Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

What about Beatrice & Eugenie?

723 replies

olderandnonthewiser · 19/10/2025 23:26

I’m not sure what to think tbh. On one hand they must be so so mortified; on the other they enjoy all the perks of Royalty and their position in the RF despite their revolting father.

How do you see it?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:13

Calliopespa · 20/10/2025 12:07

Well I would hate to have their existence, so yes, "poor girls."

And the grounded and decent is because I don't know of anything either of them has done apart from get married and start their own families, and Beatrice has done quite a bit of work around dyslexia.

So no, I am not going to deem them guilty till proven innocent, but rather the other way round. What is the "evidence" you refer to?

ETA but you are right, they are older than I tend to remember.

Edited

Firstly, they are not "girls".
Secondly they have had significant financial benefits from their parents "contacts" including gifts from various people, which has been explained upthread.
Thirdly, they are fully appraised of what their parents have been up to. They can be under no illusion. However, they have always been happy to benefit, even after the Maitlis interview.
Finally, Beatrice has not done "a lot of work around dyslexia". She has spoken of her own situation. Her engagement with this is minimal.
I hope, if they are decent women (not girls) they will at least distance themselves from their parents. I doubt it, though

Allergictoironing · 20/10/2025 12:14

reversingdumptruckwithnotyreson · 20/10/2025 11:59

But even if she was pimped as opposed to trafficked, it’s still just as exploitative and abhorrent? I don’t understand trying to excuse it.

A legality. Prostitution per se isn't against the law whereas trafficking is. I completely agree it does NOT excuse his behaviours, just whether he has broken the law or not.

familychristmas · 20/10/2025 12:15

I feel very sorry for them that their parents let them be around these people ? Surely a huge risk. I don’t think they should be judged in any way over this and I expect both were probably oblivious to what was really going on.

Imdunfer · 20/10/2025 12:18

lifeonmars100 · 20/10/2025 10:49

Are you for real? Do you have no understanding about abuse, grooming, trafficking, power imbalance, and the vulnerability of very young women enmeshed in a world of predatory and perverted adults. Any decent man especially one who was aged 41 and a father of two girls of a similar age would be repulsed by being offered a 17 year old girl to use for sexual gratification.

None of those are paedophilia and yes i know about them.

Paedophilia is sex with children, not sex with already sexually active amd physically mature 17 year olds over the legal age to marry.

Nobody is saying what happened between Andrew and Virginia was right but it wasn't paedophilia.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/10/2025 12:18

familychristmas · 20/10/2025 12:15

I feel very sorry for them that their parents let them be around these people ? Surely a huge risk. I don’t think they should be judged in any way over this and I expect both were probably oblivious to what was really going on.

Well they're old enough to be well aware now but still no statement is forthcoming saying they don't endorse these terrible people even if their parents do. Wonder why that is...

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:18

I think it's very interesting how people infantilise Beatrice and Eugenie. They're 35 and 37, both married with children, but people carry on as if they're still at school. It's very odd.

Calliopespa · 20/10/2025 12:20

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:18

I think it's very interesting how people infantilise Beatrice and Eugenie. They're 35 and 37, both married with children, but people carry on as if they're still at school. It's very odd.

Edited

That is true.

I guess part of it is because we now all realise things were going on in the background when they were still at school, and have some sympathy for that. But yes, they are older than I tend to think of them being. Maybe part of it is they look quite young.

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/10/2025 12:20

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:18

I think it's very interesting how people infantilise Beatrice and Eugenie. They're 35 and 37, both married with children, but people carry on as if they're still at school. It's very odd.

Edited

Agree. The same people who clamber to claim VG was basically an adult at 17 years old persistently refer to two women in their thirties as girls.

RainbowBagels · 20/10/2025 12:21

MojoMoon · 20/10/2025 09:58

Does the jumble sale ribbon cutting really need to be done?

Most of the charity work done by the extended family is very low profile (Prince and Princess Michael of Kent, Sophie) so it doesn't even particularly help a charity get more views on social media or engagement from the public. What's the ROI on having them as your patron? Pretty small I imagine. Better off with a YouTuber or TikTok creator.

A slimmed down Royal family of just William and family, plus Anne and Edward + Sophie until they die, will still get the main jobs of royalty (outside the role of King) done, namely state dinners, Duke of Edinburgh Award and Buckingham Palace window waving. Anne and Edward may easily have another 20 years left in them given the age their parents went on to so by then the three children in immediate family are well old enough to be doing their bit.

The number of people that excited to meet a minor royal or so interested in what they are doing that they suddenly donate to a charity for the first time is probably pretty tiny.

Agree. Much of what they do is 'busywork' and even then, extremely part time. Its not needed and makes no material difference. Not to mention William doesn't want to bother with it anymore.
They can invite the rest of them to garden parties and balconies if they want. But William, Kate, the Edinburgh's and then the kids are easily able to do the work of the RF. Hopefully they will take less money too, but they are vary adept at avoiding a cut in the money they receive.

PhuckTrump · 20/10/2025 12:22

Imdunfer · 20/10/2025 12:18

None of those are paedophilia and yes i know about them.

Paedophilia is sex with children, not sex with already sexually active amd physically mature 17 year olds over the legal age to marry.

Nobody is saying what happened between Andrew and Virginia was right but it wasn't paedophilia.

Edited

Again. The accusation/word “pedophilia” does not feature in the post you’ve quoted.

Imdunfer · 20/10/2025 12:23

Rosscameasdoody · 20/10/2025 11:03

If she was trafficked she wasn’t capable of consent, so if not a paedophile what do you think that makes him ?

An abuser if he knew she was trafficked.

But not a paedophile.

That term needs reserving for people who have sex with children. She was not a child in anything but a legal "not yet an adult" sense. It devalues the vile behaviour of paedophiles to call a man having sex with an apparently willing 17 year old a paedophile.

Calliopespa · 20/10/2025 12:23

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/10/2025 12:20

Agree. The same people who clamber to claim VG was basically an adult at 17 years old persistently refer to two women in their thirties as girls.

Is it the same people?

CatHairEveryWhereNow · 20/10/2025 12:23

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:18

I think it's very interesting how people infantilise Beatrice and Eugenie. They're 35 and 37, both married with children, but people carry on as if they're still at school. It's very odd.

Edited

Seems to be done to a lot of RF members - I wonder if it's because they are in public eye from young age and people don't update their world view.

I think they'll be fine - even if they do eventually have to throw one or both parents under the media bus. I suspect they'll be kept at arms length from rest of RF for a while then slowly and understately brought back - less sure if Willaim takes lead any time soon though.

EverybodyLTB · 20/10/2025 12:23

familychristmas · 20/10/2025 12:15

I feel very sorry for them that their parents let them be around these people ? Surely a huge risk. I don’t think they should be judged in any way over this and I expect both were probably oblivious to what was really going on.

Oblivious? Do we think Beatrice queried as to why she was given £750k by a Turkish millionaire for a ‘wedding gift’ months before the actual wedding? A millionaire who there is evidence to suggest obtained a British passport thanks to Prince Andrew? If one of my mums random mates gave me 750,000 I’d be curious. Eugenie also had numerous payments from this person but in smaller chunks like 10-15k at a time. ‘Poor girls’ must be very bloody oblivious!

familychristmas · 20/10/2025 12:24

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/10/2025 12:18

Well they're old enough to be well aware now but still no statement is forthcoming saying they don't endorse these terrible people even if their parents do. Wonder why that is...

Yes very true. A statement of some sort would be appropriate but I doubt they will.

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:24

Calliopespa · 20/10/2025 12:20

That is true.

I guess part of it is because we now all realise things were going on in the background when they were still at school, and have some sympathy for that. But yes, they are older than I tend to think of them being. Maybe part of it is they look quite young.

No, I think they look like women in their mid 30s, and I'm not being rude. They certainly don't look like teenagers!
Some of this was going on when they were younger, yes. Some of it well into their adulthood.

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:25

EverybodyLTB · 20/10/2025 12:23

Oblivious? Do we think Beatrice queried as to why she was given £750k by a Turkish millionaire for a ‘wedding gift’ months before the actual wedding? A millionaire who there is evidence to suggest obtained a British passport thanks to Prince Andrew? If one of my mums random mates gave me 750,000 I’d be curious. Eugenie also had numerous payments from this person but in smaller chunks like 10-15k at a time. ‘Poor girls’ must be very bloody oblivious!

Yep. Snouts in the trough. "Poor girls"? Nope.

familychristmas · 20/10/2025 12:25

EverybodyLTB · 20/10/2025 12:23

Oblivious? Do we think Beatrice queried as to why she was given £750k by a Turkish millionaire for a ‘wedding gift’ months before the actual wedding? A millionaire who there is evidence to suggest obtained a British passport thanks to Prince Andrew? If one of my mums random mates gave me 750,000 I’d be curious. Eugenie also had numerous payments from this person but in smaller chunks like 10-15k at a time. ‘Poor girls’ must be very bloody oblivious!

Without sounding rude I get the impression that they probably take a lot for granted and when you’re floating around in such a privileged life anyway you could be very naive in general. I’m not saying they lack intelligence but perhaps common sense and insight.

MauriceTheMussel · 20/10/2025 12:26

AgathaMayhem · 20/10/2025 07:24

They won't be mortified or ashamed because they will have their father telling them the press are lying, it's a smear campaign, you know how the media lie about things, Giuffre was lying, I never even met her, she was mentally unstable and fabricated stories, none of it is true, I'm the victim here.
And they will believe him.
He isn't going to be admitting the truth to them. He will lie, lie, lie.
And they will believe his lies and stand by daddy.

He’s telling all the rest of us that, and we don’t believe him. £12m pay out when you’re innocent? Nah. Come off it.

Imdunfer · 20/10/2025 12:27

PhuckTrump · 20/10/2025 12:22

Again. The accusation/word “pedophilia” does not feature in the post you’ve quoted.

Read the post that my post was in answer to.

Calliopespa · 20/10/2025 12:27

familychristmas · 20/10/2025 12:25

Without sounding rude I get the impression that they probably take a lot for granted and when you’re floating around in such a privileged life anyway you could be very naive in general. I’m not saying they lack intelligence but perhaps common sense and insight.

Agreed. I am sure their existence is way weirder in so many ways that we cannot imagine.

I certainly don't envy their situation.

janamo · 20/10/2025 12:28

I'm not 100% convinced that William when King will do much at all to any of the RF. OK he might slim things down a bit and send Andy to Coventry, but you can bet a million that he will not voluntarily trim down the "cost" of the monarchy, or re gift Royal resources to public ownership, or reduce his income.

I hope I'm 100% wrong though.

MrsSlocombesCat · 20/10/2025 12:30

I found out before my father died that he had 'forced himself' on women. So he was a rapist. I immediately changed my last name to my mum's maiden name but couldn't go NC because he was living with me! But after he died I stopped referring to him as dad and used his first name. I refused to arrange a funeral or collect his ashes.

DelectableMe · 20/10/2025 12:32

How horrific for you, @MrsSlocombesCat . You did the right thing, though 💐

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 20/10/2025 12:32

Imdunfer · 20/10/2025 12:23

An abuser if he knew she was trafficked.

But not a paedophile.

That term needs reserving for people who have sex with children. She was not a child in anything but a legal "not yet an adult" sense. It devalues the vile behaviour of paedophiles to call a man having sex with an apparently willing 17 year old a paedophile.

When you talk about a willing 17 year old are you meaning Virginia Giuffre or just a generic 17 year old?

Because if it's the former you are wrong:
Ms Giuffre also claimed that she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions, including when she was 17 at the home of his friend Ghislaine Maxwell in London, in 2001

Quote taken from here BBC News - Met Police looking into claims Andrew sought information on accuser
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3970mxwz9vo