I'd call myself 'a H & M sceptic' - someone who rolls their eyes at the bs which emanates from them. I resent the term 'hater' because it's lazy and reductive. I remember when I was teaching, I tried to get children to widen their vocabulary from just the adjective 'sad' to describe all manner of negative feelings. It's the lack of nuance which I object to.
Here's a controversial observation, but it's a genuine one (and no, I can't back it up with stats): the nastiest posts I've seen on the RF board, which descend to personal attacks and abuse, have come almost exclusively from H & M supporters. This has pretty much stopped, but over the past few years when feelings ran very high it was noticeable.
Yes - there's a tedious roll-call of dim responses on here from H & M supporters, but rarely any kind of reasoned or informed argument. As pps have said, perhaps the most irritating is 'you don't know anything about Meghan/them'. I pointed out recently that of course we did! After interviews, Spare, the Netflix doc, many, many podcasts and speeches...Harry and especially Meghan never shut up about themselves. So either we DO know plenty about them (sometimes far more than we need to know...) OR they've both been lying systematically for years. It's got to be either/or, hasn't it? Needless to say the poster then disappeared in a huff calling me a hater. It really is like playing chess with pigeons.
All I ask is...if you really do like them and you think the criticism is unfair then take the trouble to formulate your arguments. But don't come on the RF board just to insult other posters.