Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Netflix deal to end

1000 replies

AtIusvue · 22/07/2025 22:51

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/35969847/prince-harry-meghan-netflix-deal-axed/

Netflix deal is over

  • Both decided a statement won’t be released “Publicly, there will not be a statement and of course, if things change dramatically, they’d be open to a one-off project down the line.”
  • Talk about Paramount plus

It’s been pretty obvious for a while. No talk about the Archewell productions arm, the film they were making etc.

How long can As ever last when they won’t have NF to back it up with WLM infomercials.

Meghan Markle holding a bag of pretzels in a kitchen.

Prince Harry and Meghan’s £100million deal with Netflix SCRAPPED

PRINCE Harry and wife Meghan’s £100million deal with Netflix has been scrapped. The streamer will not renew their contract when it expires in September. The Sussexes and Netflix have mutually decid…

https://www.thesun.co.uk/royals/35969847/prince-harry-meghan-netflix-deal-axed/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
45
Vespanest · 26/07/2025 15:55

It's not that deep for me, they were both snitches without credibility. People love the gossip but not necessarily the gossiper. Unfortunately for Meghan Harry has some protection that there's a belief she influenced him. Whether UK or US there needs to be a concrete reason to stab your family in the back. They haven't been able to draw a line, it's now who they are. It's why reality TV would have been their best option, not sure if that is even an option now.

Profhilodisaster · 26/07/2025 16:35

If they went down the reality tv route, would she be able to maintain the persona that she (tries and fails ) to portray now- good friend , kind , totally in love with Harry, fabulous mum etc.

IdaGlossop · 26/07/2025 17:25

Profhilodisaster · 26/07/2025 16:35

If they went down the reality tv route, would she be able to maintain the persona that she (tries and fails ) to portray now- good friend , kind , totally in love with Harry, fabulous mum etc.

Odds on not!

EmpressSisi · 26/07/2025 17:32

Profhilodisaster · 26/07/2025 16:35

If they went down the reality tv route, would she be able to maintain the persona that she (tries and fails ) to portray now- good friend , kind , totally in love with Harry, fabulous mum etc.

It just wouldn’t work. Harry and Meghan aren’t interesting enough to carry a reality show. Meghan plays the serene, goofy “faux feminist,” Harry the affable protector — it’s all curated, polished, dull. No one tunes in to watch happy, well-adjusted millionaires play house in Montecito.

People want tension, stakes, and conflict. The royals were their villain arc, but now the Firm is grey-rocking them. No drama, no storyline. They can’t keep slamming the media while constantly courting attention — it’s hypocritical. Without showing their kids, the “family” angle falls flat. Even Doria seems over it.

The only real draw would be behind-the-scenes turmoil — a fractured marriage or a royal reconciliation. But the first is too exposing, and the second will never happen on camera (if at all). And let’s be honest: Meghan would never risk the world seeing the real Harry — sulky, miserable, and entitled. And she certainly wouldn’t want anyone seeing the real her, hidden behind years of rebranding attempts. The mask always slips eventually.

If they were going to do this, they should have done it early — in the first year or two, before Oprah, before Spare. They could’ve had years of audience goodwill, watching them try to find their feet outside the monarchy. People might have connected with their story of rebuilding. Instead, we got whinging about William getting an extra sausage and Catherine recoiling when Meghan fingered her lip gloss.

Too late now. The moment’s passed.

Cynic17 · 26/07/2025 18:55

CatKings · 25/07/2025 18:21

I think people underestimate the interest in Diana now, unless it’s scandal.
No one wants a documentary now that portrays her as a saint, we all know she wasn’t.

Agreed, but if he could produce unseen home movie footage, it would sell. If that footage exists, who might have it? The King? No chance. William? No chance. The Spencers? Very possible. But.... the Spencer sisters seem to have been discreet, and tried to be fair to both W and H so, no chance.
Charles Spencer? Well, he likes being on telly, and he has turned up for Harry occasionally, but I think he's also very conscious (& pleased about) being uncle to the next king. He won't do anything to upset King William...... (in a very "Jane Seymour's brothers in Wolf Hall", kind of way). So..... no chance.
And then it's just rehashed, familiar clips.....

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/07/2025 19:07

Rhaidimiddim · 25/07/2025 19:06

I've read the first 9 pages at the start of this thread, and skim-read the rest. With one exception the usual superfans seem to be noticeably absent.

Edited

Embarrassment perhaps, Rhaidimiddim?

TBF it can't be easy to have been one who hammered away about what total stars the Spotify and Netflix deals "proved" them to be, only to watch them trash all of it by their own poor choices and total lack of ability - and that's without their many claims which were said to have "proved" this and that, only for many to have turned out to be lies

Vespanest · 26/07/2025 20:09

Not sure if this has been shared, but what's meant to be a fan edit explains why Meghan remains controversial, her supporters cannot help themselves with toxicity. her support as well as her detractors remain as much in the them versus the royals as much as the pair themselves.

x.com/aseversussex/status/1948204035846082597?s=46

Rhaidimiddim · 26/07/2025 20:11

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/07/2025 19:07

Embarrassment perhaps, Rhaidimiddim?

TBF it can't be easy to have been one who hammered away about what total stars the Spotify and Netflix deals "proved" them to be, only to watch them trash all of it by their own poor choices and total lack of ability - and that's without their many claims which were said to have "proved" this and that, only for many to have turned out to be lies

Or waiting for the cheque to clear...

CoffeeCantata · 26/07/2025 21:12

Vespanest · 26/07/2025 20:09

Not sure if this has been shared, but what's meant to be a fan edit explains why Meghan remains controversial, her supporters cannot help themselves with toxicity. her support as well as her detractors remain as much in the them versus the royals as much as the pair themselves.

x.com/aseversussex/status/1948204035846082597?s=46

My, that’s a classy little nugget!

They are a joy, the Sussex Squad. I think what I hate most about them - and there’s a long list of- is the way H& M never comment, criticise or try to rein them in. Or simply dissociate themselves from them. I imagine they’re partly in denial about how vile they are partly terrified of them.

Profhilodisaster · 26/07/2025 21:28

Before I had twigged about the SS and being fairly new to Twitter, I asked a question about Meghan , I didn't say anything defamatory and the question wasn't a nasty question . Before I knew it I was being called absolutely vile names and had all sorts of evil wished upon me. It seems that they search everyone that posts to find out if you are a Meghan fan and if not they unleash their venom .
They really are seriously deranged .

LaMarschallin · 26/07/2025 22:22

Vespanest · 26/07/2025 20:09

Not sure if this has been shared, but what's meant to be a fan edit explains why Meghan remains controversial, her supporters cannot help themselves with toxicity. her support as well as her detractors remain as much in the them versus the royals as much as the pair themselves.

x.com/aseversussex/status/1948204035846082597?s=46

Is that just clips of Meghan in Suits?
Do her fans think it was real?

BasiliskStare · 27/07/2025 03:41

This a bit off piste & I am sure it is a slow news day. But I think the point it serves is that the RF provide financial security . No worrying about a lovely roof over your head , bills , school fees etc. & yes it comes with restrictions. But is it possible H & indeed M are realising that the circumstances H grew up in don't come cheap when you are having to provide for your own financial security . & being a prince of the realm doesn't actually matter increasingly if you are not part of the WRF and demonstrably don't have the wherewithal to earn the money you think you need. I don't know.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-14943535/kate-william-adelaide-fort-belvedere.html

ETA - I think I have driven past this and you will get road noise from the A3 I am sure. Not the point. I know. 😂

Kate and William consider leaving Adelaide Cottage for a grander home

For three years, the Prince and Princess of Wales have brought their children up at Adelaide Cottage, a peaceful refuge in the grounds of Windsor Castle.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-14943535/kate-william-adelaide-fort-belvedere.html

CoffeeCantata · 27/07/2025 07:16

Profhilodisaster · 26/07/2025 21:28

Before I had twigged about the SS and being fairly new to Twitter, I asked a question about Meghan , I didn't say anything defamatory and the question wasn't a nasty question . Before I knew it I was being called absolutely vile names and had all sorts of evil wished upon me. It seems that they search everyone that posts to find out if you are a Meghan fan and if not they unleash their venom .
They really are seriously deranged .

I’ve noticed a recurring phrase on Celebitchy which seems very characteristic of the SS when anyone mildly questions anything Meghan does. Someone will say “Take Meghan’s name out of your mouth!” I think it’s a hate site, but clearly it’s nothing compared to X. It’s horrifying but fascinating to see that absolutely NO criticism of M, however mild and benign, is tolerated on there. Even someone who suggested that she might cut 4 inches off her hair was attacked as if they’d insulted her. As you say, if you’re not a totally dedicated (ie brainwashed) super-fan, you’re the enemy.

Whatever happens with H & M in the future it will be very interesting to see how things play out with this phenomenal bunch of harpies.

hepsitemiz · 27/07/2025 07:27

Vespanest · 26/07/2025 20:09

Not sure if this has been shared, but what's meant to be a fan edit explains why Meghan remains controversial, her supporters cannot help themselves with toxicity. her support as well as her detractors remain as much in the them versus the royals as much as the pair themselves.

x.com/aseversussex/status/1948204035846082597?s=46

Wow! Some (maybe all?) of the SS are frankly deranged in the head. Whether they came with pre-existing psychological disorders I’m not sure 🤔 but probably. Why would a person of healthy mind want to ally themselves with such a group?

NewAgeNewMe · 27/07/2025 07:34

Vespanest · 26/07/2025 20:09

Not sure if this has been shared, but what's meant to be a fan edit explains why Meghan remains controversial, her supporters cannot help themselves with toxicity. her support as well as her detractors remain as much in the them versus the royals as much as the pair themselves.

x.com/aseversussex/status/1948204035846082597?s=46

That is so bizarre.

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 07:41

BasiliskStare · 27/07/2025 03:41

This a bit off piste & I am sure it is a slow news day. But I think the point it serves is that the RF provide financial security . No worrying about a lovely roof over your head , bills , school fees etc. & yes it comes with restrictions. But is it possible H & indeed M are realising that the circumstances H grew up in don't come cheap when you are having to provide for your own financial security . & being a prince of the realm doesn't actually matter increasingly if you are not part of the WRF and demonstrably don't have the wherewithal to earn the money you think you need. I don't know.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-14943535/kate-william-adelaide-fort-belvedere.html

ETA - I think I have driven past this and you will get road noise from the A3 I am sure. Not the point. I know. 😂

Edited

That looks like quite a depressing house as well.
What's wrong with Adelaide cottage? It looks more homely. Most people can manage in a 4 bed house!

If that mini castle was always option on the Windsor estate couldn't M&H have had that? She'd have loved that.

I'm always amazed the RF can find these forgotten about houses on their estates.

I think we should be allowed to see all royal houses in a royal AD type publication. Because I am nosey.

Trevor's new house is a blah designed rich American house imo. I'm rarely impressed with American design.

Although I did like the WLM house. I do love light and a new England type style.

hepsitemiz · 27/07/2025 08:11

You think theyd’ve stayed if they’d only been given a grand enough castle to live in, wasp?

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:01

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 07:41

That looks like quite a depressing house as well.
What's wrong with Adelaide cottage? It looks more homely. Most people can manage in a 4 bed house!

If that mini castle was always option on the Windsor estate couldn't M&H have had that? She'd have loved that.

I'm always amazed the RF can find these forgotten about houses on their estates.

I think we should be allowed to see all royal houses in a royal AD type publication. Because I am nosey.

Trevor's new house is a blah designed rich American house imo. I'm rarely impressed with American design.

Although I did like the WLM house. I do love light and a new England type style.

Meghan would have loved Fort Belvedere, yet it's a "depressing" house?
That makes no sense.
Plus, how do you know these properties are "forgotten"? That's highly unlikely! 😂

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:04

Fort Belvedere was leased by a Canadian retail magnate, Galen Weston and his wife, Hilary.
So not exactly "forgotten" and most certainly lived in. From the early 80s until 2024.

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 09:17

hepsitemiz · 27/07/2025 08:11

You think theyd’ve stayed if they’d only been given a grand enough castle to live in, wasp?

Nah but it would given them less to complain about.

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 09:19

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:01

Meghan would have loved Fort Belvedere, yet it's a "depressing" house?
That makes no sense.
Plus, how do you know these properties are "forgotten"? That's highly unlikely! 😂

She seems to favour depressing castley type houses.
That's what she's chosen in USA.

Forgotten was lighthearted comment.
I'm sure the RF knew about the house 🤣.

I didn't.

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 09:21

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:04

Fort Belvedere was leased by a Canadian retail magnate, Galen Weston and his wife, Hilary.
So not exactly "forgotten" and most certainly lived in. From the early 80s until 2024.

Edited

It's interesting. Are there other leased houses we may not be aware of?

Can they lease them to anyone? Can they just end the lease if a princess wants it?

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:22

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 09:19

She seems to favour depressing castley type houses.
That's what she's chosen in USA.

Forgotten was lighthearted comment.
I'm sure the RF knew about the house 🤣.

I didn't.

Right. Ok

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:25

StrawberryWasp · 27/07/2025 09:21

It's interesting. Are there other leased houses we may not be aware of?

Can they lease them to anyone? Can they just end the lease if a princess wants it?

Good questions. I think they have quite a few properties on the Windsor estate. Obviously, they're the leaseholders, but the residents seem to have freedom to change the properties; I know the Westons did. It's a very secure estate and very private so ideal for some!

DelectableMe · 27/07/2025 09:27

I doubt very much if someone would be evicted if a member of the RF wanted it. Bad publicity!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.