Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William..?

349 replies

Shirleyynot · 21/11/2025 19:50

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

Allegedly.. Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William.. Meghan Markle's legal battle: Prince William title cuts threaten Sussex business empire

This extraordinary move, according to well-placed royal sources, stems from a palpable and growing fear that Prince William, once he ascends to the throne as King, may move to strip the former actress of her title, Duchess of Sussex.

This possibility has become terrifyingly real for the Californian-based royal following the recent, highly publicised, and definitive actions taken by King Charles III against his own brother, Prince Andrew. The King formally and unambiguously stripped Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of all his remaining royal titles, styles, and honours in October 2025, an unprecedented move designed to 'slim down' the monarchy.
This decisive act, reportedly urged on by William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales, has served as a stark and worrying pre-cursor for Meghan.

She is not prepared to wait for a fate similar to her disgraced uncle-in-law.
'Meghan's not taking any chances and she's willing to fight to keep her title,

Omg…

Prince Harry with Megan Markle

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William Over King Charles's Title Cuts: Report

Meghan Markle is planning to sue Prince William to protect her 'Duchess of Sussex' title from a future title cut, citing commercial interests.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
BemusedAmerican · 22/11/2025 13:27

I was being sarcastic.

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 13:28

FancyBiscuitsLevel · 22/11/2025 11:48

One Thing for those who are more avid royal watchers than me - there does seem to have been a flurry of “when William becomes King” stories being dripped into the papers recently.

What’s going on? Is the King sicker than we’ve been told so everyone is preparing for imminent change of monarch? Or has William finally started thinking about the future and what he wants? Or is it there’s been too much upset around the way the late Queen then the King handled the Andrew scandal, so it’s more of a “don’t demand change, William will be King soon and he’ll be different” marketing/spin strategy ?

It does seem to be a bit too much of the same to just be a coincidence.

They say they are trying to recover PWs reputation after he went on the front pages of the tabloids saying he had 'the most terrible year' or annus horribilis and how awful it was for him when KW and CW almost died of cancer and how thoughtless it was for him considering how KW had suffered and had not even pulled through. She has stood by him now. What has happened now with 'A' has juts rubbed salt in the wound of public opinion and they are trying to recover PWs reputation as he was once well thought of and certainly better than now. J

FuzzyWolf · 22/11/2025 13:36

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 12:20

lol Mary of Teck's first name was really Victoria. They called her Mary because of Victoria I presume...

Well Victoria was called Alexandrina so I’m not sure of that logic either.

Indianrollerbird · 22/11/2025 13:42

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 13:28

They say they are trying to recover PWs reputation after he went on the front pages of the tabloids saying he had 'the most terrible year' or annus horribilis and how awful it was for him when KW and CW almost died of cancer and how thoughtless it was for him considering how KW had suffered and had not even pulled through. She has stood by him now. What has happened now with 'A' has juts rubbed salt in the wound of public opinion and they are trying to recover PWs reputation as he was once well thought of and certainly better than now. J

Come On What GIF by MOODMAN

.

MeouwKing · 22/11/2025 13:50

Will she then be "Megan Mountbatten-Windsor-Markle"?

MeouwKing · 22/11/2025 13:51

Maybe drop the "Windsor" and be known as MMM?

Fairgamer · 22/11/2025 13:59

MeouwKing · 22/11/2025 13:50

Will she then be "Megan Mountbatten-Windsor-Markle"?

No because I think she doesn't get along with her father and then adopted her husband surname. They are called 'of Sussex' no? I don't think this would change with or without any title.

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 14:02

FuzzyWolf · 22/11/2025 13:36

Well Victoria was called Alexandrina so I’m not sure of that logic either.

All seems a bit odd though they all in history seem to have a name they are known by and an official birth given name. Maybe they choose? I know they avoid conflict while the eldest royal is alive in the name they are known by officially. Once they die the new senior royal can assume the name. Things are different now maybe? Lilibet could be Elizabeth now if not Christened that way as QE2 has passed away. J

RainbowBagels · 22/11/2025 14:28

Eh? The Late Queen and her mother were both Elizabeth. Lilibet could have been Elizabeth while The Queen was alive. Would save the poor child having a godawful baby name when she's an adult anyway.

myrtleWilson · 22/11/2025 14:47

Who is KW who didn't pull through? Why are you signing off your posts with a J? Lilibet wasn't called Lilibet because there was a Queen called Elizabeth still alive. Are you actually AI hallucinating?

Ohpleeeease · 22/11/2025 15:15

Perhaps the people of Sussex will sue Meghan Markle for bringing shame on their county’s good name.

jeffgoldblum · 22/11/2025 15:34

CathyorClaire · 21/11/2025 19:58

Oh, I hope so.

🍿🍿🍿

Me too! , it would be so entertaining 🤣

jeffgoldblum · 22/11/2025 15:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Wtf ! Why are you posting this disgusting links on here!!!
and it’s particularly disgusting to tag an American poster to do it .

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 15:39

PH stepped down from all royal duties some years ago and now his security is not being paid for especially having fallen out with the RF so unanimously as was seen in world media so often. For PH and MM to keep the titles is a bit odd. When someone is no longer in a role or doing any work and it has been announced they have left and stopped doing their work they usually lose their title. For example if the DG of the BBC kept his title it would not hold having openly resigned stopped doing any work and put it all over the front pages of the paper. The RF is technically an hereditary employed role with a governing purpose above government in the British governing system with the king being the head of state at present CW. I wonder what the former DG of the BBC will be calling himself. He certainly will not be continuing to be paid in any way wherever he lives. J

CurlewKate · 22/11/2025 15:40

Sounds completely bonkers. Apart from anything else, what would William gain from taking the Sussex’s titles away? Surely he’d be best advised to just let them carry on and not draw any attention to them.

Indianrollerbird · 22/11/2025 15:48

CurlewKate · 22/11/2025 15:40

Sounds completely bonkers. Apart from anything else, what would William gain from taking the Sussex’s titles away? Surely he’d be best advised to just let them carry on and not draw any attention to them.

Why would a republican want these randoms to hold UK royal titles?

tempname1234 · 22/11/2025 15:50

Well, she could become a working royal and actually earn her title. BUT we all know she thought she’d get the title, earn loads of money in American without doing anything to support the UK as a member of the royal family. Tough luck toots.

CurlewKate · 22/11/2025 15:59

Indianrollerbird · 22/11/2025 15:48

Why would a republican want these randoms to hold UK royal titles?

I don’t care whether they keep their titles or not. I just think William taking them away would be a bad move for him. Far better for him to rise above them and not give them the oxygen of more publicity.

Indianrollerbird · 22/11/2025 16:04

CurlewKate · 22/11/2025 15:59

I don’t care whether they keep their titles or not. I just think William taking them away would be a bad move for him. Far better for him to rise above them and not give them the oxygen of more publicity.

Surely William looking bad is good for the republican movement?

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 16:05

RainbowBagels · 22/11/2025 11:38

Was she an actress? An American agent? They didnt go to America. They went to France. The only thing that was covered up was that The KING was a Nazi sympathiser and probable traitor. She didnt want to marry him. The establishment knew they needed to get rid of him but kept his actions secret and we had decades of 'Oh how terrible Wallis Simpson' blah blah when she did everyone a huge favour after the Windsors produced a wholly unsuitable person as Head of State during wartime. They then needed decades of propoganda about how awful it was for the RF and how the Queen Mother blamed her for her chain smoking husbands death and how The Queen was so traumatised by the abdication that she couldnt possibly do it herself when the abdication was mainly about saving the RF from the consequences of the beliefs and actions of their own.

Edited

very rotten and said to be a Nazi sympathizer and everyone knows the National Democratic Socialist Workers party or Nazi party did not stand for RFs so was stupid or trying to selfishly look after himself only and leave Britain to the Nazis as Socialists and run off to the US and probably not France if that had happened so was a betrayer and evil if what you say is true. Before long the files will be made openly available as Public Information. Damning for any family let alone a RF considering the shame and betrayal of the British now with CW Head of State. He must have been openly known to be in the USA as they would have had ways of finding out his talk after all. J

Mylovelygreendress · 22/11/2025 16:07

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 16:05

very rotten and said to be a Nazi sympathizer and everyone knows the National Democratic Socialist Workers party or Nazi party did not stand for RFs so was stupid or trying to selfishly look after himself only and leave Britain to the Nazis as Socialists and run off to the US and probably not France if that had happened so was a betrayer and evil if what you say is true. Before long the files will be made openly available as Public Information. Damning for any family let alone a RF considering the shame and betrayal of the British now with CW Head of State. He must have been openly known to be in the USA as they would have had ways of finding out his talk after all. J

Maybe I am missing something but who/ what is CW?

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 16:09

Mylovelygreendress · 22/11/2025 16:07

Maybe I am missing something but who/ what is CW?

Charles

myrtleWilson · 22/11/2025 16:10

So who is KW who didn't pull through @JAL89 and why do you sign off your posts with an initial?

JAL89 · 22/11/2025 16:15

myrtleWilson · 22/11/2025 16:10

So who is KW who didn't pull through @JAL89 and why do you sign off your posts with an initial?

I say KW as Kate. I just sign off as J

Mylovelygreendress · 22/11/2025 16:17

She is known as Catherine .