Conversation with John Bryan about Prince Andrew and underage girls

[Profhilodisaster]

Has anyone else seen this , it looks like a secretly recorded conversation between John Bryan (was he the chap in Fergies toe sucking scandal ?) and a journalist.
x.com/okeefemedia/status/1920229717250019537?s=46&t=zeqvo7Iw1m8V4kXAX7nn1A

No😦

I had a lot sympathy for Sarah due to all her wilderness years outside the Royal Family when she was forced to go on Oprah and graft and was purposely uninvited to events her daughters were invited to.

She never threw the RF or former in-laws under the bus despite it all. I respected that. If she's a grafter who misappropriates money (allegedly) then that's disappointing.

It seems only W&K are decent among the Royals.

*And Sophie & Edward

@GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples the public persona is decent of the royals that you have mentioned. As with Harry how do we know what is true and what is hidden by the men in grey suits. None of us know this we are only shown what they want us to see and we know what happens when one of those goes rogue as in Harry’s case.

Absolutely this!

I'm interested in the missing link in his story - he said he backed Andrew up in the statement to the Mail. But then said he was 'pissed' when he found out Andrew was lying and that he had been 'f**king' (subtitle asterisks) 'underage girls'. So what was the definite information there in that gap that he was privvy to?

Do historians care much for the siblings of monarchs?

TBH the truth will never come out because we will never know what PA was told about these girls, did he know they were trafficked or did he think they were like prostitutes there of their own free will, enjoying being wined and dined by rich men?

I think that as usual a thread about PA
doesn't get busy because what's to say. We're all in agreement that he's a creepy fucker & has bought his way out of bother. What else is there to say? A thread where we're all in agreement??

Threads about H&M are busy because they just keeping adding fuel to fire and people have different views on them

On looking at the link in the op is think calling Bryant a Royal advisor is one hell of a leap & doesn't help the credibility

I think you are spot on there.

If this is real I doubt very much Beatrice and Eugenie saw him as a father figure. Family friend perhaps.

I don't know much about him beyond toe sucking, will have a read.

Seems like Bryan made a mistake , he now says he was drunk (obvious) in the footage and was lying.

Lawyers have been deployed most likely.

For the same reason I will happily gossip and speculate about characters in a TV drama, but wouldn't do the same about people caught up.in a similar situation in real.life.

H&M are hugely privileged people embracing a narrative of victimhood, so their dramas are an entertaining source of chat and discussion.

The impact of abusers on vulnerable people is too serious to be light entertainment.

As with Harry how do we know what is true and what is hidden by the men in grey suits

We don't, @stillclueless, which is why some of us prefer to reserve comment for what they've said on the record, court documents so on

And you're not likely to find many on Twitter who are concerned about what's actually true