Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Confessions of a Female Flounder part 2

1000 replies

foreverblowingbubbless · 14/05/2025 04:39

I've embarrassed for Meghan saying that her arranging takeaway food on a plate is the same thing as what Figs Heather Hasson has done 😬

OP posts:
Thread gallery
44
CoffeeCantata · 21/05/2025 13:27

MrsLeonFarrell · 21/05/2025 07:33

Meghan was pregnant with both children. Apart from the fact that she is very obviously pregnant, as others have stated above, to be in the Line of Succession children have to be heirs of the body. Surrogate pregnancies do not qualify. If anyone here thinks that the State and the Monarchy would be prepared to allow such a deception I have a bridge to sell you.

I really wish mumsnet would delete these ridiculous, easily debunked rumours but since they allowed disgusting rumourmongering about Catherine to stand I don't expect these will be removed either.

I agree. I don't like Meghan (or Harry!) but I like to limit my criticism to verifiable facts and their clearly-evidenced behaviour.

It's not worth dignifying with attention, but just for one thing - Meghan was very obviously post-partum in that photo with baby Archie and the late Queen.

CoffeeCantata · 21/05/2025 13:35

Thedom · 21/05/2025 08:25

Yes, and the multiple coat flipping in front of cameras so her bump was as visible as possible for a good photo, also fuelled the conspiracy theories that she needed to 'prove' she was pregnant,

She really has a very bizarre persona, her using Insta and doing shows to promote herself, has illuminated that to an even great extent.

Yes - I've come to the conclusion that Meghan is a very weird person indeed. That coat-flipping - OK, we've seen the bump. And the continual adjusting of her 'concealed' mic at the Platinum Jubliee service. It's as if she wanted everyone to know what she was playing at. So many behaviours which are utterly baffling in their blatancy and shamelessness.

She is constantly playing a part and doing it very badly, but what I resent most is that she clearly thinks we're all stupid. (Well - she definitely thought we were stupid in wanting to watch her wedding, didn't she?)

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 21/05/2025 13:46

IcedPurple · 21/05/2025 10:38

I wouldn't call it a 'contract with the media'. It's plain common sense that if you are in the public eye, it's a sensible idea to have a good working relationship with the media. But obviously 'common sense' and Harry don't go together.

And I also wouldn't say Meghan 'rebelled' so much as tried to have things all her own way. As a working royal she was essentially a high level public servant, and as such can't only work with media outlets who fawn all over her. She and Harry try to do that now, but it doesn't work as you can't control the media, and attempting to do so only backfires. Which comes back to my previous point about how it makes perfect sense for famous people to cultivate a good working relationship with the media.

I doubt Harry has very much sense of quid pro quo in any of his relationships, personal or business.

MaturingCheeseball · 21/05/2025 13:52

Funny as it would be if there were fake bumps etc etc, I think it’s obvious that there is nothing more sinister than simple attention seeking. Agree that all the drama surrounding Archie’s birth was to enable US news (who would be paying handsomely) to get first dibs on the baby pics.

What I don’t understand, though, is the sudden slew of scan/pregnancy etc photos for their anniversary. Why? Who cares, for a start, and why show such private pictures? The bare bump photo looked candid - I would be very upset if dh (or whoever if not Harry in this case) was taking surreptitious photos of me, let alone pregnancy whale ones.

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 13:56

@CoffeeCantata why was she wearing a concealed mic?

And did that service come after Mexit? Was it before or after the service when she wore the green dress and was it the one where they almost fell over chairs to be where they wanted to be in the procession?

I’ve hardly known what year it is since Covid. I can’t even recall family events and if they happened
before or after Covid.

Lunde · 21/05/2025 14:59

MrsLeonFarrell · 21/05/2025 08:30

I don't think the coat flipping was bizarre as much as it was Hollywood. It looked strange because of the context but if we bear in mind that she is first and foremost a celebrity then it isn't strange at all. That's just what celebrities do, make sure the photos look good because they last forever, rather than worry about how it looks at the time in person.

I thought the coat flipping and leaving buttons undone was bizarre at Eugenie's wedding as she would only have been about 8 weeks pregnant. She definitely wanted to start speculation and grab the headlines.

Knakeredd · 21/05/2025 15:10

Lunde · 21/05/2025 14:59

I thought the coat flipping and leaving buttons undone was bizarre at Eugenie's wedding as she would only have been about 8 weeks pregnant. She definitely wanted to start speculation and grab the headlines.

Seems to be her MO - whenever there is media exposure, interest, announcement of/by someone else - she seems to launch herself on to it.

RandyRedHumpback · 21/05/2025 15:13

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 13:56

@CoffeeCantata why was she wearing a concealed mic?

And did that service come after Mexit? Was it before or after the service when she wore the green dress and was it the one where they almost fell over chairs to be where they wanted to be in the procession?

I’ve hardly known what year it is since Covid. I can’t even recall family events and if they happened
before or after Covid.

Edited

@Weepixie I'm not @CoffeeCantata , but can answer that:

The green outfit I think was their last royal engagement before they left - Commonwealth service of 2020.

The hidden mic incident was in 2022 at the 70th Jubilee, when she was wearing the Wallis Simpson lookalike white, Dior outfit with the big collar. There was a visible lump under the collar and she fiddled with the collar a lot, leading to speculation she wore a microphone.

Harry was also spotted with what looked like a microphone under his lapel at QEII's funeral. There was talk of the "fab 4" walkabout happening to stop H&M going around the crowds with a Netflix crew.

H&M were also wearing microphones when they were doing a visit to a school in NY (where the parents were all asked to sign NDAs and image release forms). But they had their Netflix crew in tow that time.

I guess if they are constantly documenting their every move; and their much vaunted "receipts" makes me think this practice of mic wearing may have gone on when they were still in the RF.

Words · 21/05/2025 15:29

Place mark

CoffeeCantata · 21/05/2025 15:48

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 13:56

@CoffeeCantata why was she wearing a concealed mic?

And did that service come after Mexit? Was it before or after the service when she wore the green dress and was it the one where they almost fell over chairs to be where they wanted to be in the procession?

I’ve hardly known what year it is since Covid. I can’t even recall family events and if they happened
before or after Covid.

Edited

Sorry - been out!

Thanks, Randy - that's right - it was when she wore the white coat-dress (I think by Dior??) with the very pronounced collar. She is fiddling with the damn thing the whole time she's on camera - just what was she thinking? Even when she's being greeted by the clergy at the door.

In addition to matter of the His-n-Hers concealed mics, apparently Meghan had commissioned Dior to copy an outfit worn by Wallis Simpson. So...if clothing is communication, then what message was she sending by choosing to imitate a Nazi-sympathising adventuress who nearly toppled the British monarchy?

I bet it didn't come cheap, either! Meghan was being either very stupid (not knowing the context and history) or very snide indeed - and neither is a good look!

CoffeeCantata · 21/05/2025 15:52

Should add that I'm sure the concealed mic business is one of the main reasons that KC won't see Harry. Harry wouldn't take kindly to being frisked. I suspect Harry has decreed that he will only see KC alone (without Camilla) and KC has probably countered by insisting on lawyers or courtiers being present - on advice.

Whatever Harry says about wanting a meeting or a reconciliation, this is a huge stumbling block. No-one can ever trust him again, inside or outside the RF.

foreverblowingbubbless · 21/05/2025 17:40

JSMill · 21/05/2025 12:12

@smilesy I agree. The timings of the announcement of the birth was weird. We had had three royal babies in the previous few years so we had seen how flawlessly the palace handled them so it looked strange. It was the first inkling we got that H and M didn’t want to do things the palace way.

It's all about her getting attention. We understand it better now. She's a narcissist.

OP posts:
IdaGlossop · 21/05/2025 17:50

CoffeeCantata · 21/05/2025 15:52

Should add that I'm sure the concealed mic business is one of the main reasons that KC won't see Harry. Harry wouldn't take kindly to being frisked. I suspect Harry has decreed that he will only see KC alone (without Camilla) and KC has probably countered by insisting on lawyers or courtiers being present - on advice.

Whatever Harry says about wanting a meeting or a reconciliation, this is a huge stumbling block. No-one can ever trust him again, inside or outside the RF.

I suspect the recording device issue also explains why he opts for hotels over palaces. If he stayed in the latter, he'd be searched and have to surrender his mobile phone.

FenellaFeldman · 21/05/2025 17:53

Lunde · 21/05/2025 14:59

I thought the coat flipping and leaving buttons undone was bizarre at Eugenie's wedding as she would only have been about 8 weeks pregnant. She definitely wanted to start speculation and grab the headlines.

I know. Only doing up the top buttons! So obvious. Yet the following week she was in a form fitting white dress with no sign of a bump. 🙄

GoldThumb · 21/05/2025 18:27

While I do think Meghan gave birth, I do also think she wore a moonbump, particularly at the beginning.
Apparently it’s common in certain circles as it gives the nice baby bump look, rather than the has she just put on a bit of weight look.

Anyway, the only reason I say that is because of the pics of her in the purple and red outfit, where it seemed to have dropped to her knees.

And then she buttoned/tied up the cardi, whereas other times she had the coat flicking going on.

I think it’s clear from their first appearance with Archie that she had actually been pregnant, you can see it in her face.

SisterTeatime · 21/05/2025 19:01

I remember getting a right kicking on here for saying l quite like seeing new royal babies and it would be good manners for them to do a pic with Archie, not necessarily on the hospital steps but a nice family photo. I wonder if any of those posters feel they were taken for a bit of a ride? Privacy for the children indeed.

M has to be the centre of attention. She can’t let anyone else have the limelight, ever. Not even the late Queen. Not even, I strongly suspect, her own children.

FenellaFeldman · 21/05/2025 19:18

What I disliked was the announcement beforehand, that there would be no pictures on the steps of the hospital, they were going to bond as a family in private. Then 3 days later - they appear in Windsor Castle with the baby. So it wasn't about privacy at all. It was because Windsor Castle was a more effective backdrop than the steps of a hospital..

rayofhope75 · 21/05/2025 19:20

Why are you going over stuff that happened 4 or 5 years ago. Is there nothing new you can criticise them about?

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 19:21

Why are you going over stuff that happened 4 or 5 years ago. Is there nothing new you can criticise them about?

There’s always something new to discuss. They’re the gift that keeps on giving.

RandyRedHumpback · 21/05/2025 19:21

rayofhope75 · 21/05/2025 19:20

Why are you going over stuff that happened 4 or 5 years ago. Is there nothing new you can criticise them about?

Yes, plenty, where do you want to start?

SisterTeatime · 21/05/2025 19:22

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 19:21

Why are you going over stuff that happened 4 or 5 years ago. Is there nothing new you can criticise them about?

There’s always something new to discuss. They’re the gift that keeps on giving.

Edited

Oh my goodness, aren’t they just!

Lifestooshort71 · 21/05/2025 19:22

rayofhope75 · 21/05/2025 19:20

Why are you going over stuff that happened 4 or 5 years ago. Is there nothing new you can criticise them about?

I agree, constantly rehashing these rumours is very tedious 🥱🥱🥱

FenellaFeldman · 21/05/2025 19:22

RandyRedHumpback · 21/05/2025 19:21

Yes, plenty, where do you want to start?

I was thinking about the mood board and the hilarious "Happy Anniversary" to herself! 😄

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 19:23

Lifestooshort71 · 21/05/2025 19:22

I agree, constantly rehashing these rumours is very tedious 🥱🥱🥱

And yet you can’t keep away.

FenellaFeldman · 21/05/2025 19:24

Weepixie · 21/05/2025 19:21

Why are you going over stuff that happened 4 or 5 years ago. Is there nothing new you can criticise them about?

There’s always something new to discuss. They’re the gift that keeps on giving.

Edited

Plus, they love it.
I suspect that not being discussed would be a problem for Harry and Meghan 😉

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread