Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William..?

349 replies

Shirleyynot · 21/11/2025 19:50

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

Allegedly.. Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William.. Meghan Markle's legal battle: Prince William title cuts threaten Sussex business empire

This extraordinary move, according to well-placed royal sources, stems from a palpable and growing fear that Prince William, once he ascends to the throne as King, may move to strip the former actress of her title, Duchess of Sussex.

This possibility has become terrifyingly real for the Californian-based royal following the recent, highly publicised, and definitive actions taken by King Charles III against his own brother, Prince Andrew. The King formally and unambiguously stripped Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor of all his remaining royal titles, styles, and honours in October 2025, an unprecedented move designed to 'slim down' the monarchy.
This decisive act, reportedly urged on by William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales, has served as a stark and worrying pre-cursor for Meghan.

She is not prepared to wait for a fate similar to her disgraced uncle-in-law.
'Meghan's not taking any chances and she's willing to fight to keep her title,

Omg…

Prince Harry with Megan Markle

Meghan Markle Is 'Preparing To Sue' Prince William Over King Charles's Title Cuts: Report

Meghan Markle is planning to sue Prince William to protect her 'Duchess of Sussex' title from a future title cut, citing commercial interests.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/meghan-markle-preparing-sue-prince-william-over-king-charless-title-cuts-report-1756764

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 12:59

WTF has MAGA Marjorie got to do with anything?

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 12:59

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 12:57

😂😂😂 Absolute nonsense. You don’t even understand what you are talking about. In the remote chance that she’ll bring an emotional distress claim (remote because the causational bar is high, there is zero precedent in these circumstances, and she’d need some solid medical evidence to back up a claim - do you think Meghan wants her psychiatric state laid out in court?), it won’t be based on slavery and the supposed Jewish ancestry of the current royal family.

Now please just stop with your nonsensical, AI posts.

Bravo 👏

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:01

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 12:59

WTF has MAGA Marjorie got to do with anything?

No idea 🤷‍♀️ but it’s as relevant as all the other posts.

RainbowBagels · 24/11/2025 13:02

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 12:33

You knowledge is incorrect. The kind of case M will build is a civil case and feelings are well respected and the cost of hurt is valued fully as well as the loss of business and hurt the loss of business brings about. This can in fact be far more lucrative than the value of the lost business most definitely. Psychological backgrounds are always considered including publicly available information as can affect the mind of M in calculating the civil criminal settlement. Some knowledge for you.

You can claim additional damages for pain and suffering but first you need to prove a loss, and that that loss was as a result of a wrong done to you. You cannot sue someone purely for hurty feelings. You cannot sue for something that hasn't been done because you are worried it might happen! This story is utter nonsense and Quora is not a reputable source in the UK or anywhere.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:12

RainbowBagels · 24/11/2025 13:02

You can claim additional damages for pain and suffering but first you need to prove a loss, and that that loss was as a result of a wrong done to you. You cannot sue someone purely for hurty feelings. You cannot sue for something that hasn't been done because you are worried it might happen! This story is utter nonsense and Quora is not a reputable source in the UK or anywhere.

I fully agree with what you said regarding legal proceedings as match all I say. An additional point big if the loss of earnings is proved to be a civil crime then Ms laws will have to almost immediately present a case for the hurt etc. Considering we are discussing the whole case not just the first bit your point is load of tosh.

Quora is known to take down malicious gossip, untruths and wild claims about the RF so can be seen as reliable. Check the claims from jews etc in the article I quickly found and tell yourself if you are correct. All are flying a flag for the RF and just happen to be jewish.

sequinpanties · 24/11/2025 13:15

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 12:15

Bastards. They should be sent to a Penne-tentiary.

Barack Obama Applause GIF by Obama

.

sequinpanties · 24/11/2025 13:21

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 10:53

I am not going to provide quotes from books and history websites at present. Here is a bit of open internet information from many people linked to the proud heritage of the SCG family and Hanoverians who are well researched including many jews

Source: Quora https://share.google/1esU4uqvH6OcOmULy

This is not a website I use regularly for information though is known and well trusted in Britain and worldwide.

Dummy Feeling Dumb GIF

What?

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 13:25

I did point out to the poster that using 'jews' is offensive but presumably that is intended now?

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 13:29

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 13:25

I did point out to the poster that using 'jews' is offensive but presumably that is intended now?

I agree. It’s bordering on racist, and there’s absolutely no rhyme or reason why that poster keeps banging on about alleged Jewish heritage within the RF. Do they think we are going to hate the RF if they have Jewish ancestors? Or is this some anti semitic trope against the RF?

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:34

Talltreesbythelake · 24/11/2025 13:25

I did point out to the poster that using 'jews' is offensive but presumably that is intended now?

Yes you did and bringing slavery in when those posts were deleted for being inflammatory, it seems very purposeful.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:34

sequinpanties · 24/11/2025 13:21

What?

The information on the truth editted quora site stream I found is quite detailed and even a person like the one in your gif can understand. They even seem to have RF family tree information and very detailed information about the families themselves. Many say they are jewish and jews are known as great record keepers and scholars in this world. Perhaps join quora and ask them for their lifes bibliography and a reference section listing all quoted knowledge and I expect the posters will be able to provide you with one.

Mylovelygreendress · 24/11/2025 13:35

MrsLeonFarrell · 24/11/2025 12:36

Please list a civil case where feelings were more important than facts. The bottom line is Meghan cannot sue over any potential loss of title because she doesn't own the title in her own right. It's a courtesy title.

Harry could potentially sue which would be hilarious.

In the OW interview Meghan insisted that titles were not important to her .
Why not give it up ? The late Duchess of Kent was known as Mrs Kent during her later life .

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:39

Mylovelygreendress · 24/11/2025 13:35

In the OW interview Meghan insisted that titles were not important to her .
Why not give it up ? The late Duchess of Kent was known as Mrs Kent during her later life .

Because she lied and obviously when appealing to an American audience being truthful about her love of titles would have gone down like a bag of sick.

BemusedAmerican · 24/11/2025 13:41

I'm trying hard not to envision H & M, with David Shelbourne, in front of the UK equivalent of Judge Judy.

Ypur court system really can't sell streaming rights? Think of the viewing numbers.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:45

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 13:29

I agree. It’s bordering on racist, and there’s absolutely no rhyme or reason why that poster keeps banging on about alleged Jewish heritage within the RF. Do they think we are going to hate the RF if they have Jewish ancestors? Or is this some anti semitic trope against the RF?

This stream is about a legal case for M and slavery and family history is very much important to mention including any belief systems involved. Indianrollerbird M has already accused racism on the RF you have mentioned racism I have not or xenophobia. Now this stupidity should be left and all can move on to more legal points on this stream.

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 13:45

BemusedAmerican · 24/11/2025 13:41

I'm trying hard not to envision H & M, with David Shelbourne, in front of the UK equivalent of Judge Judy.

Ypur court system really can't sell streaming rights? Think of the viewing numbers.

You can watch the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, but not the High Court/District Courts/Magistrates Courts/Crown Courts at first instance hearings.

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:47

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:47

BemusedAmerican · 24/11/2025 13:41

I'm trying hard not to envision H & M, with David Shelbourne, in front of the UK equivalent of Judge Judy.

Ypur court system really can't sell streaming rights? Think of the viewing numbers.

No it’s not allowed, that’s why you get those amusing drawings.😁

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:48

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:34

Yes you did and bringing slavery in when those posts were deleted for being inflammatory, it seems very purposeful.

This stream is about a legal case for M and slavery and family history is very much important to mention including any belief systems involved. Now this stupidity should be left and all can move on to more legal points on this stream. All discussion is very important for a rounded and good understanding of what the lawyers for M will be presenting in the civil courts.

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 13:48

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:45

This stream is about a legal case for M and slavery and family history is very much important to mention including any belief systems involved. Indianrollerbird M has already accused racism on the RF you have mentioned racism I have not or xenophobia. Now this stupidity should be left and all can move on to more legal points on this stream.

Yes, please stop your absolute stupidity that shines through every one of your nonsensical posts.

Mylovelygreendress · 24/11/2025 13:50

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:48

This stream is about a legal case for M and slavery and family history is very much important to mention including any belief systems involved. Now this stupidity should be left and all can move on to more legal points on this stream. All discussion is very important for a rounded and good understanding of what the lawyers for M will be presenting in the civil courts.

WTF has slavery to do with this ??

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:50

Stream? 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

jeffgoldblum · 24/11/2025 13:55

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 13:45

You can watch the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, but not the High Court/District Courts/Magistrates Courts/Crown Courts at first instance hearings.

Apologies, I thought you couldn’t stream any court proceedings in the U.K. , I stand corrected 👍

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 13:57

Mylovelygreendress · 24/11/2025 13:50

WTF has slavery to do with this ??

Nothing. Nor Jewish people. Nor alleged Jewish ancestry within the RF. Nor Marjorie Taylor Green.

JAL89 · 24/11/2025 13:58

Indianrollerbird · 24/11/2025 12:57

😂😂😂 Absolute nonsense. You don’t even understand what you are talking about. In the remote chance that she’ll bring an emotional distress claim (remote because the causational bar is high, there is zero precedent in these circumstances, and she’d need some solid medical evidence to back up a claim - do you think Meghan wants her psychiatric state laid out in court?), it won’t be based on slavery and the supposed Jewish ancestry of the current royal family.

Now please just stop with your nonsensical, AI posts.

Phycological distress is the where the real money is. Imagine how much a lengthy behind closed doors legal case with top lawyers would cost to run in entirety and then at the end they all pay for the entire legal case and M or PH pay their lawyers and the other all the court costs and their own legal fees to divide up the money M would lose estimated for not being called by her gifted title. Not a lot a can tell you. The details are discreet and private and those in the public eye do not mind at all revealing psychological knowledge and are rarely in court at that point. You are not aware of the process and have not done maths as they say.