlewKate · 23/11/2025 14:11

Indianrollerbird · 23/11/2025 12:26

I wasn't complaining. I was asking the poster I was talking to what her opinion was as to why the titles shouldn't be removed. HTH.

Edited

I have a name! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Indianrollerbird · 23/11/2025 14:16

CurlewKate · 23/11/2025 14:11

I have a name! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Great, do you want to answer my previous question, then?

MrsLeonFarrell · 23/11/2025 15:40

RainbowBagels · 23/11/2025 12:35

Surely she's 'supporting the RF while pursuing her own commercial interests'?

I don't think it's quite that. To be a senior working royal you must represent the King. Beatrice is supporting one of the charities the King is involved with but she isn't representing him. She and Eugenie have roles in several charities and this is just another one.

I do think it's a fine line but there is a line.

bluegreygreen · 23/11/2025 16:12

The reporting is interesting (I see it's a New Zealand outlet) - 'King Charles appoints Princess Beatrice to new charity role after Andrew loses titles'.

The part they haven't reported is that Beatrice had been a trustee of Outward Bound for 6 years. When her term finished at the end of September Outward Bound announced she would shortly be taking on a new role. I don't see a clear role for the King in this decision.

The more interesting bit, digging a little deeper, is that Andrew stepped back from his role as patron in 2019 after the Newsnight interview. Since then, they appear not to have had an official patron (their formal documents lodged with the charity commission have the names of the 2 deputy patrons but no patron). The Duke of Edinburgh is obviously newly appointed, and I wonder if behind the scenes Andrew has been objecting to this as a clear final removal of his patronage.

JAL89 · 23/11/2025 18:27

BeeWitchy · 22/11/2025 21:45

Yes. It is shocking. It seems the Nazi beliefs never went away. They just went underground for a while. More than 70 years after we thought, hoped, it had been defeated and now we have some god awful politicians and would be politicians, encouraging the rise of nazism again. In the UK, across Europe, the US.

The despicable Nazi movement as neo nazis would not give up on their back up plan from WW2 as world white supremacist domination was their goal and always planned to rise covertly even linking all world fascist underground movements. With the now awful post exit governments of BJ and now KS you wonder if they will ever succeed now Britain is weakened. We are vulnerable and must pray this does not happen in anyway.

JAL89 · 23/11/2025 18:48

CurlewKate · 22/11/2025 17:43

It’s shocking how many Nazi sympathizers there were among the English upper classes. And actually more shocking how many among the intellectual classes…

Yes the propaganda of nazism was despicable. Even now with the neo nazi white supremacist movement linking all world fascist organisations each with their own aryan ideal and ideology the nazi sympathisers they are all agreed with Nazi ideals as key. This movement is awful thank God we have the strength to stand against them in all ways. So awful how some are drawn in.

JAL89 · 23/11/2025 18:59

I think M will struggle to sue PW though I know has been working so hard to set all of this up. M has been in America the whole summer while H has been over here trying to get closer to CW though from what we know has failed. Rejection of the case against PW will cause M much heartache I am sure now she is not a working RF member there seems no chance. Only time will tell.

CurlewKate · 23/11/2025 19:05

Indianrollerbird · 23/11/2025 14:16

Great, do you want to answer my previous question, then?

I thought I had-which question haven’t I answered?

Mylovelygreendress · 23/11/2025 19:18

JAL89 · 23/11/2025 18:59

I think M will struggle to sue PW though I know has been working so hard to set all of this up. M has been in America the whole summer while H has been over here trying to get closer to CW though from what we know has failed. Rejection of the case against PW will cause M much heartache I am sure now she is not a working RF member there seems no chance. Only time will tell.

Apart from a few days in September , when was Harry last in the U.K. ?

JAL89 · 23/11/2025 19:29

Mylovelygreendress · 23/11/2025 19:18

Apart from a few days in September , when was Harry last in the U.K. ?

I just meant M stayed in America with the reasons she gave.

Indianrollerbird · 23/11/2025 21:52

Indianrollerbird · 22/11/2025 20:39

Like what?

@CurlewKate

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 08:54

CurlewKate · 23/11/2025 19:05

I thought I had-which question haven’t I answered?

I was quite surprised to learn in the British media the Saxa Coberg Gotha family who are now the Windsors were a jewish german family when they arrived to take the throne. I know quite a lot of german and jewish families have come here and set root over the years since George I including the Rothschild family who I read in the media are jewish too. I suppose there are many german roots here as is understandable.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 08:55

I was quite surprised to learn in the British media the Saxa Coberg Gotha family who are now the Windsors were a jewish german family when they arrived to take the throne. I know quite a lot of german and jewish families have come here and set root over the years since George I including the Rothschild family who I read in the media are jewish too. I suppose there are many german roots here as is understandable.

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 08:57

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 08:55

I was quite surprised to learn in the British media the Saxa Coberg Gotha family who are now the Windsors were a jewish german family when they arrived to take the throne. I know quite a lot of german and jewish families have come here and set root over the years since George I including the Rothschild family who I read in the media are jewish too. I suppose there are many german roots here as is understandable.

Are you an AI bot? You have a very odd grasp of history.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 09:00

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 08:57

Are you an AI bot? You have a very odd grasp of history.

No I am not. I just read in the media. I dont know a lot about history. Somethings I have seen though. Do you think what I said is odd then?

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 09:05

What media are you reading, in that case? You are stating as fact some very strange things. Which member of the RF was a German Jewish person?

elessar · 24/11/2025 09:23

I’m so confused at how this thread about whether H&M will try and sue the RF over keeping their titles has descended into a discussion about naziism

Baital · 24/11/2025 09:43

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 09:00

No I am not. I just read in the media. I dont know a lot about history. Somethings I have seen though. Do you think what I said is odd then?

I have no idea where you are finding your sources, but you need to change them.

The Hanovarians were a German dynasty invited in BECAUSE they were Protestant (and therefore Christians).

The Saxe-Coburg-Gotha name became used because of who Queen Victoria married (Albert of SCG) and traditionally wives took their husband's surname/title. But she never used any other title than Queen and he was never king.

He was a minor German Protestant (Christian) prince.

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 09:52

Baital · 24/11/2025 09:43

I have no idea where you are finding your sources, but you need to change them.

The Hanovarians were a German dynasty invited in BECAUSE they were Protestant (and therefore Christians).

The Saxe-Coburg-Gotha name became used because of who Queen Victoria married (Albert of SCG) and traditionally wives took their husband's surname/title. But she never used any other title than Queen and he was never king.

He was a minor German Protestant (Christian) prince.

Thanks for injecting some sanity on the thread. This accords with what I have always understood.

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 09:54

It is true that the Rothschilds are Jewish-so there’s one fact….

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 09:57

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 09:54

It is true that the Rothschilds are Jewish-so there’s one fact….

Please Curlew don’t encourage it! (the comments.) 🙏

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:01

Baital · 24/11/2025 09:43

I have no idea where you are finding your sources, but you need to change them.

The Hanovarians were a German dynasty invited in BECAUSE they were Protestant (and therefore Christians).

The Saxe-Coburg-Gotha name became used because of who Queen Victoria married (Albert of SCG) and traditionally wives took their husband's surname/title. But she never used any other title than Queen and he was never king.

He was a minor German Protestant (Christian) prince.

This is genuine royal information and many converted to be accepted in Christian Britain. I was surprised though as we all know many families are not open about their pasta and heritage. As you say Saxa Coberg Gotha married to the Hanoverians and this holds true as you say. Since then we have the present RF and previous history of germany led to much conversion and escape. I will not suggest you delve deep into the history books for more facts though you will find from knowledgeable sources these facts are correct.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:02

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 09:54

It is true that the Rothschilds are Jewish-so there’s one fact….

Thank you. A well researched and knowledgeable person.

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 10:02

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:01

This is genuine royal information and many converted to be accepted in Christian Britain. I was surprised though as we all know many families are not open about their pasta and heritage. As you say Saxa Coberg Gotha married to the Hanoverians and this holds true as you say. Since then we have the present RF and previous history of germany led to much conversion and escape. I will not suggest you delve deep into the history books for more facts though you will find from knowledgeable sources these facts are correct.

Name your sources. What website or author?

Swipe left for the next trending thread