Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William..?

349 replies

Shirleyynot · 21/11/2025 19:50

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

Allegedly.. Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William.. Meghan Markle's legal battle: Prince William title cuts threaten Sussex business empire

This extraordinary move, according to well-placed royal sources, stems from a palpable and growing fear that Prince William, once he ascends to the throne as King, may move to strip the former actress of her title, Duchess of Sussex.

This possibility has become terrifyingly real for the Californian-based royal following the recent, highly publicised, and definitive actions taken by King Charles III against his own brother, Prince Andrew. The King formally and unambiguously stripped Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of all his remaining royal titles, styles, and honours in October 2025, an unprecedented move designed to 'slim down' the monarchy.
This decisive act, reportedly urged on by William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales, has served as a stark and worrying pre-cursor for Meghan.

She is not prepared to wait for a fate similar to her disgraced uncle-in-law.
'Meghan's not taking any chances and she's willing to fight to keep her title,

Omg…

Prince Harry with Megan Markle

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William Over King Charles's Title Cuts: Report

Meghan Markle is planning to sue Prince William to protect her 'Duchess of Sussex' title from a future title cut, citing commercial interests.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
SleepingStandingUp · 24/11/2025 10:03

Andrew didn't lose his titles to slim down the monarchy, but for bringing the establishment into disrepute. hence why no one else has lost their titles.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:04

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 09:57

Please Curlew don’t encourage it! (the comments.) 🙏

Edited

Look jeffgoldblum why dont you 'Fly' off and do some checking rather than sitting on the wall watching everyone.

Sadcafe · 24/11/2025 10:07

Andrews titles were removed because Charles is sensible enough to recognise the damage being done to the royal family by allowing him to keep them. Harry might be an absolute pain in the royals backside and Meghan even more so, but it’s hardly the same level. Realistically, if Harry and Meghan don’t want to be working royals,why should they cash in on the title

Kimura · 24/11/2025 10:38

Imagine reading that and taking it seriously. Clickbait nonsense that's worked like a charm.

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 10:42

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 09:57

Please Curlew don’t encourage it! (the comments.) 🙏

Edited

Oh god-sorry ! I didn’t think. Actually, this thread has obliterated my ability to think……😢

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 10:46

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:04

Look jeffgoldblum why dont you 'Fly' off and do some checking rather than sitting on the wall watching everyone.

Why don’t you start your own thread about nazism and history instead of taking over someone else’s thread with irrelevant nonsense? !

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 10:48

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 10:42

Oh god-sorry ! I didn’t think. Actually, this thread has obliterated my ability to think……😢

I’m not surprised! Me too , but as derails go they have managed to completely shut down the thread , so there’s that I suppose 🤷‍♀️

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 10:51

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 10:42

Oh god-sorry ! I didn’t think. Actually, this thread has obliterated my ability to think……😢

Are you able to elaborate on your point made above, with exactly how there are better ways to slim down the monarchy (better than removing the Sussex titles, which you seem very keen for them to keep) without causing a media furore? I’m intrigued to know what changes you think the media won’t be in a furore about.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:53

I am not going to provide quotes from books and history websites at present. Here is a bit of open internet information from many people linked to the proud heritage of the SCG family and Hanoverians who are well researched including many jews

Source: Quora https://share.google/1esU4uqvH6OcOmULy

This is not a website I use regularly for information though is known and well trusted in Britain and worldwide.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:58

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 10:46

Why don’t you start your own thread about nazism and history instead of taking over someone else’s thread with irrelevant nonsense? !

Look jeffgoldblum I was speaking about proud jewish heritages in Britain not Nazism and the present British RF. I can speak about more than one subject. You say I am speaking about nazism here and am not. Nazism is a dated and hideously idealistic oppressive system designed only for war and terror. As I have said I do not stand for this at all.

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 11:02

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:53

I am not going to provide quotes from books and history websites at present. Here is a bit of open internet information from many people linked to the proud heritage of the SCG family and Hanoverians who are well researched including many jews

Source: Quora https://share.google/1esU4uqvH6OcOmULy

This is not a website I use regularly for information though is known and well trusted in Britain and worldwide.

OK, thanks I will evaluate that source. Just so you know, it is very rude to write "jews" you should write "Jewish people". I am sure you meant no offence and that you understand that having relatives of different religions is not a stain on anyone's character. Unfortunately, this is how your writing is coming across.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 11:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 11:07

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 10:51

Are you able to elaborate on your point made above, with exactly how there are better ways to slim down the monarchy (better than removing the Sussex titles, which you seem very keen for them to keep) without causing a media furore? I’m intrigued to know what changes you think the media won’t be in a furore about.

I’d be happy to discuss with you. But your comment that I am eager for the Sussexes to keep their titles, despite several posts saying otherwise, suggests that you are not posting in good faith, so I refer you to several other posters on this thread who have made sensible suggestions you might find interesting.

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 11:08

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 11:07

I’d be happy to discuss with you. But your comment that I am eager for the Sussexes to keep their titles, despite several posts saying otherwise, suggests that you are not posting in good faith, so I refer you to several other posters on this thread who have made sensible suggestions you might find interesting.

Ah, cop out, ok.

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 11:10

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:58

Look jeffgoldblum I was speaking about proud jewish heritages in Britain not Nazism and the present British RF. I can speak about more than one subject. You say I am speaking about nazism here and am not. Nazism is a dated and hideously idealistic oppressive system designed only for war and terror. As I have said I do not stand for this at all.

You are aware that continually posting comments that are completely unrelated to the thread you are on is classed as derailing and against mn guidelines on this board?

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 11:17

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 11:10

You are aware that continually posting comments that are completely unrelated to the thread you are on is classed as derailing and against mn guidelines on this board?

M and H are part of the family and they are reviewing history to bring the legal case M is preparing. If slavery is used as part of the legal case a jewish family history can be too and this is very important to acknowledge.

TightlyLacedCorset · 24/11/2025 11:21

'The Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle—a woman who has successfully navigated the worlds of acting, charity, and royalty'

Can somebody tell me when this 'successful' navigation of Royalty happened?

I think this article is probably nonsense...however perhaps there is some sort of... dissatisfaction, fear perhaps of the possibility being spoken about behind closed doors.

I'm for the titles being removed. We don't need Duke/Duchess Sussex or a Princess Lillibet or Prince Archie. Due to a series of increasingly tiresome scandals, which they have had a sizeable hand in creating (and I do not omit that Andrew has been the major agitator) the Royal family now stands at the precipice of Republicanism. Besides, they are not working Royals. They work for themselves (which is all very good) although using their titles as social fluency, even going so far as insisting on being announced by them in spaces almost devoid of people judging by the recent HB article, which is ridiculous and totally self aggrandising and self serving...and have either of them stepped one foot in Sussex?

There's nothing she could do anyway. But does this fluff piece hint at some real anxiety and give the unspoken communication that dirt would be flying if such a move was seriously proposed in the future? I'd say yes.

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 11:23

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 11:17

M and H are part of the family and they are reviewing history to bring the legal case M is preparing. If slavery is used as part of the legal case a jewish family history can be too and this is very important to acknowledge.

Apart from the fact that this doesn’t make sense, there is no case being prepared, it’s rumour and gossip and as already discussed here , there is no basis that Meghan can sue for a title that was gifted through her husband from a U.K. monarchy.
slavery has no part and those posts were deleted.

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 11:25

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 11:17

M and H are part of the family and they are reviewing history to bring the legal case M is preparing. If slavery is used as part of the legal case a jewish family history can be too and this is very important to acknowledge.

FFS slavery is not going to be used as part of a legal case, let alone nazism!

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 11:31

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 11:08

Ah, cop out, ok.

Nope. Just not prepared to be misrepresented. Show me where I have said I am “very keen for the Sussexes to keep their titles and I am happy to re engage.

Baital · 24/11/2025 11:59

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:53

I am not going to provide quotes from books and history websites at present. Here is a bit of open internet information from many people linked to the proud heritage of the SCG family and Hanoverians who are well researched including many jews

Source: Quora https://share.google/1esU4uqvH6OcOmULy

This is not a website I use regularly for information though is known and well trusted in Britain and worldwide.

Good God, if that's what you are relying on as a source, it explains a lot.

Sorry to continue the derail! I will ignore any further idiocies...

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 12:00

CurlewKate · 24/11/2025 11:31

Nope. Just not prepared to be misrepresented. Show me where I have said I am “very keen for the Sussexes to keep their titles and I am happy to re engage.

Edited

Well you have literally said up thread that they shouldn’t lose them and given no explanation why other than to avoid a media furore, and posited that this furore won’t happen if they slim down in ways other than stripping the Sussex titles. So unless you can explain that position, and how a furore is to be avoided, then I will have to draw a conclusion that the Sussexes retaining their titles is a desirable outcome for you.

I find that position illogical from a republican, and nonsensical that you would care about the RF being involved in a media furore - when have they not been since the Sussexes left, and when will that be abating, because there’s no sign of it so far. I have given my reasons why they should lose the titles. Avoiding a media furore is not one of them. The Sussexes will forever be in the background making noise, and that noise will soon move on to their children when they are older and being pitted against their cousins. There’s no stopping that noise, but stopping them using the titles for monetary gain is something that can be done.

For the record, I would take the royal titles and dukedoms from all non working royals from within QEII’s grandchildren and all cousins from that generation. None of their children to have titles until and if they become working royals, save for the immediate heir to the throne, who will be granted his title, “Prince of Wales” upon reaching 18.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 12:05

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 11:23

Apart from the fact that this doesn’t make sense, there is no case being prepared, it’s rumour and gossip and as already discussed here , there is no basis that Meghan can sue for a title that was gifted through her husband from a U.K. monarchy.
slavery has no part and those posts were deleted.

Ms past and the history of her family are part of any legal case including slavery as M has mentioned herself and the last time M accused the family of racism so openly as caused the great rift between H and his father CW and as part of any potential legal move as that is what we are discussing here, family histories must be discussed and revealed including jewish heritage as the past of M and taking the titles as would hurt and affect M so much and the fact there is open talk in the world of the RFs jewish heritage this will affect how M does feel. A case for suing as has been said. A definite relevance most definitely as is plain to see.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 12:08

Baital · 24/11/2025 11:59

Good God, if that's what you are relying on as a source, it explains a lot.

Sorry to continue the derail! I will ignore any further idiocies...

Well you can check each reference on the site for confirmation and look the proof up yourself if you can deny all is true.

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 12:11

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 12:05

Ms past and the history of her family are part of any legal case including slavery as M has mentioned herself and the last time M accused the family of racism so openly as caused the great rift between H and his father CW and as part of any potential legal move as that is what we are discussing here, family histories must be discussed and revealed including jewish heritage as the past of M and taking the titles as would hurt and affect M so much and the fact there is open talk in the world of the RFs jewish heritage this will affect how M does feel. A case for suing as has been said. A definite relevance most definitely as is plain to see.

Enough! Please stop posting at me , I have no idea what you are talking about.
im going to just scroll on by .