People can’t just erase all the early hate Meghan faced and act like it was made up.
Your post above neatly illustrates one of the inconvenient truths that posters who adopt this line seem to want to ignore.
Some of the “early hate” you claim Meghan faced was exactly the same as the criticism that all members of the royal family face, because they are either born into, or willingly join, an institution that for many is seen as indivisbly representative of privilege, colonialism, racism, elistism, nepotism,and unwarranted power and influence. They all receive a lot of criticism (on this board and elsewhere) that is often dehumanising and unpleasant simply because of this fact.
As a mature women making a conscious choice to marry into the royal family, for a certain sector of the population Meghan was becoming “one of them” and so was therefore subject to exactly the same criticism as Charles, Camilla, William, Kate etc. Why would she be any different?
To another sector of the population Meghan was a welcome addition to the Royal Family - a of breath fresh air, and educated women of colour who could use her plate for for real good. There are also bound to be people who fell into the middle - there always are. Some who were unbothered, some who were bothered by Meghan’s nationality, or mixed race status - hopefully the latter were a minority, but it’s foolish to pretend they don’t exits in any society. They were the only people criticising her, however.
I’ve never understood why people think Meghan should have been immune to criticism for joining the royal family? If the Not my King crowd had their yellow placards organised back in 2018 you can bet your bottom dollar they would have been on the Long Walk at Windsor booing Meghan and Harry. Amongst the vast crowd of wellwishers genuinely delighted for the couple and their wedding, of course…