I have listened to the whole interview, if it can be called that rather than “ bitter man rants unchecked” , and I have to confess that a lot of my annoyance comes from my irritation at his annoying valley girl upward inflection at the end of every sentence, but I also didn’t like
his slightly threatening implication that he knows “names” , so, he has a little list, what is he going to do, ninja into their bedrooms like the SAS and cut all their throats.
his constant reiteration of certain facts , without security since 2020, lack of a security review, he had the highest risk factor, those really appeared to be his only arguments he could muster to support his case, and the more he repeated them the weaker they seemed since they were historic details but not relating to his present circumstances.
his other threats along the lines of “you’ll be sorry if something happens to me,” with the subtext of like it did with my mother. He seems to forget his mother refused all but the most basic security, then got into a car with a drunk driver and didn’t wear a seat belt.
I thought the most interesting part came when the mask slipped and he talked of “wanting” not needing, and for a second,until he realised what he had said, the privilege popped out in full sight and you realised that he is furious , not at the lack of security but at affront that someone would dare to take it
away from him.
There were clearly little snippets that he had been told to include -which he did again and again. - for example 35 years of public service(?!) , two tours of Afghanistan, Invictus games, charity work. I suppose they were supposed to make us admire him as a valued member of the human races, but only made me think hmmm, hardly a full cv for a fit healthy man approaching middle age.
Man child who has thrown his toys out of the pram, but has realised too late that he no longer has flunkies to pick them up and put them back into the pram.